No, it isn't, Sock. The court has no authority to select the bonding company.
Citation?
No, it isn't, Sock. The court has no authority to select the bonding company.
do you have to submit an audit of your insurance company when you give your insurance information for your car title?
They don’t have the legal right to post bond in the state you idiot
Blatant lie. The case is still in progress.He lost the case asshole
Which means the case is still in progress.This is about him wanting to appeal that conviction
Blatant lie.The judge lowered the bar for him already shit bag
Blatant lie. A kangaroo court is not 'prime treatment'. You cannot defend a kangaroo court, Sock.He is getting prime treatment in the sysytem
Insurance is not buying a car, Sock.Stupidest attempt at a false comparison I've ever seen.
Buying a car is not posting bond in a criminal court case.
Obviously, you have no idea what a shill is (a legitimate job, BTW!).You fuckers will literally say anything in your feeble attempts to shill for your commie bastard.
How the fuck would every court be aware of every single Pawn Broker or PayDay loan or other type Bond Provider when they show up and post a Bond for a loser in a case?
Of course the Court accepts the Bond and the required paper work, when it is submitted, but then humans in the Court house administrative staff, then have to pick up the file, and review it to ensure they checked all the necessary boxes and provided all the necessary documents.
If they did not, the Court staff notify the Bond supplier what the cure is to fix the missing data.
How the fuck else could it work? A court cannot not just trust.
What crime?No.
but if the insurance Company you use is completely unknown and ends up being fraudulent you can and will get charged with a crime.
So? Trump has never filed for personal bankruptcy.let me try to dumb this down enough for you with bullet points:
- Person A wins a lawsuit, but Person B (the one he beat) gets to keep the money in his bank account for years as the Appeal plays out, because they got a Bond posted by a 3rd Party company
- Person B (the one who lost) then ends up going bankrupt during the years wait for the Appeal to go to court and has lost all the money Person A won in Court
- Person A (the winner) is still safe, as the Bond Company must pay them
The Bond company has already verified it has the funds, Sock.If you allow the Bond Company to not be verified with PROOF OF FUNDS, then a poorly run Bond Company could also go bankrupt and thus not be able to pay the Bond they guaranteed.
You lie like shit in the grass.
LIF. Grow up.
The Bonding company has already verified this, Sock.Yes it was posted. It was not verified. A posted piece of paper that says 'i guarantee' is not worth shit unless it is verified the company posting it actually has the funds.
The court has no authority to select the bonding company, Sock.it was the Court staff, who rejected it demanding it be cured as the article says you dense POS.
She has no legal action she can take. bark! bark! bark! bark! bark!Letisha James is actiing upon that and demanding the company verify by a date certain or she will take action.
No, they cannot. No court has the authority to select the bond company.What that half wit you replied to does not understand is that the COurt has EVERY RIGHT to demand any Bond company, who submits a bond, provide proof of Funds.
What crime?Also there is precedent for each and every crime Trump committed
Trump has not been found liable for any crime, Sock.and got charged with and has been found liable for.
It's the bonding company's reputation on the line. I would think the opposite is true.
Quote Originally Posted by NiftyNiblick View Post
That Shvartza broad James impresses the hell out of me.
Way to go, Baby Girl.
Let's put this pigfucking orangutan DOWN!!!
No, they don't.
lol....its NY's reputation that's on the line, cupcake.....so far they look like a banana republic......
lol....its NY's reputation that's on the line, cupcake.....so far they look like a banana republic......