Lies by Trumppers Vol. 1

PostmodernProphet said:
oh, you mean the WI SC court opinion you were pretending was never issued......you confused me by saying I didn't comprehend it.......you could comprehend it too if you ever stop pretending you've never heard of it and read it.......
Click to expand...

I know EXACTLY what was issued and it wasn’t the lie you propagate.

Sad little fuck doesn’t know the difference between an administrative rule and a constitutional requirement.

No wonder your law school closed its fucking doors.
 
domer76 said:
Sad little fuck doesn’t know the difference between an administrative rule and a constitutional requirement.
Click to expand...

and this sad little fuck doesn't comprehend that administrative rules cannot violate the requirements of the constitution....which by the way is why the WI SC threw out unsupervized drop boxes.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you think the US Code is opinion?...
Click to expand...

If you do not understand any of the codes, as you clearly have demonstrated you do not, then you certainly will not be able to discuss intelligently any of the opinions. Something you have proven, time and again.
 
QP! said:
If you do not understand any of the codes, as you clearly have demonstrated you do not, then you certainly will not be able to discuss intelligently any of the opinions. Something you have proven, time and again.
Click to expand...

no one has found any provisions of the code that apply so far.......you got anything?.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and this sad little fuck doesn't comprehend that administrative rules cannot violate the requirements of the constitution....which by the way is why the WI SC threw out unsupervized drop boxes.....
Click to expand...

They said the Wisconsin Election Commission overstepped its authority when it told the clerks to use drop boxes. Why?

It wasn’t that drop boxes were unconstitutional or anything of the sort. It was because drop boxes were not mentioned one way or another in the law or administrative rules. The law said ballots were to be returned to the municipal clerks. The conservative Wisconsin SC ruled that meant in person, not a secure drop box steps away from their office. They said the WEC directive was an unpromulgated administrative rule. No more, no less.

NOWHERE did that SC rule that the election was illegal, unsecure, invalid or unconstitutional. It was legally certified and electors chosen. Just as the Constitution requires.

So, for you to continue to claim it was an unconstitutional election just demonstrates your lack of comprehension of the law and this particular decision.

You disgrace even your failed law school.
 
tigerred59 said:
Question.....how can you tell if Trump and his GOP supporters are lying motherfuckers with nothing in the brain but dog shit? Watch them breath at a Trump rally!!! Nothing but hot air and sawdust in the air.
Click to expand...

Oh look, Guano is thanking his own posts. How fucking pathetic.
 
Nordberg said:
The judge did not evaluate the property. What he did was cite the evaluations that were done in the past. He is not deciding what they are worth, just making it clear that Trump's evaluations were at a fraction of the value when paying taxes and multiples higher when he sought a loan. That is the fraud.
Click to expand...

You're flat out lying.

Comrade EnGöring IGNORED all of the valuations and made up a number to support his persecution of the opposition candidate.
 
Jarod said:
You do not get to chose the fair market value of a what you are reporting. Idiot.
Click to expand...

Yet that is what EnGöring did. He ignored the facts and put out a laughable number in order to justify his corrupt proceeding.

Some real third world shit going on among your fascists.
 
domer76 said:
They said the Wisconsin Election Commission overstepped its authority when it told the clerks to use drop boxes. Why?

It wasn’t that drop boxes were unconstitutional or anything of the sort. It was because drop boxes were not mentioned one way or another in the law or administrative rules. The law said ballots were to be returned to the municipal clerks. The conservative Wisconsin SC ruled that meant in person, not a secure drop box steps away from their office. They said the WEC directive was an unpromulgated administrative rule. No more, no less.

NOWHERE did that SC rule that the election was illegal, unsecure, invalid or unconstitutional. It was legally certified and electors chosen. Just as the Constitution requires.

So, for you to continue to claim it was an unconstitutional election just demonstrates your lack of comprehension of the law and this particular decision.

You disgrace even your failed law school.
Click to expand...
Which is why PmP knows he is not supposed to comment on anything about the 'law' or 'constitution'.

HIs demonstrable track record is running 100% in getting all of it wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top