No, if you watched the audiences, with an open mind, there's no way you wouldn't see it. You don't have to be a "body language expert" to read emotions on people's faces. All humans have that capability. I'm sure you know when someone you are around is angry with you, or has good news, or is signaling sexual desire. These are all human emotions that we can all read. Stop trying to mystify it. There's nothing mysterious about it. We can all tell when someone is angry. We can even judge degress of anger by someone's face. Be honest.
Racial Politics: Who Us? Noooo
- Thread starter Cancel7
- Start date
No, if you watched the audiences, with an open mind, there's no way you wouldn't see it. You don't have to be a "body language expert" to read emotions on people's faces. All humans have that capability. I'm sure you know when someone you are around is angry with you, or has good news, or is signaling sexual desire. These are all human emotions that we can all read. Stop trying to mystify it. There's nothing mysterious about it. We can all tell when someone is angry. We can even judge degress of anger by someone's face. Be honest.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO... so funny how it is something people actually study and that certain movements now have meanings that are fairly reliable to interpret. Because it was just last Wednesday when that was impossible to do.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
I do agree that it is possible to see the differences in body language. I was simply mocking emo boy who just last week acted as though it was impossible to do so.
He owes the entire republican party an apology as well. It is people like him that keep the party down.
Yeah, he suddenly is able to read body language when last week it was Sanskrit and Greek mixed together in an evil mutation.
I said "real contrast between the faces at the conventions."
I'll excuse how stupidly you & the Freak have surmised that this is "body language interpretation," because I know you're both head over heels and can't think straight...
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO... reading facial expressions is a part of interpretting body language you twit. Just admit you were wrong and be done with it.
It is easy for all to see that you are wrong... as you have fallen back on the liberal favorite "ur ghey" "insult".
Idiot; I said there was a contrast between the faces. How is that "reading facial expressions?"
Good lord, are you stupid.
LOL. Wow, incredible. Just incredible. Facial expressions are a portion of body language.
Jesus Christ; I KNOW that. Am I "reading" them? Am I "interpreting" them, as you did?
Debating you guys is like visiting the local 2nd grade picnic, except I don't think kids at that age are stupid for making those kinds of comments; they still have a long education ahead of them, so there is much more hope.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
ROFLMAO.... please tell me you are kidding. If you are seeing differences in their faces... ie... some look angry, others enthusiastic etc... you are reading and contrasting different facial expressions.
How the fuck else would you contrast differences in their faces????
Did you use "he has a big nose" thus must be angry?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
yes, you moron, you most certainly did. You said they looked ANGRY. That is making an observation based on their facial expressions. You do not KNOW that they were all angry... you are making an observation based on their body language.
Um... Yes.
You were saying that people study body language and that it is suddenly reliable.
I agree, there are people who study body language, just as I said last week as you tried to pretend that there was no possible way that it could be done. Suddenly agreeing in the "anger" of the R crowd (I agree, they are pissed at how their reps have stupidly overspent and are eager to correct it.)
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
"They really looked maniacal at times"
Yeah, that is not interpretting their expressions at all.... not one bit...
Yeah, that is not interpretting their expressions at all.... not one bit...
Okay, fellows. "You win."
My casual observation about the contrast in faces was EXACTLY like judging from Hillary's looking one way instead of the other during her speech was a clear sign that she wasn't really 100% behind Obama, and that her rolling her eyes to someone off camera - which Damo admitted was probably reacting to someone else - was also indicative that she didn't believe what she was saying about him.
You got me. Congrats, lovers....
My casual observation about the contrast in faces was EXACTLY like judging from Hillary's looking one way instead of the other during her speech was a clear sign that she wasn't really 100% behind Obama, and that her rolling her eyes to someone off camera - which Damo admitted was probably reacting to someone else - was also indicative that she didn't believe what she was saying about him.
You got me. Congrats, lovers....
I wasn't here for whatever you are going on about, but I was the one who said you could see the terrible anger on their faces and you could, and being able to discern facial expressions which indicate emotions, is not the same thing as reading body language.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
yes, the first is obvious once you resort to the underlined.
Tell us... why are you such a homophobe? Why do you think calling someone gay is an "insult"?
LOL. Again you deliberately change what I said about when she looked at somebody off camera. I said that one was an unfortunately timed communication between her and somebody off camera. Being deliberately disingenuous is your forte', especially when it concerns stuff like this. I gave an opinion (casual observation) of what I saw, but at that time it was totally incomprehensible that somebody may actually be able to interpret body language like that, today. Not so much. In fact it is suddenly "reliable" and people study it (exactly what I said previously, but you stated how impossible it was).... and you are able to see actually see and have an opinion on the body language of others. Suddenly you found the Rosetta stone.
This is probably one of the weakest moments I've ever seen from you, and that is saying something.
Really? I don’t think so. I can read people’s faces really well. But I don’t know much, if anything, about body language. I’ve read things like, if you want someone to feel comfortable with you, you should try and imitate their own body language. But I don’t bother with that kind of stuff, and I don’t know how to read subtle body language. I mean, I can tell if someone is getting ready to get violent, or throw up or something.