Well okay, if you want to lie and lie and lie Dix. You were arguing against me that a 12 inch rule could be divided into three equal 4 inch parts. You were saying that even with a tool that could cut such a ruler without any sawdust or fallout whatsoever, that the remaining parts would be close to 4 inches each, but couldn't possibly be exactly 4 inches.
You said the same thing about a mile being divided into 1760 foot equal pieces. You said it was close, but couldn't be EXACTLY 1760 feet. I mean really, what am I supposed to do with that? Let your stubborn ego redefine mathematics, and rudimentary, simple 3rd grade mathematics at that? No, you don't get away with that no matter how hard you stomp your feet. Its foolish and stubborn, not to mention totally fucking beyond stupid.
Not what I said, not in the context of how it was explained to you. I attempted to illustrate to your ignorant ass, that "4 inches" are a man-made unit of measure which represents "1/3" of a foot. You can divide a ruler into 3 equal 4 inch parts, just as I can divide 1 into 3 equal "1/3rds" but 1 still doesn't divide evenly by 3 without producing a remainder. This fact has nothing to do with my enormous and magnanimous ego.
Jesus you are one dense fucking neanderthal. She's popular among the choir. She's galvanizing the religious right, and alienating the real right, you know, the ones that worry about government and all that without putting Jeebus first. You know, those that actually do not want theocracy? Maybe you don't know and are just pretending again, not a surprise.
I think we need to put Jeebus first, especially if it means we can slash the size and scope of government and stop the massive deficit spending. I don't fear a theocracy because the First Amendment prohibits it, and I don't think we're going to abolish that. How is she "galvanizing the religious right" exactly? I don't see her out there preaching, she isn't on TV hosting the 700 club... or a revival... Heck, from a 'policy' standpoint, she is pretty consistently libertarian, and advocates 'states rights' with all the major social issues. Ya, she believes in God, but seriously... you think the GOP is going to nominate an Atheist? Really?
The people who actually care about issues and not taglines, are not going to vote for her, and she'll hang herself in the end.
Well I thought she had hung herself already? Isn't that what we keep being told? I think the issue most conservative people care about, is balancing the budget and reducing the size and scope of government. I also think, in order to do that, we need to roll back a lot of this liberal ideology we've adopted in recent years. It doesn't bother me to have someone who isn't ashamed of being conservative, and not afraid to articulate core conservative values. If that pisses off liberal special interests, I don't really care. I kind of expect that it will.
And gee whiz, the fact that you've been blathering on and on about how she's the real deal, your kind of conservative for the last two years does make me think that you're married to her. You can't stop blathering on and on and on, almost like you're defending the fact that 1/3 does not, and cannot exist. Its the same lame, ego driven drivel as ever.
Again, you state an absurd claim of me saying something that I have never said, and an argument of absurdity that I would never make, and have never made, but you have imagined the argument in your mind. "1/3" is a fractional representation of value. It isn't a value. It is vital to all mathematics that "1/3" exist, and must exist, for mathematics to even work, and for us to divide things into parts we can assume to be equal.
As for Palin, I did say she was "the real deal" from the start, I likened her to having the charisma of Ronald Reagan, very early on. I still say, she has tremendous charisma and appeal to "common" folk... you know, the people who make up MOST of America? If she didn't, I doubt there would literally be terabytes of data online smearing and besmirching Sarah Palin from the left. (and right)...
'The Political Machine' doesn't like Sarah Palin, and they are going to do everything they can, to destroy the threat she poses. Now, it's not really hard to get leftist proles and pinheads to hate Sarah Palin, they're used to hating... and the "voices of reason" keep crying, NO... we can't nominate Palin... we don't dare go there... if we do, it's a mistake... she's not electable... high negatives.... And when I hear that part, I usually start to blow steam out my ears. I don't vote for people based on whether or not other people like them. I listen to what they say they want to do, how they are going to do it, and why they have the best way to get that done, and this is how I cast my vote. None of that has yet happened in the Elections of 2012, not a single speech, not single candidate. It's just a bit early to decide you can't vote for Sarah Palin, or anyone else.
You obviously love every last thing about her. Why deny it? Seriously? Is it an attempt to appear objective and open minded? Because if it is my friend, it has failed, and failed ugly.
Hey, I do like me some Sarah Barracuda in tight jeans!! I mean, think of how cool it will be to whack off during the State of the Union? ...Sorry, just trying to find the 'silver lining' for you, Beefster... no offense!
