How is it a logical fallacy? It's simple fact.
No it is not. It is a slippery slope argument. As if the other 8 would die and there would be zero new appointments.
How is it a logical fallacy? It's simple fact.
Ok, so no vote, I guess the appointment should just be automatic, without a vote consent must be assumed.
LMFAO. You can't back up your claim so you make a ridiculous logical fallacy.
If they don't vite how could any of the eight appointments get throughNo it is not. It is a slippery slope argument. As if the other 8 would die and there would be zero new appointments.
No it is not. It is a slippery slope argument. As if the other 8 would die and there would be zero new appointments.
Set your authority that there doesn't need to be a vote
Ok, so no vote, I guess the appointment should just be automatic, without a vote consent must be assumed.
If they don't vite how could any of the eight appointments get through
You think they should subvert the will of the people and the last presidential election and give the president only a three-year term?
You think the Supreme Court should be left with a vacancy for over a year, just to serve your political agenda?
One of the duties of the elected president is to appoint Supreme Court justices. The reason the Republicans might delay acting on any of President Obama's appointment would be to try and delay it until a new president is elected. In fact this is subverting the last presidential election and disregarding the the will of the people in that election.
President Obama has 341 days left in his term.
Ok, so no vote, I guess the appointment should just be automatic, without a vote consent must be assumed.
Best news I've gotten in a while.
Wish it would have been you. Do us all a favor and do a Beefy