lisasanders1964
Banned
That's the summary that Barr prepared. It is NOT the Mueller report you fucking dickhead.
I can’t help if you RW morons don’t know the difference between “innocent” or “no evidence” and “beyond a reasonable doubt”.
you blithering idiot!The words were not “no evidence”. Barr wrote there was not sufficient evidence. Understand the difference?
What was released was a summary of the Mueller report - prepared by trump cock sucker Barr.
Obviously Barr is NOT going to release the FULL Mueller report.
And Mueller made it VERY CLEAR that he did not have sufficient evidence to charge trump or any of his russian mates.
Hmmm - who refused to participate in the Mueller investigation? Yep the fucking orange cunt.
Ah, yes, have you forgotten who hired Barr?
Mueller basically says there is no conclusion (public evidence) of Obstruction -
but leaves the determination up to Barr and Rosenweasel.
Because there was no intent to collude, there was no underlying attempt (intent) at obstruction -
but Mueller left that final determination to Barr and Rosenweasel - who completely cleared Trump!
That's the summary that Barr prepared. It is NOT the Mueller report you fucking dickhead.
That's the summary that Barr prepared. It is NOT the Mueller report you fucking dickhead.
LOL! The report literally sais 'this does not exonerate him.'
Yet not enough evidence of obstruction...
Suck on it
But Shiffty says there is plenty of evidence of collusion...
How is it he knows more than Mueller?
OMG..so now you wanna impeach Barr's bona fides?? are you out of your mind??Ah, yes, have you forgotten who hired Barr?
But not for collusion or obstruction which you idiots claimed as basically proved. You have been saying for a long time, iirc, that Trump is going down for collusion and or obstruction.
Now you idiots are moving the goal posts after being proven wrong.
It was Barr that wrote the summary, Mueller wasn't even consulted...
The whole thing was based on collusion and conspiracy, whi h you lying Dems claimed was a fact. Now you have egg on your face and most will no longer believe your hysterical claims about Trump. Suck on that.
If Mullet wanted to charge Trump for obstruction—he would have.
Apparently—like I’ve been saying for almost two years—an obstruction charge would have been iffy, at best.