Stoicism vs. Materialism

Stop lying.

Why don't you just stop trolling for a change? You know, try engaging with the topic. Do you or do you not think you know the mental capabilities of another primate that you cannot communicate with? If so, how. HOW does Cypress know the mental capabilities of an orangutan.

Or just go ahead and troll some more.
 
Why don't you just stop trolling for a change? You know, try engaging with the topic. Do you or do you not think you know the mental capabilities of another primate that you cannot communicate with? If so, how. HOW does Cypress know the mental capabilities of an orangutan.

Or just go ahead and troll some more.

You are lying. You never took a philosophy class.
 
You are lying.

LOL...the fake "artist". Just like Doc and his imaginary helicopter funtimes. You are as pathetic as Doc and Cypress. At least Cypress fakes being an intellectual better than YOU DO. You suck at it. You come across as an anencephalic toad.

(Feel free to google any words you don't know...which is probably most of them)
 
go kill yourself
go kill yourself you piece of shit
go kill yourself you worthless troll
go kill yourself you worthless troll
go kill yourself you worthless troll
go kill yourself you worthless troll
go kill yourself you worthless troll
go kill yourself you piece of shit
go kill yourself you piece of shit
I hope you and your fascist brethren are put to death.
go kill yourself you piece of shit troll

^^^^^This is the person I'm debating right now.
 
Science tells us that we cannot know that which we cannot know. So when Cypress makes the positive claim that orangutans are incapable of integral calculus either:

1. Cypress knows something no one on earth does (ie Cypress thinks he can read the minds of other animals)
OR
2. Cypress was incorrect in that no one knows what the mathematical capabilities are of any given non-human primate (or non-human animal of any sort) that we are unable to communicate with.

Now the kind of philosophy that Cypress prefers (Agnosticism) would lead one to assume that Cypress would likewise be agnostic about those things he can't possibly know. But Cypress is NOT. Cypress is firmly positive that an animal whose mind he cannot possibly know is incapable of something.

This leads to a deeper question: why is Cypress "agnostic" about things like God etc, but NOT on things like the content of other minds which he can't possibly have a way of knowing?

This is incredibly incoherent and shows a significant lack of understanding of the topic by Cypress.

In fact it shows an amazing hole in Cypress's world view. He doesn't even understand the philosophy he supposedly espouses.
 
6a5a51b7caec7a723bfd580aca0c5836.png

You are as pathetic as Doc and Cypress. At least Cypress fakes being an intellectual better than YOU DO.
I disagree. BidenPresident edges out Terry and Cypress. Cypress exclusively broadcasts that he is an across-the-board moron who is relegated to copy-pasting from the internet. Terry is an annoying across-the-board moron who is desperate for attention and who instantly agrees with everything that Cypress posts out of fear of losing his only friend.

attachment.php

ba7704b18a87e54b8f4577b682bfb589.png

terry-spanky.gif

BidenPresident is just a shitty person at times. Big deal.

f59477d2d1b52c8c6c516119f9ebf42b.png
 
The Hubble telescope can see 14B years into space.
Photons that reach our eyes or telescope lenses do not contain XML tags denoting their point of origin, i.e. The temporal reach back in time of any visage of the stars is unknown.

We have no idea what exists beyond that.
"We" have practically no idea what exists between earth and all that we can observe. Our knowledge of that which exists just within the sphere of abservabioity is essentially zero. People, such as Cypress, will assure you that their erroneous speculations are thettled thienth.
 
Back
Top