Is the time of Liberty at hand?

Weren't you just saying that you supported freedom? And if that's the case, your guns can be taken away from you, because gun owners are a minority.

He supports freedom for people who agree with him and when it is freedom for what he wants. Other than that, he is as much a fan of gov't interference as the most rabid ultra-liberals.
 
No. My rights are self-evident, and a super-majority is required to quash any portion of it, in an Amendment. :D

And yet you want to take away other people's rights, just to line your own pockets. And you seem proud of that.
 
Sorry, but America was founded on religion. We are the vast majority, loser.

Wrong. Not even close. While most Americans are religious, they are not for imposing their personal beliefs on others. Bible thumpers of your ilk, which is even a minority of Christians are not the majority, much less 'vast.'
 
Wrong. Not even close. While most Americans are religious, they are not for imposing their personal beliefs on others. Bible thumpers of your ilk, which is even a minority of Christians are not the majority, much less 'vast.'
Nice straw man. Why not argue against my actual position instead of making up one your own?
 
Your item on the list "respect the difference between men & women, boys & girls"? Exactly what is the social conservative looking for on that one. Who is disrespecting those differences?
 
Liberals are, by insisting that gay behavior is normal moral natural and healthy. A perfect example is the lie that gay male pedophiles only see children, not franks and beans. Another is the gay parenting issue.
 
SM, if you are an example of where the republican party is headed, then the Libertarians should gain more and more until we hold the White House.
 
You've been after me for days to debate this topic. I've insisted on you taking your best shot on one issue and you finally did. Then I type out a devastating response and you immediately reply by insulting me. You are so predictable and your arguments are so easy to destroy. :)
 
(Originally Posted by Sterling Archer) Don't matter, your rights to everything are subject to the majority. And the majority of people look at porn.

No. My rights are self-evident, and a super-majority is required to quash any portion of it, in an Amendment. :D

Surely porn is "self-evident". If a naked woman walked past 100 men would a super-majority not look? :D
 
You've been after me for days to debate this topic. I've insisted on you taking your best shot on one issue and you finally did. Then I type out a devastating response and you immediately reply by insulting me. You are so predictable and your arguments are so easy to destroy. :)

You posted a list of items and then refused to discuss them. I have seen no "devastating response" from you, unless you consider calling me a stalker as being devastating.

Man up and stick with the issues you brought up.
 
SM, if you are an example of where the republican party is headed, then the Libertarians should gain more and more until we hold the White House.

I think you correct on this. The Democrats and Republican elites both appeal to their 'bases' or baser members. For the elites it's about enriching themselves and maintaining power.

It is past time to get some folks that recognize the limits of what the government can or should do about what the people eat, drink, smoke, ingest, or have relations with. It also is past time to believe that somehow government can protect you from your actions of spending, how you fail to raise your kids or if you are dumb enough to blow dry your hair while showering.
 
Which shows sex is preferred to whatever is being sold, from cars to clothes. Isn't it time, as a society, we accepted sex as something good instead of making it out to be something dirty?

No, but thanks for admitting that I am right, liberals use sex for profit.
 
Back
Top