THE QUESTION OF WHETHER ANY GODS EXIST...

substantiate?

The standard is a bit vague. I submit I can "substantiate" a high probability that no god exist, one with the standard characteristics of omnipotence, omniscience
and empathy for humans based on the well worn arguments 1. there is no credible sensory based evidence at all 2. a good god would not likely allow so much suffering
3. a lonely god would not use the mechanism he ostensibly did employ to create his little human buddies i.e. evolution over eons and a universe so hugethat it is irrelevant to
the human experience, to arrive at us, only to blow us off and never
hang out with us. 4. Every clown who through history claimed to be the incarnation just coincidentally arrived in normal dude form, instead of say, a giant dragon or some
entity which could not be explained away as a psychotic crackpot megalomaniac. So, yes, I'd say this "substantiates" that god's existence is extremely remote.
 
Frank Apisa said:
27geah.jpg
Click to expand...

That's OK Francis, you go right on believing that.

Here’s how I view you.

giphy.gif


Now show everyone how your OCD makes you reply. :D
 
Micawber said:
substantiate?

The standard is a bit vague. I submit I can "substantiate" a high probability that no god exist, one with the standard characteristics of omnipotence, omniscience
and empathy for humans based on the well worn arguments 1. there is no credible sensory based evidence at all 2. a good god would not likely allow so much suffering
3. a lonely god would not use the mechanism he ostensibly did employ to create his little human buddies i.e. evolution over eons and a universe so hugethat it is irrelevant to
the human experience, to arrive at us, only to blow us off and never
hang out with us. 4. Every clown who through history claimed to be the incarnation just coincidentally arrived in normal dude form, instead of say, a giant dragon or some
entity which could not be explained away as a psychotic crackpot megalomaniac. So, yes, I'd say this "substantiates" that god's existence is extremely remote.
Click to expand...

Your presentation seems to have omitted Faith and Free Will. :D
 
Micawber said:
substantiate?

The standard is a bit vague. I submit I can "substantiate" a high probability that no god exist, one with the standard characteristics of omnipotence, omniscience
and empathy for humans based on the well worn arguments 1. there is no credible sensory based evidence at all 2. a good god would not likely allow so much suffering
3. a lonely god would not use the mechanism he ostensibly did employ to create his little human buddies i.e. evolution over eons and a universe so hugethat it is irrelevant to
the human experience, to arrive at us, only to blow us off and never
hang out with us. 4. Every clown who through history claimed to be the incarnation just coincidentally arrived in normal dude form, instead of say, a giant dragon or some
entity which could not be explained away as a psychotic crackpot megalomaniac. So, yes, I'd say this "substantiates" that god's existence is extremely remote.
Click to expand...

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent.
Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent.
Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?

Epicurus
 
domer76 said:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent.
Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent.
Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?

Epicurus
Click to expand...

Because you're just a big old scared crybaby. :D
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you have nothing to back up your presentation and just wanted to see it in print. :good4u:
Click to expand...

I do. I’m trying to give you the opportunity to actually think for a few moments. You could start by looking up “omniscient”. That is, if you claim that your god actually is. If not, no need to bother.
 
domer76 said:
I do. I’m trying to give you the opportunity to actually think for a few moments. You could start by looking up “omniscient”. That is, if you claim that your god actually is. If not, no need to bother.
Click to expand...

Without you presenting your supposed "information", your comments just turn out to be you verbally masterbating. :good4u:
 
domer76 said:
Not in the least. People scared shitless of the prospect of nothingness concoct the wishful myth of something beyond. I understand that. You might give that reality a try, as well.
Click to expand...

I've seen nothing that resembles what you refer to as "people scared shitless of the prospect of nothingness", so I'm not sure what you're drawing your conclusion from.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top