This!!! Is my point on Due Process.

T. A. Gardner said:
About 8 years (2011 to 2019) until he was ordered deported. Then, another 6 until he was actually deported.
Click to expand...
So he had 8 years to go through the legal process to become an American citizen. Yet he didn't.
The question remains, why did he not want to become an American citizen during those 8 years?
Maybe one of our leftist posters who support his return can answer that question? I'm doubting it.
 
christiefan915 said:
Here's how his "deals" failed his casinos.
Click to expand...
Every single casino in Atlantic City and also in Las Vegas was in bankruptcy.

Every...single...one.

christiefan915 said:
And this is with regular infusions of his father's millions when things got dire.

"Trump assembled his casino empire by borrowing money at such high interest rates
Click to expand...
Nope. He didn't build a 'casino empire', and didn't borrow money to do it.
christiefan915 said:
— after telling regulators he would not — that the businesses had almost no chance to succeed.
Click to expand...
It did until casinos started going bankrupt.
christiefan915 said:
His casino companies made four trips to bankruptcy court,
Click to expand...
One.
christiefan915 said:
each time persuading bondholders to accept less money rather than be wiped out. But the companies repeatedly added more expensive debt and returned to the court for protection from lenders.
Click to expand...
One. The casino was sold to another buyer.
christiefan915 said:
After narrowly escaping financial ruin in the early 1990s by delaying payments on his debts,
Click to expand...
He didn't.
christiefan915 said:
Trump avoided a second potential crisis by taking his casinos public and shifting the risk to stockholders.
Click to expand...
It was always an investment made with others, moron.
christiefan915 said:
And he never was able to draw in enough gamblers to support all of the borrowing.
Click to expand...
None of them did. Like I said...every single casino was in bankruptcy, not just Trump's investments.
christiefan915 said:
During a decade when other casinos here thrived, Trump's lagged, posting huge losses year after year. Stock and bondholders lost more than $1.5 billion.
Click to expand...
Argument from randU fallacy. Stop making up numbers.
christiefan915 said:
All the while, Trump received copious amounts for himself, with the help of a compliant board. In one instance, the Times found, Trump pulled more than $1 million from his failing public company, describing the transaction in securities filings in ways that may have been illegal, according to legal experts.
Click to expand...
More fiction.
christiefan915 said:
Trump now says he left Atlantic City at the perfect time.
Click to expand...
Not really. He was late. Atlantic city was already losing casinos to bankruptcy.
christiefan915 said:
The record, however, shows that he struggled to hang on to his casinos years after the city had peaked, and failed only because his investors no longer wanted him in a management role."
Click to expand...
Bankruptcy of all the casinos in Atlantic City is not a 'peak'.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
When a US judge has ruled they are not to be sent back to that country
Click to expand...
No judge has authority over Trump's authority of the executive branch, Poorboy.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
and the US admits that sending them to the country was a mistake, the act of sending them is an act of the US and an act that violates US law.
Click to expand...
No law was violated by Trump, Poorboy. The illegal alien that was deported broke the law.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Not necessarily. The judge has to have jurisdiction over the case and has to be following the law...
Click to expand...
Are we talking about the case that was appealed to the USSC and the upper court ruled 9-0 that the court had jurisdiction and could require the government to facilitate the return?

Clearly the judge has jurisdiction and clearly the judge is following the law. The problem isn't the judge following the law. The problem is the Trump administration refusing to follow a court's orders which they are required to do by law.
 
Tobytone said:
You do know that was already established by two courts, don't you? Maybe you're talking about someone else. Who? Which one has never seen a courtroom before as a known illegal?
Click to expand...
You do know that it wasn't established in any court. Oh.. wait.. you don't know because you are relying on the propaganda spewed out by the Trump administration instead of the actual court rulings.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You do know that it wasn't established in any court. Oh.. wait.. you don't know because you are relying on the propaganda spewed out by the Trump administration instead of the actual court rulings.
Click to expand...
Ok Dicky, I'll just answer my own question and let you know who I'm referring to:

Meet Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the left’s latest poster boy for “save the poor criminal” bingo. Back in 2019, Immigration Judge Olivia Cassin in Baltimore slapped him with a no-bond ruling, pointing to a pesky little detail: a confidential informant tying him to MS-13. Then, Judge Denise Slavin swooped in later that year, tossing him a “withholding of removal” lifeline to dodge deportation to El Salvador, citing risks of gang violence. How touching.

Call me old-fashioned, but those court dates scream “not an American” and “straight outta El Salvador” louder than a mariachi band. The DOJ’s evidence pile, plus Slavin’s nod to rival gang threats, paints a neon sign: MS-13 thug. Why else would a “rival gang” want him gone? It’s not like they’re fighting over who gets the last pupusa. Common sense isn’t exactly the left’s strong suit, though, is it? They’re too busy knitting him a halo to notice he’s a menace. This guy’s a walking crime wave we’re better off without, and the second he was yeeted back to El Salvador, America dodged a bullet. Keep cheering for your “victim,” libtards, it’s adorable how you fall for every sob story.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Are we talking about the case that was appealed to the USSC and the upper court ruled 9-0 that the court had jurisdiction and could require the government to facilitate the return?

Clearly the judge has jurisdiction and clearly the judge is following the law. The problem isn't the judge following the law. The problem is the Trump administration refusing to follow a court's orders which they are required to do by law.
Click to expand...
I want to know who will be held in contempt of court?
 
ULTRA MAGA said:
Sending an illegal alien home isn't depriving them of any of those things. It's just sending them back where they snuck in from.
Click to expand...
The courts have to judge whether the person is illegal . That is due process. You are so certain they are illegals, that you should welcome them getting a hearing. Then you could say "I told you so". We know that Garcia was a mistake. The govt should be happy to rectify a mistake that put an innocent person in an El Salvadorian jail to be tortured.
You make unsubstantiated claims. You should he happy for them to get due process.
Your reluctance for them to get justice shows you have doubts that they are all guilty of crimes.
Worse, it shows you do not care if innocent people are jailed.
 
Nordberg said:
The courts have to judge whether the person is illegal . That is due process. You are so certain they are illegals, that you should welcome them getting a hearing. Then you could say "I told you so". We know that Garcia was a mistake. The govt should be happy to rectify a mistake that put an innocent person in an El Salvadorian jail to be tortured.
You make unsubstantiated claims. You should he happy for them to get due process.
Your reluctance for them to get justice shows you have doubts that they are all guilty of crimes.
Worse, it shows you do not care if innocent people are jailed.
Click to expand...
Ponder this…he claimed he did not belong to a gang yet he fought being deported to his country of origin because he feared his gang would retaliate for lying about not belonging to the gang.

You can’t make this stuff up.
 
Earl said:
What are you in touch with?

The fact that you are angry and delusional.
Click to expand...
Happy and well informed about reality. You however are still angry my wife and I ate average eggs. You resorted to name calling... clear and obviously a sign of anger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top