The jury

domer76 said:
Her testimony appears to be irrelevant. The paper trail of the payments was a slam dunk. The jury decided that immediately. The felony came on Cohen’s and Pecker’s corroborating testimonies regarding the intent of the payments.
Click to expand...
What 'paper trail'? You still have not specified a crime.
 
domer76 said:
Her testimony appears to be irrelevant. The paper trail of the payments was a slam dunk. The jury decided that immediately. The felony came on Cohen’s and Pecker’s corroborating testimonies regarding the intent of the payments.
Click to expand...
It might 'seem' irrelevant, but the defense was going to make the case that she was an extortionist who was lying about the sex. Prosecution decided to make sure there was no question about what did and didn't happen. trump was going to make a reality show episode of the trial, so the prosecution opted to act in kind.
 
Althea said:
It might 'seem' irrelevant, but the defense was going to make the case that she was an extortionist who was lying about the sex. Prosecution decided to make sure there was no question about what did and didn't happen. trump was going to make a reality show episode of the trial, so the prosecution opted to act in kind.
Click to expand...
She may or may not be. The fact remains that there was a paper trail of illegal payments and testimony of two others to corroborate why.

There’s no way to determine whether the trier of fact used her testimony at all in their verdict.
 
All the prosecutor had to do was point ti Trump and say he was the lying president of all-time, over 30,000 lies in 4 years. Then point to Cohen, who Trump claims is a liar. He worked for Trump for 10 years. Lying was his job. Then point out that Weisselberg is the jail a second time for perjury. Lying and cheating is Trump's business model and how he lives and works. Liik around and those called liars have one thing in common, Trump.
 
Nordberg said:
All the prosecutor had to do was point ti Trump and say he was the lying president of all-time, over 30,000 lies in 4 years. Then point to Cohen, who Trump claims is a liar. He worked for Trump for 10 years. Lying was his job. Then point out that Weisselberg is the jail a second time for perjury. Lying and cheating is Trump's business model and how he lives and works. Liik around and those called liars have one thing in common, Trump.
Click to expand...
I suspect the jury believed Trump was guilty from the beginning.
 
domer76 said:
She may or may not be. The fact remains that there was a paper trail of illegal payments and testimony of two others to corroborate why.

There’s no way to determine whether the trier of fact used her testimony at all in their verdict.
Click to expand...
Her testimony establishes what Trump was trying to hide from the voters. Some of them might have had second thoughts when they heard that Trump fucked a porn star because she looked like his daughter.
 
Concart said:
Her testimony establishes what Trump was trying to hide from the voters. Some of them might have had second thoughts when they heard that Trump fucked a porn star because she looked like his daughter.
Click to expand...

Wrong. Her testimony is irrelevant. What she and Trump did between the sheets is irrelevant.
 
Nordberg said:
All the prosecutor had to do was point ti Trump and say he was the lying president of all-time, over 30,000 lies in 4 years. Then point to Cohen, who Trump claims is a liar. He worked for Trump for 10 years. Lying was his job. Then point out that Weisselberg is the jail a second time for perjury. Lying and cheating is Trump's business model and how he lives and works. Liik around and those called liars have one thing in common, Trump.
Click to expand...
All that is nothing but a red herring and as far as "evidence" it is hearsay since it is based on third party opinions in the MSM.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Wrong. Her testimony is irrelevant. What she and Trump did between the sheets is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Her testimony showed that Cohen and other Trump were involved in the payoffs, The between the sheets talk was how Trump's lawyers were trying to make it about sex. Did you hear Susan Necheles's questioning? She was dragging it down.
 
Nordberg said:
Her testimony showed that Cohen and other Trump were involved in the payoffs, The between the sheets talk was how Trump's lawyers were trying to make it about sex. Did you hear Susan Necheles's questioning? She was dragging it down.
Click to expand...
Everybody already knew that. Her testimony was worthless and irrelevant.
 
domer76 said:
She may or may not be. The fact remains that there was a paper trail of illegal payments and testimony of two others to corroborate why.

There’s no way to determine whether the trier of fact used her testimony at all in their verdict.
Click to expand...
Who might that be?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top