Teflon Don
I'm back baby
No you wouldn’t.
Because if you really believed that, all of you liberals would band together and buy insurance for one needy family under the assumption it would save you money
Koch study: medicare for all saves money
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
No you wouldn’t.
Because if you really believed that, all of you liberals would band together and buy insurance for one needy family under the assumption it would save you money
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
... and take a cut off the top. For profit health insurance is illegal in civilized nations. It's outlawed. But america is about predation and extraction and we are all commodities and fuel for the system.
Obviously, you don't understand the concept of health insurance.
Who told you that doubling the Medicare "Tax" and the premium" will cover the costs?
What about people who don't work and don't pay for Medicare Part B?
You claimed that Medicare for All won't affect Medicare. Is that an accurate statement?
Obviously you can't prove your points.
Who told you that, racist?
Absolutely. And I'd also add that there's no material benefit to your health to have a private company administer reimbursement to your doctor.
So? Homosexuality is illegal in some countries, too. That doesn't mean we should follow suit, does it?
evince
Truthmatters
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
That would be one family that wouldn't be among the tens of thousands that die every year in america because of a lack of healthcare so that we can militarily occupy the planet and subsidize our aristocracy.
No one, because I never said that.
What I said was that instead of paying your $3,500 premium + OOPE capped at $6,350 for individuals and twice that for families, you instead pay a flat 2.9% of your income and don't have to pay any premiums or OOPE.
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
You're not following, correct.
A single payer plan is universal and the draft legislation from Sanders eliminates Medicare supplemental plans.
It won't affect Medicare other than expanding it to more people and covering more procedures, treatments, and drugs.
All this is in the draft legislation I linked to, what's your excuse for not reading it?
So you say.
You just plagiarize and sea-lion because you have nothing to add to this debate. And you know it.
evince
Truthmatters
if healthcare facilities can count on being paid they can deliver better care
No need for a collections office huh
No need to pay people who talk to the insurers
So Medicare is affected. What about co-pays? The annual Part B deductible? What about the Part A coverage limit? Do you know?
How do you know that, racist?