McConnell is said to be pleased about impeachment, believing it will be easier to pur
- Thread starter BidenPresident
- Start date
He was impeached twice. He was not convicted due to party politics the first time. This one will be more interesting.
When even Republicans support impeachment... This does not look good for trump.
trump really should not have targeted Republicans for murder.
trump has lost 9% of that 74 million already, so that is 67 million. Lets say he sticks at that, he continues to be able to get 40% of the vote, but no more...
That would be the worst disaster possible for the Republicans. It is too much support to change their strategy, and too little to win general elections. They would become the "also ran" party. And that is McConnell's fear.
If he can get rid of trump, he hopes the trump voters will have nowhere else to go, and stay in the Republican Party. he then hopes he can add to that more votes and get up to 50% or more.
you dont understand populism. while of course many sheeple like yourself simply vote (D) or (R)
there are a large amount of Trump voters who are independent
I change partys all the time. I've supported Hillary ( before Libya), Obama ( before his manifest racialism)
and have voted 3rd party for Gary Johnson for POTUS
Modern Dems are an anathema because of their statism, and the power of the elites behind them
So I can just not vote, or vote 3rd party as much as Republican in 2024
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Trump has also been through the worst two week period of any president since Lincoln so I wouldn’t put a lot of stock in his *present* numbers. Keep in mind Biden hasn’t done anything yet—there is much that he and the Democrats can screw up and the ‘Trump years’ can start looking pretty good in the not too distant future.
Again with democrats, they are a divided party. The only thing that has united democrats for four years has been Donald J. Trump. Ironically, it may be democrats that need Trump to stick around in order to hold their party together.
The AOC wing is ascendant and has all the energy. The problem is democrats can’t win a national election running on socialism. That’s why the DNC kicked Bernie to the curb in the primaries. It would have been an electoral massacre putting Bernie up against a pre-COVID Trump.
[thank you, CCP bastards]
The moderate wing [basically the democrat establishment] has broader appeal nationally but it’s doubtful democrats can win a national election without having their radical wing engaged.
What has kept them United?
Their shared hatred for the Bad Orange Man. With Trump out of the picture it will be like removing an 800# gorilla from the room. If nothing else, it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
The evidence wasn’t strong enough to overcome the party politics lol.
The founders *intended* to make removal from office difficult for a reason: because the temptation would be for the opposing party to use impeachment as means to effect an electoral change and that power belongs in the hands of the people.
Basically, the first impeachment was a misguided effort that shouldn’t have occurred. Pelosi actually knew this, at one point.
This one is no better. In an actual trial democrats will need more than rhetoric in order to establish their predicate [that Trump incited the protesters to riot]. They are going to need evidence. Failing that, they can hope for enough squishy republicans to give a ‘virtue signal vote’ to remove Trump from office. Except he will no longer be there.
Like I said, this one is no better than the last; in fact, it’s arguably absurd. But these are democrats in the Trump era, so yeah.
Ok, he is impeached.
Now what?
We all saw him do it on video you freak of nature. How can you be this ignorant?
We all need to try & keep in mind that Boris aka anatta isn't attached or wedded to trump, honest, he said so.......
He is now a progressive liberal...
Can you tell???
CLASSIC LIBERAL not "progressive" anythingWe all need to try & keep in mind that Boris aka anatta isn't attached or wedded to trump, honest, he said so.......
He is now a progressive liberal...
Can you tell???
you need to pay attention instead of writing crap like calling me a progressive
60' are classic liberals..Progressives are socialists/statists
rofl... what is that expression ? "For Want of a Nail"I think you are off your rocker...........& pun intended
In this case its want of a period (.) After the word liberal. so it says "Im still a liberal". period.
then the next word is the next sentence "Progressive cancel culture is illiberal " where i/cons make the case
Progressive is the antithesis of classic liberalism
meh. i appreciate being able to re-say it again;
it's key to understanding Progressive Dems are NOT 'liberals'
killer green. I havent smoked in a couple weeks..I think my last post did that, so you can take your meds & go to sleep now.........
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
China Mitch never should have been allowed to be in the Senate to begin with.
rofl... what is that expression ? "For Want of a Nail"
In this case its want of a period (.) After the word liberal. so it says "Im still a liberal". period.
then the next word is the next sentence "Progressive cancel culture is illiberal " where i/cons make the case
Progressive is the antithesis of classic liberalism
meh. i appreciate being able to re-say it again;
it's key to understanding Progressive Dems are NOT 'liberals'
Oh my word, how low can one apologist go, now it's the O' where the fuck is that dot".........
& don't even try & use that O' "like I missed my period" w/ me, nothing happened so stop right there.
You damn progressives' will stop @ nothing in your pursuit of untruth & alternative facts.......