Might makes right, good nazi girl
Liberal Take on American Independence
- Thread starter Minister of Truth
- Start date
Might makes right, good nazi girl
might drives events -right or wrongly
The cops don't get convicted, they shoot, ppl bitch, they walk... Maybe they write a book?? Sell the murder weapon?? Or just go back to work & "be more careful next time"....
You know, don't stand lingering over your kill, don't be observed planting evidence, you know just don't get caught
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
I think this article should be read every 4th of July. We can get a good, conservative, pro-American, article to read with it.
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Here's to your century, Top.
Abraham Lincoln. In July 1858, he spoke of the strength that Americans draw from pride in their forebears who founded the nation. Then he said words worth recalling in full as we celebrate our independence:
“We have besides these men — descended by blood from our ancestors — among us perhaps half our people who are not descendants at all of these men, they are men who have come from Europe — German, Irish, French and Scandinavian — men that have come from Europe themselves, or whose ancestors have come hither and settled here, finding themselves our equals in all things. If they look back through this history to trace their connection with those days by blood, they find they have none, they cannot carry themselves back into that glorious epoch and make themselves feel that they are part of us. But when they look through that old Declaration of Independence they find that those old men say that ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,’ and then they feel that that moral sentiment taught in that day evidences their relation to those men, that it is the father of all moral principle in them, and that they have a right to claim it as though they were blood of the blood, and flesh of the flesh, of the men who wrote that Declaration. And so they are.”
“We have besides these men — descended by blood from our ancestors — among us perhaps half our people who are not descendants at all of these men, they are men who have come from Europe — German, Irish, French and Scandinavian — men that have come from Europe themselves, or whose ancestors have come hither and settled here, finding themselves our equals in all things. If they look back through this history to trace their connection with those days by blood, they find they have none, they cannot carry themselves back into that glorious epoch and make themselves feel that they are part of us. But when they look through that old Declaration of Independence they find that those old men say that ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,’ and then they feel that that moral sentiment taught in that day evidences their relation to those men, that it is the father of all moral principle in them, and that they have a right to claim it as though they were blood of the blood, and flesh of the flesh, of the men who wrote that Declaration. And so they are.”
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so you're a nazi?
Here's to your century, Top.
This one
But I wasnt kicked out of the American military
SmarterthanYou
rebel
hard to be kicked out of something you were too cowardly to join, don't you think?
Wait kids like you who are too dumb to go to college sign up, and you were to dumb too stay in.
Cable guy
SmarterthanYou
rebel
many simple minded morons, like you, believe the same. i'm ok with your idiotic preconceived notions since they are nothing but bullshit.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
You obviously haven't studied Frontier history of North America. That's simply not true. The French had a remarkable and peaceful relationship with the Natives and they often integrated with them and the French post colonial record in North America indicates strongly that they would not have dispossessed or militarily conquered Native Americans.
The article the OP links to is a joke meant to twist American nativist panties in a wad written by a conservative Tory apologist.
All three points made are wrong. In fact rediculously so. The Brits were as responsible for the genocide of Native Americans as the Americans are. The authors reference to Joseph Brant is particularly laughable. The Brits unethical, immoral, cowardly and disgusting betrayal of the Iroquois played a direct role in their Genocide.
In addition there is no evidence that the Brits would have ended slavery in the American south as the certainly did nothing to end it in the Haj or in their Middle Eastern or African colonies. The Brits would permitted its continued use as long as it allowed the production of cotton for British textile industry and the South would have remained an undeveloped, one product, colonial backwater.
His third argument is the most laughable. To think that the Brits weak proportional government could effectively run a Nation as large as the US is just fucking silly and the notion that a British style Constitutional Monarchy including the rigid and non-egalitarian British class system would somehow be better for America is only worth hoots of laughter as a response.
So you Nativist can relax and go change your panties. The article was an absurdity.
Last edited:
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Too dumb to.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Like hell it was. You're like 3D...where do you come up with this stuff?