The Left and One Party Rule

No one is suggesting an equal division of rewards. Those who struggle and succeed will always have more than those who were not successful and so it should be. The amount of help they would give would not result in them having to struggle.

But they are struggling now!
And the dear leader has indicated that those who work will pay more.
Never would he consider cutting the huge payouts to the lazy on welfare.
Never would the dear leader consider investigating fraud in EBT claims!
 
You're the one full of shit. I gave examples of struggling. Struggling to put in a back yard pool or struggling to put dinner on the table? Struggling to save for a yacht or struggling to save for their children's education?

How about you give some examples of people making $300,000 or $500,000 or $1,000,000 struggling? Let's see some substance to your asinine comments/beliefs.

Those people, who saved scrimped and struggled to build a buisness, taking huge risks, they struggled to get ahead, they earned their yacht, their pool etc.
The left dont see that. They see money and don't care how it was earned , probably because the left wingers never earned their income.
 
If those people WANT to help everyone/anyone fine. But they shouldn't be FORCED to do anything. That's called freedom.

No, that's called selfishness. Society, from roads to communication systems, have been built over generations. For example, a person owning a trucking company benefits far more from the highway system than the average commuter so is expected to help more according to their income. A telemarketing company benefits far more from the telephone/communication system than the average Joe. Internet companies benefit from the internet far more than the average person.

Perhaps a reminder of how society operates and how people benefit from those who came before them.

"Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised.

All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer's medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance - now Joe gets it too.

He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.

In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.

Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air.

He walks on the government-provided sidewalk to subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work. It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.

Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe's employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't want his employees to call the union.

If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn't think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.

It is noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe's deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.

Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime. Joe also forgets that his in addition to his federally subsidized student loans, he attended a state funded university.

Joe is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car safety standards to go along with the tax-payer funded roads.

He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers' Home Administration because bankers didn't want to make rural loans.

The house didn't have electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded rural electrification.

He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to.

Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn't mention that the beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: "We don't need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I'm a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have."
 
You're the one full of shit. I gave examples of struggling. Struggling to put in a back yard pool or struggling to put dinner on the table? Struggling to save for a yacht or struggling to save for their children's education?

How about you give some examples of people making $300,000 or $500,000 or $1,000,000 struggling? Let's see some substance to your asinine comments/beliefs.

Those people, who saved scrimped and struggled to build a buisness, taking huge risks, they struggled to get ahead, they earned their yacht, their pool etc.
The left dont see that. They see money and don't care how it was earned , probably because the left wingers never earned their income.
 
No, that's called selfishness. Society, from roads to communication systems, have been built over generations.

I may be a little late to this but roads and communication systems aren't an issue.

Tax payers, paying for people to have babies, and sit on their ass is.

Also, when a welfare recipient smokes or drinks, and I'm (the tax payer) paying for it.

Am I selfish because I don't want my money taken to give out as welfare checks?
 
You're the one full of shit. I gave examples of struggling. Struggling to put in a back yard pool or struggling to put dinner on the table? Struggling to save for a yacht or struggling to save for their children's education?

How about you give some examples of people making $300,000 or $500,000 or $1,000,000 struggling? Let's see some substance to your asinine comments/beliefs.

I'm not the one who wants someone who's stuggled to reach that $300,000 or $500,000 or $1,000,000 level, to keep struggling for someone else's benefit.
The idea of "stuggling" is to finally reach a stage, where you no longer have to struggle.

You want a world of grasshoppers living off the work of the ant.
 
I may be a little late to this but roads and communication systems aren't an issue.

Tax payers, paying for people to have babies, and sit on their ass is.

Also, when a welfare recipient smokes or drinks, and I'm (the tax payer) paying for it.

Am I selfish because I don't want my money taken to give out as welfare checks?

The poor are not banned from using the things that the Kanadian point out.
They are allowed access to them, just like everyone else is.
The Kanadians wants some kind of StarTrek society, where those who choose not to take risks and struggle are GIVEN the basics that come from the WORK of those who choose to take those chances and succeed.
 
Send me your $1,000 seed money and god will repay you tenfold.
Was watching that on TV this morning early..
 
Because they never have rational, reasonable or honest answers or opposition to the truth of the libertarian argument, because the libertarian message is fundamentally the founding principles it’s classical liberalism and classical conservatism. Libertarians can back their positions and beliefs with the Constitution, Democrats & Republicans have to resort to lies, phony rhetoric and absurdities.

Oh, brother, can we get a bigger brush in here?
 
I'm not the one who wants someone who's stuggled to reach that $300,000 or $500,000 or $1,000,000 level, to keep struggling for someone else's benefit.
The idea of "stuggling" is to finally reach a stage, where you no longer have to struggle.

You want a world of grasshoppers living off the work of the ant.


So that would be a resounding


"NO"


...you CAN'T provide even one example of anyone struggling while making $1,000,000.00.


...but then everyone already knew that!
 
Why?
Are you having trouble applying your makeup?


Nah!

Rana just thought with a bigger brush, it might be easier for you to whitewash over all the total horseshit you attempt to pass off as "fact" on these boards.

You know...like the bullshit you spewed about someone making $1,000,000.00 and yet STILL STRUGGLING to make ends meet?
 
Nah!

Rana just thought with a bigger brush, it might be easier for you to whitewash over all the total horseshit you attempt to pass off as "fact" on these boards.

You know...like the bullshit you spewed about someone making $1,000,000.00 and yet STILL STRUGGLING to make ends meet?

Typical.

It's what passes for "well thought out" in USF's world.

He can't win in the arena of ideas, so out comes the same tired vulgarities.

USF really does prove the observation that insults and vulgarity are the last refuge of the weak minded.

more zappa double standard two faced whining

LOL
 
So that would be a resounding


"NO"


...you CAN'T provide even one example of anyone struggling while making $1,000,000.00.


...but then everyone already knew that!
Struggling TO make it.
The comfort whilst making it was a comfort well earned.

What did the filthy welfare cunt do to achieve his life of ease and comfort?
 
Struggling TO make it.
The comfort whilst making it was a comfort well earned.

What did the filthy welfare cunt do to achieve his life of ease and comfort?

During a commercial about football, there was a comment made that I found fitting.
Paraphrasing:
Struggling does not build character.
It brings out the character that was already in you.
 
Odd how I never said that someone making $1,000,000 was still struggling.


of course you didn't...LOL!


I'm not the one who wants someone who's stuggled to reach that $300,000 or $500,000 or $1,000,000 level, to keep struggling for someone else's benefit.


So...let's recap.

You were asked to provide some examples of those making $1,000,000.00 who were struggling to get by and you couldn't do it.

Of COURSE it makes sense to join ButtHurtYurt in another personal attack...what better way to avoid admitting apple was right and you are full of it?
 
My view on it is this: Society moves as a pendulum, with periods of accelerate development and stagnation. Every time the former occurs, there is a force to counter it. And what we've entered within the past several decades is a boom in technology and steady cultural reform - the cultural aspect has been coming out of the woodwork since the days of the Beats. Revolutionaries used to be overthrowing towns, now they're staging attacks and protests through the net. Wars used to be fought in trenches, now they're fought by robots. Homosexuals used to be shunned, now they've become the new civil rights movement. We've seen women and African-Americans occupying the position of power the likes of which previously existed in a fantasy. We're now working with a socialist power to provide oil for the poor. And just as the czarists opposed the revolution in Russia, social conservatives are opposing the revolution in the states - though the current one may be a tad slower paced.

That was really verbose, but I'm sure you get the point.
I believe the Haves are slowly being relieved of their possessions to the point that at least 99% of America will be the Have Nots, and the rest will be the Haves. It will come down to who of the current Haves will be smart enough to cozy up with the powers that be. The question is, who will be the Haves, and who will be the Have Nots?
 
of course you didn't...LOL!





So...let's recap.

You were asked to provide some examples of those making $1,000,000.00 who were struggling to get by and you couldn't do it.

Of COURSE it makes sense to join ButtHurtYurt in another personal attack...what better way to avoid admitting apple was right and you are full of it?

more two faced whiny douchebaggery by the board whiner...whining about personal attacks while personally attacking me

what a sissy
 
Back
Top