The ONLY Gun Control/Regulation Fix....and yes, something has to be done

Anti-Party said:
Lockout devices have absolutely nothing to do with this post and you are clearly using them to dis-rail the current argument. Basic.
Click to expand...

But it does.
It goes back to your comment of "It doesn't stop a person from being a criminal, it's stops a criminal from getting a gun fast which has been the issue in tons of shootings......basics."; because the ignition lockout devices would make it harder for someone drinking to drive and thereby making society safer.

And since more people are killed by drunk drivers, isn't public safety the underlying argument?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But it does.
It goes back to your comment of "It doesn't stop a person from being a criminal, it's stops a criminal from getting a gun fast which has been the issue in tons of shootings......basics."; because the ignition lockout devices would make it harder for someone drinking to drive and thereby making society safer.

And since more people are killed by drunk drivers, isn't public safety the underlying argument?
Click to expand...

Oh, I understand your ignorant perspective now.

A gun was built to kill things. A car was built to transport. Only an idiot would confuse the two.

People can kill with anything. It's "Risk vs. Necessity" always when I make decisions.
 
Anti-Party said:
I don't want to taunt you and make you look stupid but you do realize that the "Union" is a union of citizens who band together to speak for a large majority and they decided that the few, the ones who were swimming in profits, shouldn't own slaves. This is the basic foundation of politics and America to the educated.
Click to expand...

So now only those "swimming in profits" were the only ones who owned slaves?
Is that what you're suggesting?

I see by your comments; that you now find it necessary to include denigrating comments, as a way to attempt to make your presentation appear truthful.
 
Anti-Party said:
Oh, I understand your ignorant perspective now.

A gun was built to kill things. A car was built to transport. Only an idiot would confuse the two.
Click to expand...

So were spears, swords, clubs, etc.
Are you suggesting back ground checks for them also?
There's also no need for cars to be built to go so fast and as we know, speed kills.

Nice to see that all you left, to support your assertions, is your ability to continue to attempt to denigrate.
Speaks more about you, then it does me. :)
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
And the "WELCOME TO AMERICAN", includes the 2A. :)
Click to expand...

I'm fully aware of the 2A and support it's basics. But I'm not ignorant of weapons technology. I'm also not ignorant to America's people.

My ONLY fear is that the ignorant fight long enough, America will end up like Australia even though soft measures were introduced long ago.

I have guns, I shoot them, I like them. But I hate ignorant Right Wingers who listen to Fox News and the Corporate driven NRA.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So now only those "swimming in profits" were the only ones who owned slaves?
Is that what you're suggesting?

I see by your comments; that you now find it necessary to include denigrating comments, as a way to attempt to make your presentation appear truthful.
Click to expand...

And you are pinned in a corner on this comment.

Swimming in profits depends on your perspective. Maybe you should think about the slave and wonder what profits that slave got..........ignorance.
 
Anti-Party said:
I'm fully aware of the 2A and support it's basics. But I'm not ignorant of weapons technology. I'm also not ignorant to America's people.

My ONLY fear is that the ignorant fight long enough, America will end up like Australia even though soft measures were introduced long ago.

I have guns, I shoot them, I like them. But I hate ignorant Right Wingers who listen to Fox News and the Corporate driven NRA.
Click to expand...

Hate is such a strong behavior; but since it usually comes from realizing that your arguments hold no truth.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So were spears, swords, clubs, etc.
Are you suggesting back ground checks for them also?
There's also no need for cars to be built to go so fast and as we know, speed kills.

Nice to see that all you left, to support your assertions, is your ability to continue to attempt to denigrate.
Speaks more about you, then it does me. :)
Click to expand...

The ignorant don't notice the issue is "massacre potential" not 1 kill potential...and it goes on from there. Trying to say we should have background checks for spears if todays weapons need them is just an ignorance of perspective.
 
Anti-Party said:
And you are pinned in a corner on this comment.

Swimming in profits depends on your perspective. Maybe you should think about the slave and wonder what profits that slave got..........ignorance.
Click to expand...

But you suggested that slave owners were swimming in profits and appeared to be all inclusive.
Are you now wanting to amend your opinion; because it has no merit or truth.
 
Anti-Party said:
I'm fully aware of the 2A and support it's basics. But I'm not ignorant of weapons technology. I'm also not ignorant to America's people.

My ONLY fear is that the ignorant fight long enough, America will end up like Australia even though soft measures were introduced long ago.

I have guns, I shoot them, I like them. But I hate ignorant Right Wingers who listen to Fox News and the Corporate driven NRA.
Click to expand...

Yes, you're a fudd and think you know about guns because you have fudd guns. No one is impressed.
 
Kane said:
Yes, you're a fudd and think you know about guns because you have fudd guns. No one is impressed.
Click to expand...

I'm a Country boy but more directly a Nature boy that loves to shoot. I'm a good aim because I shoot by feel, not sight. I could more than likely outshoot you bowfishing, archery, rifle and muzzle. You might get me with a hand gun because I never had one.

But I love my Country and I will not let it get taken over by Fox News and their army of Libertarians that are confused on what Liberty actually is.
 
Anti-Party said:
Rifles were first SOLD 13 YEARS after the 2A. My point.
Click to expand...

Rifles have been in existence since the 1500s. The one I showed was invented in 1780. That is 11 years before 1791. Its been spelled out 3 times now. I think its safe to say you not only don't understand firearms but history or basic math either.
 
Anti-Party said:
I'm a Country boy but more directly a Nature boy that loves to shoot. I'm a good aim because I shoot by feel, not sight. I could more than likely outshoot you bowfishing, archery, rifle and muzzle. You might get me with a hand gun because I never had one.

But I love my Country and I will not let it get taken over by Fox News and their army of Libertarians that are confused on what Liberty actually is.
Click to expand...

Yeah I don't think so fudd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top