The Day the Democrats Putinized America

Earl

Well-known member
The Day the Democrats Putinized America

European Conservative


The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024


On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty

The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.

The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.

The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.

When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.

The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.


From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.

Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.
 
The Day the Democrats Putinized America

European Conservative


The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024


On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty

The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.

The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.

The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.

When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.

The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.


From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.

Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.
Trump is America's biggest Putin fan.
Isn't the irony delicious, Vandy Clown?
 
Boy...am I glad to see the MAGA morons here feeling the pain.

You people have done your best to destroy America...and you deserve all as much punishment as that fat-assed POS is due.
 
With the way things are going, and will get worse -inflation, American troops attacking Russia from the ground in Ukraine, alienating the black and Jewish vote, the border being worse, and hegemonic wars, the ME on fire and China looming, the DP is setting itself up for an historic defeat they can't cheat their way out of. This happens if sanity and cool heads prevail. The Party of war, slavery, KKK, presidential assassinations, and hate. Why did it take inflation to wake people up? No matter; it does. It has to hurt for people to care. People are definately hurting. Sky high credit card rats (thanks Joe) and inflation are going to run them out of time and options as the summer plays out.
 
Of course the decision will be reversed on fast track appeal to the Supreme Court...5-4 decision.
New York state law, not Federal law.

There's no plausible path to appeal it to SCOTUS until it has exhausted the New York state appellate court system
 
New York state law, not Federal law.

There's no plausible path to appeal it to SCOTUS until it has exhausted the New York state appellate court system
Fast track to the S.C.

Federal courts can hear challenges to state criminal convictions pursuant to petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. While early Supreme Court cases interpreted that authority narrowly, subsequent cases allowed for broader federal review of state court convictions

Get a clue.
 
New York state law, not Federal law.

There's no plausible path to appeal it to SCOTUS until it has exhausted the New York state appellate court system
the 6th amendment applies to state court decisions..........the federal courts may fast track cases of significant national interest........now, I wonder if the first ever prosecution of a presidential candidate in a trial with multiple constitutional violations could be of significant national interest.....

Bush v Gore (2000) is an example.....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top