Into the Night
Verified User
Democrats. There was no insurrection.Who rioted at the Capitol and tried to mount an insurrection after they lost the last election, you inbred hillbilly retard?
Leftists Falsely Suggest Biden Can Assassinate Trump, SCOTUS Justices
- Thread starter Earl
- Start date
Into the Night
Verified User
The rioting was by Democrats. It was not done to protest the Democrat party. It was done to try to smear Trump supporters. It was planned for months in advance.
Choice between an old man too selfish to quit and a narcissist who lacks any sense of a moral compass
Country is f*cked either way, if Trump loses, his MAGA cult will make 1/6 look like a real tourist visit, and if he wins, there is no entity now that can check him from turning the nation into his very own banana republic
That’s right, Matt Gaetz even said on the floor of Congress that he and the Washington Examiner had proof it was Antifa who was behind the “tourist visit”
Extremely valid. You depend on slandering your enemy because your party has nothing to offer the people of America.
And Sotomayor should be impeached and removed from the bench for it.
For speaking the truth, opps, I forgot, for the cult “the truth ain’t the truth,” I forgot, the got “alternative facts,” my bad
This did not happen over-night. This has happened because of the stewardship of the recent generations of Americans. If we lose our Republic...especially to the disgusting Trump and his equally disgusting supporters...WE DESERVE IT.
For advocating the violent overthrow of the United States and the murder of political opponents.
I've already posted the actual decision that show you - and Sonja the Stupid are lying.
"Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. This case is the first criminal prosecution in our Nation’s history of a former President for actions taken during his Presidency. Determining whether and under what circumstances such a prosecution may proceed requires careful assessment of the scope of Presidential power under the Constitution. The nature of that power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office,"
You lying is expected - it's what you do. You advocating violence against enemies to your party is also expected, you're a Communist, violence is part of your evil creed.
But Sotomayor sits on the Supreme Court - for her to blatantly lie and to foment insurrection, as she has done - is treason. She should be impeached and removed.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Who?
In this case, the "Voice of the Reich" - the New Woke Times. It was in the mast head - no surprise that you missed it.
Your party is letting the mask slip and telling us who you are.
Hatred of civil rights is the foundation of modern democrats.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win
Run Earl run!!!!Leftists Falsely Suggest Biden Can Assassinate Trump, SCOTUS Justices
Leftists Falsely Suggest Biden Can Assassinate Trump, SCOTUS Justices
BRIANNA LYMAN
Leftists are incorrectly suggesting SCOTUS’s ruling permits any action by the president so long as the president calls it an official act.
Left-wing sycophants are suggesting President Joe Biden could try to assassinate former President Donald Trump or justices of the Supreme Court (or anyone!) after the high court threw a monkey wrench into their lawfare efforts to knock Trump out of the presidential race.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that presidential action falls into three categories. The first category includes acts that fall “within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority” and are therefore subject to “absolute immunity.” The second category encompasses those actions for which a president is entitled to “at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts.” Those actions are then to be litigated in court to determine whether they constitute an official or unofficial act before any prosecution can take place. The third category pertains to “unofficial acts” for which “there is no immunity.”
Left-wing sycophants are suggesting President Joe Biden could try to assassinate former President Donald Trump or justices of the Supreme Court (or anyone!) after the high court threw a monkey wrench into their lawfare efforts to knock Trump out of the presidential race.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that presidential action falls into three categories. The first category includes acts that fall “within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority” and are therefore subject to “absolute immunity.” The second category encompasses those actions for which a president is entitled to “at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts.” Those actions are then to be litigated in court to determine whether they constitute an official or unofficial act before any prosecution can take place. The third category pertains to “unofficial acts” for which “there is no immunity.”
The ruling severely hampers Special Counsel Jack Smith’s efforts to prosecute Trump ahead of the election by remanding several key questions back to the lower courts while outright rejecting other claims made by the DOJ. To be clear, we only ended up in this precarious position because Democrats decided to use lawfare to target their political opponent, forcing the Supreme Court’s hand to answer such a question.
As expected, leftists on X (with the IQ of a rock) who don’t understand the ruling are suggesting the ruling permits any type of action by the president so long as the president calls it an official act.
Leftists Falsely Suggest Biden Can Assassinate Trump, SCOTUS
Leftists are incorrectly suggesting SCOTUS's ruling permits any action by the president so long as the president calls it an official act.thefederalist.com
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
More red herring fallacy to avoid discussing facts.
Do you agree with the Banana Republic Times that the "First Amendment is Out of Control?" That people must be silenced to ensure government has enough (absolute) power?
Do you support "common sense speech control?" Should Americans be required to get a license from the federal government to post on social media? Should "wrong speech" be a criminal offense?
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Then you are at odds with your party - which is waging war on the Bill of Rights.
Why would you vote for a party that is the opposite of what you support?
This horrible Supremes ruling will be meaningless if Biden wins. He would not use or need the immunity powers. It only matters if Trump wins. Then all hell will break loose. Historians have often said that the idea that a president would be a reasonable fairminded person with respect for the law is a weakness of the system. A person like Trump breaks it all.
The horrible Supremes ruling is not important if Biden wins He is not interested in doing unethical, immoral power grabs. Trump is. We are all permuting the various ways that Trump could abuse that power. Trump has quickly listed his totalitarian plans if he gets in power including tribunals to charge and punish Dems and insufficiently loyal Repubs.
Lefty did, and rather effectively. The Federalist used to have some integrity, but now it will say whatever random lies trump orders it to. It has no value.