the only anti-globalist

Put up some supporting evidence for your beliefs.

Choose one disagreement.

Go find proof that protectionism is socialism, or find proof that i hate jews.

Your wild irrational beleifs based in propaganda are not compelling.

It's just that I'm tired of talking to a wall.

Being honest, your wild irrational beleifs based in propaganda are not compelling enough to keep me going on with this.
 
It's just that I'm tired of talking to a wall.
No. You're just tired of looking foolish by being confronted with your wrongness on simple word definitions. Like protectionism is not socialism. You can't handle simple realities.

Being honest, your wild irrational beleifs based in propaganda are not compelling enough to keep me going on with this.

And plus you keep getting your ass handed to you.
 
A nationalist beliefs national policies should improve the lives of citizens of the nation. Is that so outrageous?

That's a socialist statement. National policies are scary. I want my federal government to get out of the business of making national policies that effect my life. For the bad most of the time.
 
That's a socialist statement. National policies are scary. I want my federal government to get out of the business of making national policies that effect my life. For the bad most of the time.

No it's not. Policies can be pro- private industry, and many are.

Again, basic meanings of words have eluded you.
 
No. You're just tired of looking foolish by being confronted with your wrongness on simple word definitions. Like protectionism is not socialism. You can't handle simple realities.



And plus you keep getting your ass handed to you.

You're a fart.:fart:

When protectionism restricts me from success, and proffits a few (unions, etc) at my expence, you have marxism.
 
You're a fart.:fart:

When protectionism restricts me from success, and proffits a few (unions, etc) at my expence, you have marxism.

So marxism is anything which you restricts you, personally?

Maybe you should rely on innovative ideas instead of slave labor? Did you think of that?
 
No it's not. Policies can be pro- private industry, and many are.

Again, basic meanings of words have eluded you.

What do you mean by, "basic meanings of words have eluded you"?

Where do you get that?

Policies make up big gov't Mr smarty pants, and you want big gov't to help you. I want gov't to get out of my way, and let me be free from the restricions big gov't brings.

I can feed myself without the help you beg for.

I have to take care of my child at this time. I'll be back later to keep handing your ass to you.
 
What do you mean by, "basic meanings of words have eluded you"?

Where do you get that?
From your confusion about protectionism being marxism.
Policies make up big gov't Mr smarty pants, and you want big gov't to help you. I want gov't to get out of my way, and let me be free from the restricions big gov't brings.
No. YOu want it to help you.
I can feed myself without the help you beg for.

I have to take care of my child at this time. I'll be back later to keep handing your ass to you.

Ummm, but you lost again.
 
No it's not. Policies can be pro- private industry, and many are.

Again, basic meanings of words have eluded you.

Policies that help me are the restraints from the U S Constitution placed on the federal gov't to defend me.

Policies that ignore my basic rights outlined in the U S Constitution, The Decleration of Independence, and stated very clearly in "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine are really what you are trying to defend. You're on a misson that conflicts with the words, and message these works ally themselves with.

I guess you've had your ass handed to you again AssMet!
 
Policies that help me are the restraints from the U S Constitution placed on the federal gov't to defend me.

And the pro american trade policies which it is a constitutional duty of the federal government to devise have also helped you.

Policies that ignore my basic rights outlined in the U S Constitution, The Decleration of Independence, and stated very clearly in "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine are really what you are trying to defend. You're on a misson that conflicts with the words, and message these works ally themselves with.

I guess you've had your ass handed to you again AssMet!

You have no constitutional right to overseas slave labor. That's not in the constitution. But the government is constitutionally in charge of foreign trade policy. And it should handle this duty in a pro-american way.

Your ideas are anti-american and fascist.
 
And the pro american trade policies which it is a constitutional duty of the federal government to devise have also helped you.



You have no constitutional right to overseas slave labor. That's not in the constitution. But the government is constitutionally in charge of foreign trade policy. And it should handle this duty in a pro-american way.

Your ideas are anti-american and fascist.

Opinions from people who don't vote should be put at the back of the bus.

FYI libertarians are known for their anti-fascist beliefs.
 
Opinions from people who don't vote should be put at the back of the bus.

Actually those who keep voting and enabling the internationalist fascist oligarchy with their support should be slapped around until the asshole is knocked out of them.
FYI libertarians are known for their anti-fascist beliefs.


Regardless of the self congratulatory brainwash libertarians have concerning themselves, they are actually completely fascistic, believing that all government should be a mere extension of internationalist fascist corporations.
 
Regardless of the self congratulatory brainwash libertarians have concerning themselves, they are actually completely fascistic, believing that all government should be a mere extension of internationalist fascist corporations.

I disagree.
 
Explain how their beliefs are not a wish list of multinational corporate preferences, if you can.

You've not offered any credible evidence of such a thing being the case.

Libertarians don't wish for government controled monopolies. They wish mostly to throw off the yoke restraining them from a more prosperous life.

Life is hard enough for most people. You're the one who supports what you accuse me of, and complain about.
 
You've not offered any credible evidence of such a thing being the case.
Examine their beliefs. They consider anything which potentially makes profits more difficult to be evil, regardless of whatever prosocial reason for which the contraint exists. They believe borders and immigration policies should all be destroyed if they harm profits in any way.
Libertarians don't wish for government controled monopolies. They wish mostly to throw off the yoke restraining them from a more prosperous life.

Life is hard enough for most people. You're the one who supports what you accuse me of, and complain about.

Libertarians continue with free market zealotry even in the context of government controlled private public partnerships and massive bailouts for banks and preferred corporations. Continuing that "free market" line of crap in the current context of rising fascism is tacit support.
 
Last edited:
Examine their beliefs. They consider anything which potentially makes profits more difficult to be evil, regardless of whatever prosocial reason for which the contraint exists. They believe borders and immigration policies should all be destroyed if they harm profits in any way.

The belief is that life is hard enough to sustain without a government authority legislating more of a burdon on people who have an unalianable right to sustain their life with as little restriction as possible. The unfair "free trade" crap that's going on right now has nothing to do with libertarians.

Your borders crap you incorrectly refer to is not true. You know better than that. You're just saying a bunch of untrue propaganda to educate others from the truth.
 
Back
Top