Liberal gun bullshit

cannabis said:
do you hold liquor and auto makers responsible for DUI deaths and injury?

additionally, the AWB was not struck down by anyone, it expired of its own accord due to the sunset provision. might to get your facts straight before spouting off hate filled rants.
Click to expand...

Your beloved NRA and the right wing absolutists don't manufacture weapons, they cling to them.

"The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government."
Thomas Jefferson to the Republican Citizens of Washington County, Maryland" (March 31, 1809).
 
Bfgrn said:
Your beloved NRA and the right wing absolutists don't manufacture weapons, they cling to them.

"The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government."
Thomas Jefferson to the Republican Citizens of Washington County, Maryland" (March 31, 1809).
Click to expand...

do you hold liquor and auto makers responsible for DUI deaths and injury?
 
Darla said:
My facts were straight. Period.

As for mental illness, I'm not going to address that - it's a distraction that the gun lobby has ordered its puppets to use (and yes some on the left have gone along with this, stupidly), in order to deflect attention from the rising call for gun control.

We need to strike now on gun control, not sidebar into some nonsense about mental illness, when the entire left would gleefully support single payer including full access to mental health care, and the entire right gleefully knows they will never vote to fund even slightly more access, so the monsters actually use it as a distraction tactic, knowing full well it's irrelevant, because they will never allow it.

Play that game with other lefties, the stupid ones. Not with me.

Gun control.

Only thing I want to talk about until we get it.
Click to expand...

Good; because this should mean that you're going to shut the fuck up, about other things.

THERE IS A GOD :D
 
Superfreak said:
If every gun was not only banned, but destroyed... do you think these events would stop?

What would stop someone from simply taking a bomb into the building? anyone can find out how to make a home made one... what is to stop that?

You want to blame an inanimate object for the actions of a deranged person.
Click to expand...

I guess gun laws would have saved all these people.
The Oklahoma blast claimed 168 lives, including 19 children under the age of 6, and injured more than 680 people.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you still haven't read the debunking of that tired old totalitarian decision, have you??? http://www.popehat.com/2012/09/19/t...hackneyed-apologia-for-censorship-are-enough/
Click to expand...

LMAO! Debunked by that world renowned expert...blogger Ken...

You're an idiot...

"The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government."
Thomas Jefferson to the Republican Citizens of Washington County, Maryland" (March 31, 1809).
 
"Aikens v. Wisconsin, 195 U.S. 194, 205, 206. The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. It does not even protect a man from an injunction against uttering words that may have all the effect of force. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 439. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."
Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
 
Superfreak said:
The enablers would be those who want to take away guns from the law abiding citizens?
Click to expand...

I wonder what they would do, to stop someone from manufacturing a weapon.
On top of that:
On the old AOL board there was a poster that showed how the Chinese had bought the rights to a Kanadian seaport and were importing AK-47's and then they were being sold to gangs in California.
Apple probably won't admit it; but a lot of people thought he was going to have a heart attack trying to refute the shown info.

So let's confiscate all firearms in the US.
What's to stop a criminal from getting one, from outside our borders?
Maybe Mexico will have their own Fast and Furious operation.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I guess gun laws would have saved all these people.
The Oklahoma blast claimed 168 lives, including 19 children under the age of 6, and injured more than 680 people.
Click to expand...

The perfect solution fallacy is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect solution exists and/or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented. This is a classic example of black and white thinking, in which a person fails to see the complex interplay between multiple component elements of a situation or problem, and as a result, reduces complex problems to a pair of binary extremes.
 
Howey said:
Glad to see you're still supporting gunning down innocent little children. How proud your mother should be of you, traitor!



There are other, more important, guarantees in the Constitution. One of them being "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". The parents of 20 dead children have been denied that right at the hands of gun advocates.
Click to expand...

Are you just as happy to see yourself tap dancing on their bodies, while you try to push your agenda; which liberals have failed to succeed with, in the past.

Time to change my signature lines.
 
Bfgrn said:
The perfect solution fallacy is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect solution exists and/or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented. This is a classic example of black and white thinking, in which a person fails to see the complex interplay between multiple component elements of a situation or problem, and as a result, reduces complex problems to a pair of binary extremes.
Click to expand...

Once upon a time a poor carpenter picked up a piece of wood while fixing a table. When he began to chisel it, the wood started to moan. This frightened the carpenter, and he decided to get rid of it at once. So he gave it to his friend, Geppetto, who wanted to make a puppet.

Geppetto, a cobbler, took the wood home, thinking about the name he would give his puppet. “I'll call him Pinocchio,” he told himself. “It's a lucky name.”

Back at his home, Geppetto started to carve the wood. Suddenly a voice squealed, “Oh! That hurt!”
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Once upon a time a poor carpenter picked up a piece of wood while fixing a table. When he began to chisel it, the wood started to moan. This frightened the carpenter, and he decided to get rid of it at once. So he gave it to his friend, Geppetto, who wanted to make a puppet.

Geppetto, a cobbler, took the wood home, thinking about the name he would give his puppet. “I'll call him Pinocchio,” he told himself. “It's a lucky name.”

Back at his home, Geppetto started to carve the wood. Suddenly a voice squealed, “Oh! That hurt!”
Click to expand...

Behold the response of the polarized childlike right wing mind. Children's stories...LMFAO!

Behold the polarized childlike right wing mind next response; projection...



BTW, you claimed that I was on your ignore list...the polarized childlike right wing mind is also devoid of any shred of honesty, morality, ethics or character.
 
Bfgrn said:
Behold the response of the polarized childlike right wing mind. Children's stories...LMFAO!

Behold the polarized childlike right wing mind next response; projection...



BTW, you claimed that I was on your ignore list...the polarized childlike right wing mind is also devoid of any shred of honesty, morality, ethics or character.
Click to expand...

You're the one that made the decision to post fairy tales and find where I said you were on my IA list.
That is, unless your just another idiot that likes to make believe what others have said and then you work real hard on making yourself believe even your own lies.

Until then; I remember you saying that you enjoyed sex with your adult relatives.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You're the one that made the decision to post fairy tales and find where I said you were on my IA list.
That is, unless your just another idiot that likes to make believe what others have said and then you work real hard on making yourself believe even your own lies.

Until then; I remember you saying that you enjoyed sex with your adult relatives.
Click to expand...

Except I posted no 'fairy tales'. Your reply was a classic example of the perfect solution fallacy: where an argument assumes that a perfect solution must exist and/or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it has been implemented.

I would be happy to prove you claimed to put me on your ignore list. If the board has a complete archive, I request a board administrator grant me access.
 
Bfgrn said:
Except I posted no 'fairy tales'. Your reply was a classic example of the perfect solution fallacy: where an argument assumes that a perfect solution must exist and/or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it has been implemented.

I would be happy to prove you claimed to put me on your ignore list. If the board has a complete archive, I request a board administrator grant me access.
Click to expand...

Here we go again:

Hard by a great forest dwelt a poor wood-cutter with his wife
and his two children.
The boy was called Hansel and the girl Gretel.
He had little to bite and to break, and once when great dearth fell on the land, he could no longer procure even daily bread.
Now when he thought over this by night in his bed, and tossed about in his anxiety, he groaned and said to his wife, what is to become of us. How are we to feed our poor children, when we no longer have anything even for ourselves.
I'll tell you what, husband, answered the woman, early to-morrow morning we
will take the children out into the forest to where it is the thickest.
There we will light a fire for them, and give each of them one more piece of bread, and then we will go to our work and leave them alone.

The usual Liberal way; abortion after the fact.

OH, so now you can't find it; unless you get the mods cooperation.
Liar
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Here we go again:

Hard by a great forest dwelt a poor wood-cutter with his wife
and his two children.
The boy was called Hansel and the girl Gretel.
He had little to bite and to break, and once when great dearth fell on the land, he could no longer procure even daily bread.
Now when he thought over this by night in his bed, and tossed about in his anxiety, he groaned and said to his wife, what is to become of us. How are we to feed our poor children, when we no longer have anything even for ourselves.
I'll tell you what, husband, answered the woman, early to-morrow morning we
will take the children out into the forest to where it is the thickest.
There we will light a fire for them, and give each of them one more piece of bread, and then we will go to our work and leave them alone.

The usual Liberal way; abortion after the fact.

OH, so now you can't find it; unless you get the mods cooperation.
Liar
Click to expand...

That's it...double down. Hey pea brain, why don't you make some more perfect solution fallacy arguments? Like: Why have speed limits, because not everyone will obey them? Seat belts are a bad idea. People are still going to die in car crashes.

I joined this forum 04-17-2009. Shortly after, you claimed to put me on ignore. My archives go back to: 07-18-2011 02:54 AM. Your archives go back to: 10-03-2012 10:57 PM. Thus, "If the board has a complete archive, I request a board administrator grant me access."
 
Bfgrn said:
That's it...double down. Hey pea brain, why don't you make some more perfect solution fallacy arguments? Like: Why have speed limits, because not everyone will obey them? Seat belts are a bad idea. People are still going to die in car crashes.

I joined this forum 04-17-2009. Shortly after, you claimed to put me on ignore. My archives go back to: 07-18-2011 02:54 AM. Your archives go back to: 10-03-2012 10:57 PM. Thus, "If the board has a complete archive, I request a board administrator grant me access."
Click to expand...


HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

You're claiming something, from over 3 fucking years ago.

How long have you been OCD?

HA HA HA HA HA HA

By the way, bitch; mine goes back to 7-15-11. :eek2:

HEY MODS:
Can you grant me access to 04/17/09, just so I can look through the posts of the BigFuckingGRIN and find something that I can hold him to?
 
Last edited:
Here's the thing that gets me, most of the general public, and certainly "the media" doesn't comprehend the difference between AK-47 and AR-15, when it comes to weapons, and there is the descriptor "military-style semi-automatic assault rifle" which sounds very intimidating. When you actually get into the gist of the descriptors, they aren't as "awful" as they sound to the novice. I am sure Bushmaster, or any firearms manufacturer could abandon the 'military style' for something that looked dorky and wimpy instead, but would it make the gun less of a weapon? Maybe they should do that, and paint them pink! Then they could say it was a "semi-automatic barbie style" weapon. Would it make any liberal feel better when one was used to perpetrate a crime like what happened in CT? I sincerely doubt it.

Liberals, and Socialist Marxists (same difference) want to take your weapons away. It's that simple. Once they have disarmed America, controlling the masses is easy, if we get out of line or protest, they can mow us down and dump us in mass graves, like they did in the Soviet Union and other totalitarian countries through history. In true Marxist Socialist form, they seek to do this incrementally, not all at once, because they know the public would never stand for it all at once. They exploit tragedies such as this, to implement their policies and remove us from our guns and liberties even further, and this will not stop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top