The Jew Hating white lib LEFT ban Pro Israel speakers at Berkeley - Jew free zones

moon said:
Just adhere to the law, Bigdoggie- and all will be well in the Middle East. United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/19 recognizes the state of Palestine on the pre-1967 borders- and implicitly its sovereignty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_resolution_67/19

Occupation is illegal. Annexation is illegal. The Zionists are illegal occupiers and their attempts at annexation will never be recognized. There will never be a ' Greater Israel '.
Zionists- go home- while you still have one.
Click to expand...

An UNGAR is just an official recommendation that is non binding. It is not a law. :palm:

What are the pre 1967 borders? ... map, please.
 
moon said:
They're backed by law- or they wouldn't pass.



The pre 1967 borders

( The Green Line )

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Line_(Israel)
Click to expand...

Thank you.

Thank you for providing proof that your Nazi white lib Prof is lying to everyone about the 181 partitions ... magically transforming into international borders.


Map from your link ...
United_Nations_Palestine_map_showing_Armistice_Agreements_between_Israel_%26_Lebanon%2C_Syria%2C_Jordan_%26_Egypt_1949-1950.jpg
 
Bigdog said:
Thank you.

Thank you for providing proof that your Nazi white lib Prof is lying to everyone about the 181 partitions ... magically transforming into international borders.
Click to expand...

He's not lying. His qualified legal opinion, based upon international law, is that the 181 borders are the legal borders. The territory gained by the Zionists , that is the difference between the Green Line and the 181 borders , is challenged as being territory gained by force since the legal partition . That's a serious legal opinion- not a 'lie' as you shamefully call it.
However, in accepting the pre-1967 borders as the boundary of the sovereign state of Palestine all parties are aware that that boundary can be challenged under international law at a later date. The pre-1967 borders are the borders mentioned in Resolution 242- and they will do for now as they are accepted by the UN and 138 countries. Should the Palestinians content themselves with the Green Line and formally agree to that by treaty then those borders would become finalized and Palestine would lose claim to its stolen territory as international law states that borders CAN be changed by agreement.
Therein lies the difference between moderate and hard-line Palestinian opinion.
 
Last edited:
Dismantling Israel’s illegal occupation is a sine qua non for Palestinian right to self-determination: UN expert

27 October 2022

Albanese’s report found that the Israeli occupation violates Palestinian territorial sovereignty by seizing, annexing, fragmenting, and transferring its civilian population to the occupied territory. The occupation endangers the cultural existence of the Palestinian people by erasing or appropriating symbols expressing Palestinian identity and violates Palestinians’ ability to organise themselves as a people, free from alien domination and control, by repressing Palestinian political activity, advocacy and activism.

“This is, in essence, proof of the intent to colonise the occupied territory, and manifests Israel’s policies of domination through the “strategic fragmentation” of the occupied territory,” the expert said.

According to the report, the international community’s political, humanitarian, and economic approaches to resolving the Israel/Palestine “conflict” have failed without exception.

“These approaches conflate root causes with symptoms and serve to normalise Israel’s illegal occupation instead of challenging it. This is immoral and renders the regulatory and remedial function of international law futile,” Albanese said.

The report calls for “a paradigm shift”, which entails moving away from the narrative of “conflict” between Israel and the Palestine and recognising Israel’s “intentionally acquisitive, segregationist and repressive settler-colonial occupation.”

Albanese urged the international community to formally acknowledge and condemn the settler-colonial nature of the Israeli occupation, demand an immediate end to the illegal occupation, and call on Israel to withdraw its military presence and support to Israeli civilians in the colonies. She cautioned all States against making withdrawal subject to negotiations between Israel and Palestine.

“Meaningful discussions on a political solution for Palestine can only begin when the illegal occupation is dismantled once and for all,” the expert said.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-rele...alF5PFd1kNEcrrPt7JgjKRd7kOPCChB49KPzf_T3EP16E
 
Bigdog said:
..."your Nazi white lib Prof is lying to everyone "
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean this guy;

MR. ANTHONY D’AMATO
Leighton Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law
Anthony D'Amato is the Leighton Professor of Law at Northwestern University School
of Law, where he teaches courses in international law, international human rights,
analytic jurisprudence, and justice. He received his law degree from Harvard Law
School and a Ph.D. from Columbia University. He is admitted to practice before the
U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Tax Court, and several U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal, and
is a member of the New York Bar. Professor D'Amato was the first American lawyer to
argue (and win) a case before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, and
he has litigated a number of human rights cases around the world. He is the author of
over 20 books and over 110 articles. Biographies of Professor D’Amato can be found
in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in American Education, and Who’s Who in
American Law.
Click to expand...


You've embarrassed yourself enough, Bigdoggie. You're done.
 
There is no Palestine. They have no country and the so called Palestinians are controlled by the terrorist group and funded by Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism.

A gutter society of terrorists.
 
Earl said:
There is no Palestine. They have no country and the so called Palestinians are controlled by the terrorist group and funded by Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism.

A gutter society of terrorists.
Click to expand...

There is no ' Earl'- just a puff of methane in the intellectual desert.

flag-ani.gif
 
moon said:
He's not lying. His qualified legal opinion, based upon international law, is that the 181 borders are the legal borders. The territory gained by the Zionists , that is the difference between the Green Line and the 181 borders , is challenged as being territory gained by force since the legal partition . That's a serious legal opinion- not a 'lie' as you shamefully call it.
However, in accepting the pre-1967 borders as the boundary of the sovereign state of Palestine all parties are aware that that boundary can be challenged under international law at a later date. The pre-1967 borders are the borders mentioned in Resolution 242- and they will do for now as they are accepted by the UN and 138 countries. Should the Palestinians content themselves with the Green Line and formally agree to that by treaty then those borders would become finalized and Palestine would lose claim to its stolen territory as international law states that borders CAN be changed by agreement.
Therein lies the difference between moderate and hard-line Palestinian opinion.
Click to expand...

He IS lying. The Brits refused to implement the partitions.
 
moon said:
Oh, you mean this guy;

You've embarrassed yourself enough, Bigdoggie. You're done.
Click to expand...

We have a female justice who can't define what a woman is.
:dunno:

That guy is a looney toon. The international law, lawyers of the U.N. and of 193 nations disagree with that lifelong lib teacher, nutcase's opinion.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top