Question for evolutionists

[Into the Night]

The world knows where the banjo came from whether you and your compound "educated" spawn do or not. Cheers boy.

Irrelevance fallacy.

 

[kudzu]

Not my Bible. Inversion fallacy.

Your Bible and every other Bible.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?109346-Israel-vs-Judah

 

[CFM]

I doubt he ever read it. He keeps misquoting it.

Misquoting it's worse than not understanding it. That says he can't read well.

 

[CFM]

Define 'reality'. Define 'objective reality'. I know the answer to these two phrases. Let's see if you do.

To Fentoine, objective reality is what he believes and only what he believes.

 

[DarthPedant]

Science has no theories about past unobserved events. They are not falsifiable.

Both theories are religions.

Nice equivocation fallacy.

But lots of branches of science deals with forensically reconstructing unobserved past events. The entire branch of forensic science, to pick an obvious example.

This is just you making self serving definitions of ‘religion’ and ‘science‘. Well, not you specifically, since creationists have been pimping this empty rhetoric for years.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Into the Night]

Misquoting it's worse than not understanding it. That says he can't read well.

True. That does seem to be common with atheists. Their own fundamentalist religion blinds them.

 

[Into the Night]

Nice equivocation fallacy.

No equivocation at all. Fallacy fallacy.

But lots of branches of science deals with forensically reconstructing unobserved past events.

None.

The entire branch of forensic science, to pick an obvious example.

Forensic science has no theories about past unobserved events either.

This is just you making self serving definitions of ‘religion’ and ‘science‘.

Nope. Both are defined by philosophy.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all. It uses no supporting evidence. It uses no consensus.

Religion is best described as an initial circular argument with arguments extending from that. The circular argument by itself is not a fallacy. Failure to recognize it is.

Religion does not require a god or gods. Several religions have none. Atheism is a religion.
Anyone attempting to prove their religion is making the circular argument fallacy. This is what a fundamentalist does. Most atheists are fundamentalists.

Well, not you specifically, since creationists have been pimping this empty rhetoric for years.

Void argument. What 'rhetoric' are you referring to?

 

[domer76]

The Theory of Creation states that life came to this Earth through the action of some kind of intelligence. Nothing says the intelligence has any particular form. It doesn't even have to be a god or gods.
It is a nonscientific theory. It is not falsifiable.

The Theory of Abiogenesis states that life originated on this Earth through a series of random unspecified events. It is also a nonscientific theory. It is not falsifiable.

These theories are mutually exclusive of each other. One of them MUST be False.

Science has no theories about past unobserved events. They are not falsifiable.

Both theories are religions.

^I love it when fools humiliate themselves

 

[kudzu]

No equivocation at all. Fallacy fallacy.

None.

Forensic science has no theories about past unobserved events either.

Nope. Both are defined by philosophy.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all. It uses no supporting evidence. It uses no consensus.

Religion is best described as an initial circular argument with arguments extending from that. The circular argument by itself is not a fallacy. Failure to recognize it is.

Religion does not require a god or gods. Several religions have none. Atheism is a religion.
Anyone attempting to prove their religion is making the circular argument fallacy. This is what a fundamentalist does. Most atheists are fundamentalists.


Void argument. What 'rhetoric' are you referring to?

If atheism is a religion, then NOT collecting stamps is a hobby.

 

[domer76]

If atheism is a religion, then NOT collecting stamps is a hobby.

Hahahahaha

 

[kudzu]

Hahahahaha

These morons who claim atheism is a religion are too stupid for words.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

If atheism is a religion, then NOT collecting stamps is a hobby.

if you start proselytizing about not collecting stamps like you do atheism, then both of them will be your religion.........

 

[PostmodernProphet]

These morons who claim atheism is a religion are too stupid for words.

you have a catechism.......

 

[domer76]

you have a catechism.......

 

[DarthPedant]

No equivocation at all. Fallacy fallacy.

None.

Forensic science has no theories about past unobserved events either.

Nope. Both are defined by philosophy.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all. It uses no supporting evidence. It uses no consensus.

Religion is best described as an initial circular argument with arguments extending from that. The circular argument by itself is not a fallacy. Failure to recognize it is.

Religion does not require a god or gods. Several religions have none. Atheism is a religion.
Anyone attempting to prove their religion is making the circular argument fallacy. This is what a fundamentalist does. Most atheists are fundamentalists.


Void argument. What 'rhetoric' are you referring to?

I don’t accept any of your definitions. I don’t know why anyone should. It’s all self-serving rhetoric.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Into the Night]

If atheism is a religion, then NOT collecting stamps is a hobby.

Atheism claims there is no god or gods. That's a religion, dude.

 

[Into the Night]

These morons who claim atheism is a religion are too stupid for words.

Insulting people that disagree with you doesn't work.

 

[kudzu]

Insulting people that disagree with you doesn't work.

Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

 

[Into the Night]

I don’t accept any of your definitions. I don’t know why anyone should. It’s all self-serving rhetoric.

Not my definitions. You can't just deny philosophy.

 

[Into the Night]

Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

Atheism claims there is no god or gods. It is a religion.