No it is hypocritical, (for Sen. Clinton) but its one of the reasons HRC is not going to be the Democratic nominee. Democrats reject that type of campaign. The right seems to fall for it every time!
Something NEW to frighten the Right.
- Thread starter Socrtease
- Start date
No it is hypocritical, (for Sen. Clinton) but its one of the reasons HRC is not going to be the Democratic nominee. Democrats reject that type of campaign. The right seems to fall for it every time!
cawacko
Well-known member
It's not hypocritical to say someone else shouldn't run this type of campaign and then go run that campaign yourself?
He just said it WAS hypocritical, what is your problem cawacko? You are spending too much time reading Damo's posts.
cawacko
Well-known member
oh yeah, my bad. Sorry Jarod. I saw the no and then I saw a non-existent 'not' in there as well. Sorry about that.
The whole "Dems are finally waking up to the Clintons" is such BS. First of all, the campaign against Bush was the economy, and the campaign against Dole was practically nothing. Hillary's Senate campaigns were a breeze. It's just wrong to say "this is how they campaign," because they have never hyped a Republican opponent over a Democratic contender, and they have never used race to divide before. The tactics in this campaign, for the most part, are not "same ol', same ol'" from the Clintons.
As far as Clinton's Presidency, he worked with Republicans infinitely more than Bush has or ever would with Democrats, and like it or not, he was a good steward of the economy & of foreign policy. He actually pissed a lot of liberals off in the '90's. Enough with this "well, libs are finally waking up..."
As far as Clinton's Presidency, he worked with Republicans infinitely more than Bush has or ever would with Democrats, and like it or not, he was a good steward of the economy & of foreign policy. He actually pissed a lot of liberals off in the '90's. Enough with this "well, libs are finally waking up..."
There's still hope for you. Damo would have insisted that's what he meant, and then made 100 "rubbish" posts defending it, until finally claiming "that's not what I meant'.
You've been pulled back from the abyss!
Yes, thats what I said, are you blind by your desire to make a point?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I agree.
No prob...
It had nothing to do with Democrats.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
while I wholeheartedly disagree with Thomas' view of greatly expanded authority to the CinC during 'wartime', most of his opinions are quite clearly constitutional and downright awesome.
