Lets debate... I hear you are free on Wednesdays!

Nordberg said:
Academia is full of intelligent people. Historians are for the most part intelligent and learned people. You fear facing someone with real credentials You are more comfortable with Fox liars and far right loons. The left is in academia, because for the most part, rightys would not qualify. Listen to your favorite president talk history. He is your standard bearer.
Click to expand...
'Expert' worship. FOX is owned and operated by leftists, Sybil.
 
Hume said:
Knowing about weapons is not knowing history.
Click to expand...

Nordberg said:
Academia is full of intelligent people. Historians are for the most part intelligent and learned people. You fear facing someone with real credentials You are more comfortable with Fox liars and far right loons. The left is in academia, because for the most part, rightys would not qualify. Listen to your favorite president talk history. He is your standard bearer.
Click to expand...
Wrong. I expect people in academia to be HONEST. But many today, mostly on the Left since that's most of academia, put politics ahead of honest research. Their credentials mean NOTHING to me. NOTHING! If you have a PhD and don't know what the hell you're talking about, then you don't know what the hell you're talking about. If you have a BA and know what you're talking about, then you're streets ahead of an idiot with a PhD.


www.theatlantic.com

What an Audacious Hoax Reveals About Academia

Three scholars wrote 20 fake papers using fashionable jargon to argue for ridiculous conclusions.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com

Serious academics are often full of shit, and they should be called out for it
 
Nordberg said:
If you are doing research, you are reading books written by historians. You are so wrong. Debates and discussions are the bread and butter of historians. Your statement makes no sense . If you watch CSPAN, you will see lots of long discussions from historians. You are seeking info that feeds your biases.
Click to expand...
History is not debates or discussions.
 
Port Tack said:
What was Biden found guilty of?
Click to expand...
Biden has committed three acts of treason so far:

* Providing weapons and supplies to the enemy in time of war.
* Inviting invasion of the United States.
* Espionage.

He has also defied the Supreme Court on numerous occasions, and denies and discards the Constitution of the United States, just like you do.

He is also impersonating a president. He was never elected.
 
Into the Night said:
Biden has committed three acts of treason so far:

* Providing weapons and supplies to the enemy in time of war.
* Inviting invasion of the United States.
* Espionage.

He has also defied the Supreme Court on numerous occasions, and denies and discards the Constitution of the United States, just like you do.

He is also impersonating a president. He was never elected.
Click to expand...
I don't seem to recall him indicted or in court for any of your ridiculous charges. Are you sure it isn't just in your head?

It's not as though he has to pay 80 million for fucking a woman in a dept store dressing room or a half a billion dollars for fraud.
 
Into the Night said:
Argument from randU fallacy. Making up numbers and using them as 'data' is a fallacy, ya dumb mutt.
Click to expand...
Is that the same as sticking your fingers in your ears and going lalalalalalalalalalalala?

Nobody made up any numbers. Google for yourself presidential rankings, there are plenty of them, none will have your fuhrer ranked ahead of Biden.
 
If Joe's latest speaking appearances are any indication, he will not make it through the first 15 minutes of any debate...
Black men have to be 10 better than anyone to get a fair shot...he follows orders from Morehouse men...and then it got more divisive...
He thinks he was VP during the pandemic...and talked about Obama sending him to Detroit... and it just got worse....
 
Into the Night said:
You can measure such things, but that is not a measurement of the 'best' or 'worst' presidents. The problem is that such successes or failures might be counted as 'good' or 'bad' depending on who you're talking to.

In other words, who is 'best' or 'worst' as a President is strictly a personal opinion, using such things as a metric.

For example:
Pulling out of the Paris Accord treaty can be considered a 'good' thing or a 'bad' thing, depending on who you talk to.
Creating a treaty with, say, Russia, can be a 'good' thing or a 'bad' thing, depending on who you talk to.
Click to expand...
However if you are talking to scholars instead of brainwashed ignorant assholes like you they all say trump is a piece of shit and Biden is a pretty good president.
 
TOP said:
If Joe's latest speaking appearances are any indication, he will not make it through the first 15 minutes of any debate...
Black men have to be 10 better than anyone to get a fair shot...he follows orders from Morehouse men...and then it got more divisive...
He thinks he was VP during the pandemic...and talked about Obama sending him to Detroit... and it just got worse....
Click to expand...
you are full of shit, besides trump's "Reich" is not an option for anyone with sense.
 
TOP said:
If Joe's latest speaking appearances are any indication, he will not make it through the first 15 minutes of any debate...
Black men have to be 10 better than anyone to get a fair shot...he follows orders from Morehouse men...and then it got more divisive...
He thinks he was VP during the pandemic...and talked about Obama sending him to Detroit... and it just got worse....
Click to expand...
That was Joke pandering to the audience for votes. It was a sort of, Vote for me or the MAGA Republicans will put you back in chains... sort of thing. It was also an awful speech to give at a commencement in particular. Speeches at such an event should be uplifting and inspiring, not gloom and doom, and certainly not about politics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top