The Day the Democrats Putinized America

The Day the Democrats Putinized America

European Conservative


The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024


On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty

The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.

The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.

The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.

When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.

The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.


From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.

Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.
https://europeanconservative.com/ar...arl, post: 5995980, member: 7558"] [/QUOTE]
The Day the Democrats Putinized America

European Conservative


The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024


On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty

The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.

The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.

The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.

When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.

The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.


From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.

Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.

Nailed it. :thumbsup:
 
Is the middle finger an acceptable substitute for moaning?
It can't be.
I launched a formal protest on your behalf.

Indeed. Here's one for you:

jack-nicholson-middle-finger.gif
 
Boy...am I glad to see the MAGA morons here feeling the pain.

:lolup: Doesn't think he's the moron. Voting for Biden is the surest sign of stupidity, ignorance and being a moron. :laugh:

You people have done your best to destroy America...and you deserve all as much punishment as that fat-assed POS is due.

Only a dumb cunt like you thinks that Biden isn't destroying this country with his incompetence, hos Fascism, his serial lying and senility.
 
The Day the Democrats Putinized America

European Conservative


The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024


On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty

The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.

The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.

The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.

When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.

The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.


From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.

Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.
And who was one of the first and few foreign leaders to attack the Trump verdict, Vladimir Putin (https://www.reuters.com/world/kreml...s-are-using-all-means-get-rid-him-2024-05-31/)
 
ironically Russian collusion was a lie produced by Hilliary who deducted it as a legal expense instead of a campaign contribution......

......and was fined for that criminality which led to a two-year $55 million taxpayer funded witch hunt that went nowhere. Americans should be ashamed to even admit they vote Democratic. But that would require a brain.
 
the 6th amendment applies to state court decisions..........the federal courts may fast track cases of significant national interest........now, I wonder if the first ever prosecution of a presidential candidate in a trial with multiple constitutional violations could be of significant national interest.....

Bush v Gore (2000) is an example.....

:thumbsup:
 
It's fun when your hypocrisy is shown on the Right. You expended so many years DEMANDING Hillary be locked up by you never got around to charging her or getting it done. Now your guy is facing the gavel of justice and you are losing your collective shit.

All those years of you MAGAts screaming "Fuck your feelings" and "Librul tears" are coming home to roost now. Doesn't feel great, does it?

Well, again, take your party's advice and "fuck your feelings"

You're everything you accuse the right of. You would need some self-awareness and a brain to comprehend the obvious. :palm:
 
Here in America we like to use the COURTS to mete out justice. I suggest you try that if you think you have a case against Hillary.

You guys have literally had like 30+ years to put Hillary behind bars. What's the hold-up? Are you a bunch of pussies being pushed around by lil ol' Hillary? LOL.

Meanwhile a jury of your orange messiah's peers have found him unanimously guilty on 34 counts.

See? If you want to "lock someone up" that's how you do it!

jack-nicholson-middle-finger.gif
 
Since when is a trial by a jury of one's peers a "violation of the Constitution"?

Why do you hate America so?????

More evidence of your ignorancde and stupidity. The actions of the Judge and the DA in this case violated Constitutional protections.

I wish you had a brain. Really, I do. Then we wouldn't need to educate in order to even have a debate.
 
Back
Top