The ones who know, Trumper.Who told you that????
Professor Turley, Professor Dershowitz etc.
Where have you been, Trumper?
The ones who know, Trumper.Who told you that????
The Day the Democrats Putinized America
European Conservative
The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024
On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty
The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.
The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.
The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.
When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.
The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.
From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.
Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.
https://europeanconservative.com/ar...arl, post: 5995980, member: 7558"] [/QUOTE]
The Day the Democrats Putinized America
European Conservative
The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024
On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty
The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.
The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.
The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.
When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.
The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.
From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.
Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.
The Day the Democrats Putinized America
The guilty verdict against Trump is a crucial watershed moment for America, politically, constitutionally, and morally.europeanconservative.com
Merchan controlled the jury selection......I want to know if the jury pool was selected by the same person that selected Merchan. Something smells.
Trump is America's biggest Putin fan.
Isn't the irony delicious, Vandy Clown?
are you accusing the jury of being 100% made up of Trump's inferiors?........if soRemind me how many Republicans were on the jury.?
That's why they should have droned his ass instead of trying him.
Is the middle finger an acceptable substitute for moaning?
It can't be.
I launched a formal protest on your behalf.
Boy...am I glad to see the MAGA morons here feeling the pain.
You people have done your best to destroy America...and you deserve all as much punishment as that fat-assed POS is due.
What is the difference between Trump and Stormy Daniels?
One is an over-weight, bleached blond with big tits.
The other is an ex-porn attress.
And who was one of the first and few foreign leaders to attack the Trump verdict, Vladimir Putin (https://www.reuters.com/world/kreml...s-are-using-all-means-get-rid-him-2024-05-31/)The Day the Democrats Putinized America
European Conservative
The Day the Democrats Putinized America
Sven R. Larson
May 31, 2024
On Thursday, May 30th, a jury of 12 New Yorkers erased the last distinctive line between Biden’s America and Putin’s Russia. With their verdict against Donald Trump, finding him guilty on 34 counts of forging business records, they verified that the Democrat party—the party of the sitting president—can organize a trial with its party operatives as judge and prosecutor, and get their political opponent found guilty
The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is an entrenched Democrat who has been selected to prosecute more Republicans than just Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, judges were selected randomly; from now on, ‘random’ means a Democrat when the defendant is a Republican.
The prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, was elected to the position as District Attorney of Manhattan after having campaigned on a promise to prosecute—more appropriately persecute—Donald Trump. In the America that we all knew before Biden came into office, a DA had to first investigate a case before he could judge whether or not to file charges against anyone.
The crimes that Bragg charged Trump with all fall under federal law. Back in the America we all knew before Biden came into office, a state district attorney like Alvin Bragg had no jurisdiction to prosecute under federal law.
When Judge Merchan sent the jury off to deliberate, he told them that they did not have to all agree on what crime Trump was guilty of. The 34 counts were all one and the same crime, but Merchan told them that they could pick and choose: some jurors might think that Trump had violated federal election law; some could find him guilty of tax violations; others could select the “falsification of business records” option.
The judge also—amazingly—told the jury they did not have to be unanimous in their decision.
From Europe is this fine expose of the Democrats vileness in their law-fare actions.
Read the rest of this well thought out post showing the many cracks in the actions of the trial.
The Day the Democrats Putinized America
The guilty verdict against Trump is a crucial watershed moment for America, politically, constitutionally, and morally.europeanconservative.com
Yes we will. He who laughs last laughs the hardest.Well, counsellor, we will wait and see I suppose.
ironically Russian collusion was a lie produced by Hilliary who deducted it as a legal expense instead of a campaign contribution......
One has only one penis the other has multiple penises at the same time.What a moronic question. One has a penis and the other has a vagina, much like you.
Trump doesn't give a shit what brain dead morons on the left think.
New York state law, not Federal law.
There's no plausible path to appeal it to SCOTUS until it has exhausted the New York state appellate court system
the 6th amendment applies to state court decisions..........the federal courts may fast track cases of significant national interest........now, I wonder if the first ever prosecution of a presidential candidate in a trial with multiple constitutional violations could be of significant national interest.....
Bush v Gore (2000) is an example.....
So much drama. May I recommend that you take the advice your party always gives in times of difficulty: Fuck your feelings.
It's fun when your hypocrisy is shown on the Right. You expended so many years DEMANDING Hillary be locked up by you never got around to charging her or getting it done. Now your guy is facing the gavel of justice and you are losing your collective shit.
All those years of you MAGAts screaming "Fuck your feelings" and "Librul tears" are coming home to roost now. Doesn't feel great, does it?
Well, again, take your party's advice and "fuck your feelings"
Here in America we like to use the COURTS to mete out justice. I suggest you try that if you think you have a case against Hillary.
You guys have literally had like 30+ years to put Hillary behind bars. What's the hold-up? Are you a bunch of pussies being pushed around by lil ol' Hillary? LOL.
Meanwhile a jury of your orange messiah's peers have found him unanimously guilty on 34 counts.
See? If you want to "lock someone up" that's how you do it!
Since when is a trial by a jury of one's peers a "violation of the Constitution"?
Why do you hate America so?????
Who told you that????