It also means they can't prove they have that many members either.
So since they refuse to disclose that information, we have to assume they're lying.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Senate Report: Kremlin Used NRA To Help Funnel Money To Trump Campaign
- Thread starter floridafan
- Start date
It also means they can't prove they have that many members either.
So since they refuse to disclose that information, we have to assume they're lying.
It also means they can't prove they have that many members either.
Why do they need to prove anything? Aren't you the one who made the claim?
So since they refuse to disclose that information, we have to assume they're lying.
We do? By what logic?
How would you like me to prove it?
Anyway you can that's verifiable.
I'll understand if you can't, of course.
Oh yea, the standard conservative reply, "BUT HILLARY!"
I didn't mention Hillary.
Did I?
Why do they need to prove anything? Aren't you the one who made the claim?
No, they're the ones who claimed their membership spiked. Try to follow the thread. I know you get confused easily, but you can very simply just go back through the posts to see what we were talking about.
Maybe try typing with your head pulled out of your ass instead of crammed up in it?
You are not tricky, merely transparent and predictable.
I didn't mention Hillary.
Did I?
We do? By what logic?
By the fact that they refuse to support their claims.
Anyway you can that's verifiable.
Such as? You're speaking very vaguely here. I think that's deliberate because you don't really have anything to contribute.
Such as? You're speaking very vaguely here. I think that's deliberate because you don't really have anything to contribute.
What you purport to "think" isn't the issue.
You made a claim. Can you back it up with evidence, or not?
By the fact that they refuse to support their claims.
Why do they need to verify their membership numbers with you?
You are not tricky, merely transparent and predictable.
Is this your admission that I did not mention Hillary?
What you purport to "think" isn't the issue.
You made a claim. Can you back it up with evidence, or not?
Wait a second...I asked you for specifics in order to satisfy this false request of yours, and you suddenly clam up?
Try not to be vague when you say things.
Why do they need to verify their membership numbers with you?
They're the ones who are making wild claims without support.
Ok, who was you taking about? The Ghosts of Christmas past?
Hilarious. As if you didn't hate Reagan, too?
Did Russians pay half a million dollars to Trumps' spouse for a single speech and donate millions to his foundation while the Uranium One deal was in the balance?
Is this your admission that I did not mention Hillary?
They're the ones who are making wild claims without support.
Is that right?
What "wild claims", specifically?
Ok, who was you taking about? The Ghosts of Christmas past?
I asked a question.
You assumed, it seems.
Is that right?
What "wild claims", specifically?
That their membership spiked. You know, the thing that prompted our discussion.
You seem lost. Are you senile?
To who's spouse did you refer?
I asked a question.
You assumed, it seems.
That their membership spiked. You know, the thing that prompted our discussion. You seem lost. Are you senile?
First of all, it wasn't the NRA that stated that gun group membership spiked, was it?
And for that to be a "wild claim", you need proof that it isn't true, which you admittedly don't have.
To who's spouse did you refer?
If you will trouble to read my original question, only one individual is named.