Now I understand

Leonthecat said:
I'm sure that if I own twenty or thirty guns that a burglar will be far less likely to invade my home than if I own only one or two.
That's not insane thinking. Is it?

1304712010-lots-o-guns.jpg

DOES THAT MAKE ME A GUN NUT?​
Click to expand...

If you are opposed to the second article of the Bill of Rights, then you are a gun nut. Otherwise, have at it.
 
Abatis said:
I've enjoyed on-line debate for over 23 years and in all the Newsgroups and Bulletin Boards and Web boards I've been on, the arguments from the leftist anti's here, are the most juvenile, emotional, angry, poorly developed and utterly lacking in substance that I have ever read.

It is amazing; that only idiotic, inconsequential, unimportant and immaterial points can be the drivers of their argument.
Click to expand...

wow you don't understand what humor is


look at your answers to a little humor

utterly juvenile
 
kaz said:
tell me that you ... actually believe ... that if Obama could sign a bill making guns illegal, he wouldn't sign it
Click to expand...

why do you just keep lying even though you have been given the FACTS

74% of Americans want guns legal.

that includes people like me


you of course will band with your fellow right wing liars and pretend that is not true because it ruins your memes.



its completely stupid to ban all guns



PEOPLE CAN MAKE GUNS


you cant ban them even if you wanted to


Oh and by the way


I DONT WANT TO



you of course will just keep lying about it
 
evince said:
wow you don't understand what humor is


look at your answers to a little humor

utterly juvenile
Click to expand...

And trying to explain away your idiocy as 'trying to be funny' when you are so obviously -heart attack- serious in your vitriol, is even more contemptible.

In your mind is your inability to write in complete sentences a flaw or advantage in conveying your views?

I do thank you for being such a consistent example of the lack of intelligence and civility that I denounce.
 
Abatis said:
I've enjoyed on-line debate for over 23 years and in all the Newsgroups and Bulletin Boards and Web boards I've been on, the arguments from the leftist anti's here, are the most juvenile, emotional, angry, poorly developed and utterly lacking in substance that I have ever read.

It is amazing; that only idiotic, inconsequential, unimportant and immaterial points can be the drivers of their argument.
Click to expand...

As you know, everyone in he civilised world regards you gun-nuts as total maniacs who long since lost connection with sense and are in love with murder. See a psychiatrist soon.
 
Abatis said:
And trying to explain away your idiocy as 'trying to be funny' when you are so obviously -heart attack- serious in your vitriol, is even more contemptible.

In your mind is your inability to write in complete sentences a flaw or advantage in conveying your views?

I do thank you for being such a consistent example of the lack of intelligence and civility that I denounce.
Click to expand...

you deny science


you deny math



you deny history



all to cling to a racists world view.

YOU are the hated people in this world.


everyone hates racists
 
iolo said:
As you know, everyone in he civilised world regards you gun-nuts as total maniacs who long since lost connection with sense and are in love with murder. See a psychiatrist soon.
Click to expand...

As if the opinion of a emasculated European means anything to us.

Europeans fall into two groups, hailing from from the part of Europe who's ass we kicked or who's ass we saved.

Why either one believes they possess any authority to direct the actions of the USA is funny (really funny, not the evince kind of not-funny-funny).
 
Abatis said:
As if the opinion of a emasculated European means anything to us.

Europeans fall into two groups, hailing from from the part of Europe who's ass we kicked or who's ass we saved.

Why either one believes they possess any authority to direct the actions of the USA is funny (really funny, not the evince kind of not-funny-funny).
Click to expand...
Jesus - you think bang-bangs are balls, do you, as you shit yourselves under your beds? You may fuck donkeys, kid, but you never saved a single donkey here.
 
evince said:
you deny science


you deny math



you deny history



all to cling to a racists world view.

YOU are the hated people in this world.


everyone hates racists
Click to expand...



emotion isn't erudition



prejudice isn't policy



accusation isn't argument
 
Last edited:
iolo said:
Jesus - you think bang-bangs are balls, do you, as you shit yourselves under your beds? You may fuck donkeys, kid, but you never saved a single donkey here.
Click to expand...

And you think being disarmed by your government is being "civilized"?

How fucked can you be when you espouse submission and subjugation and helplessness as the definition of being "civilized"? It sounds like you equate humans being "civilized" with animals being domesticated.

Your definition of "civilized" means that you are forever and inescapably at the mercy of the uncivilized, whether they be criminals or in authority.

You believe the siren song of statist authoritarians, that having your self-determination removed and life-and-death decisions made for you and that your surrender to the state will protect you.

If that's being "civilized" then I will forever remain uncivilized and you will be my very well fucked donkey if I choose to engage in donkey fucking.

To me, for this immediate subject, possessing the means to kill but choosing not to, is what being "civilized" is . . . And being armed and able to defend oneself doesn't represent fear; it represents confidence that I need not submit to illegitimate force.
 
Last edited:
Abatis said:
And you think being disarmed by your government is being "civilized"?

How fucked can you be when you espouse submission and subjugation and helplessness as the definition of being "civilized"? It sounds like you equate humans being "civilized" with animals being domesticated.

Your definition of "civilized" means that you are forever and inescapably at the mercy of the uncivilized, whether they be criminals or in authority.

You believe the siren song of statist authoritarians, that having your self-determination removed and life-and-death decisions made for you and that your surrender to the state will protect you.

If that's being "civilized" then I will forever remain uncivilized and you will be my very well fucked donkey if I choose to engage in donkey fucking.

To me, for this immediate subject, possessing the means to kill but choosing not to, is what being "civilized" is . . . And being armed and able to defend oneself doesn't represent fear; it represents confidence that I need not submit to illegitimate force.
Click to expand...
Nobody is being 'disarmed' because they are too grown-up to spend their only lives dreading their neighbours and playing cowboys, you pathetic prick.
 
iolo said:
Nobody is being 'disarmed' because they are too grown-up to spend their only lives dreading their neighbours and playing cowboys, you pathetic prick.
Click to expand...

Do you dread your neighbours, or is there a reason why your mind drifts toward them and not to the state?
 
iolo said:
Nobody is being 'disarmed' because they are too grown-up to spend their only lives dreading their neighbours and playing cowboys, you pathetic prick.
Click to expand...

Nobody's been disarmed????

The UK style gun control you tout and live under has been disarming Britain's loyal subjects for centuries.

Only recently has the impetus for UK gun control turned to crime control. That your subjugated and obedient fellow subjects don't shoot each other with the guns they haven't been allowed to have, isn't really all that noteworthy.

The gun control you happily submit to was originally implemented and enforced for political purposes on those your rulers deemed to be a threat to their authoritarianism.

This debate we are having ain't new; it goes back to Locke and Sidney vs Filmer and Bodin for Christ sake you limey idiot.
 
Abatis said:
And you think being disarmed by your government is being "civilized"?

How fucked can you be when you espouse submission and subjugation and helplessness as the definition of being "civilized"? It sounds like you equate humans being "civilized" with animals being domesticated.

Your definition of "civilized" means that you are forever and inescapably at the mercy of the uncivilized, whether they be criminals or in authority.

You believe the siren song of statist authoritarians, that having your self-determination removed and life-and-death decisions made for you and that your surrender to the state will protect you.

If that's being "civilized" then I will forever remain uncivilized and you will be my very well fucked donkey if I choose to engage in donkey fucking.

To me, for this immediate subject, possessing the means to kill but choosing not to, is what being "civilized" is . . . And being armed and able to defend oneself doesn't represent fear; it represents confidence that I need not submit to illegitimate force.
Click to expand...

Reminder that Iolo is on The List.
 
evince said:
well maybe a few people could prove a real need for one and get a special permit.


but racists like you should not be allowed any weapons.


You are insane
Click to expand...

Are you and Leonpussy gonna come take the ones I have? I hope you do. I really hope you. Something tells me neither of you have the balls.
 
I Love America said:
Are you and Leonpussy gonna come take the ones I have? I hope you do. I really hope you. Something tells me neither of you have the balls.
Click to expand...

No one is going to take your substitute penis, you dickless loser.
Now calm down and relax before you blow out an O ring or something.
Lol
 
Abatis said:
Nobody's been disarmed????

The UK style gun control you tout and live under has been disarming Britain's loyal subjects for centuries.

Only recently has the impetus for UK gun control turned to crime control. That your subjugated and obedient fellow subjects don't shoot each other with the guns they haven't been allowed to have, isn't really all that noteworthy.

The gun control you happily submit to was originally implemented and enforced for political purposes on those your rulers deemed to be a threat to their authoritarianism.

This debate we are having ain't new; it goes back to Locke and Sidney vs Filmer and Bodin for Christ sake you limey idiot.
Click to expand...

The question is bound to be whether anyone but drunken cowboy cowards need the bang-bangs, you pathetic bugger. Grow up and ask them to let you out into the modern world.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top