Three ways for the Jury to convict Trump

Poor Richard Saunders said:
You clearly didn't read what I linked to. It clearly states that Cohen didn't act alone but coordinated with persons associated with the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

Apparently you are not paying attention to the evidentiary portion of the trial where it was proven that Cohen coordinated nothing and lied about his phone call to Trump, which was actually to his bodyguard complaining about a 14 year old prankster.

In addition, you missed the testimony of his former attorney who stated under oath that Cohen admitted to him that he had nothing on Trump.

Apparently, you also missed the statement by Stormy clearly stating that they never had sex.

One has to wonder what else you seem to purposefully missed while desperately flailing and making yourself look like a dumb hack.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
The following has all been found to be true by a court of law when Cohen plead guilty.

"COHEN caused and made the payments described herein in order to influence the 2016 presidential election. In so doing, he coordinated with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. As a result of the payments solicited and made by COHEN, neither Woman-1 nor Woman-2 spoke to the press prior to the election.


In January 2017, COHEN in seeking reimbursement for election-related expenses, presented executives of the Company with a copy of a bank statement from the Essential Consultants bank account, which reflected the $130,000 payment COHEN had made to the bank account of Attorney-1 in order to keep Woman-2 silent in advance of the election, plus a $35 wire fee, adding, in handwriting, an additional “$50,000.” The $50,000 represented a claimed payment for “tech services,” which in fact related to work COHEN had solicited from a technology company during and in connection with the campaign. COHEN added these amounts to a sum of $180,035. After receiving this document, executives of the Company “grossed up” for tax purposes COHEN’s requested reimbursement of $180,000 to $360,000, and then added a bonus of $60,000 so that COHEN would be paid $420,000 in total. Executives of the Company also determined that the $420,000 would be paid to COHEN in monthly amounts of $35,000 over the course of 12 months, and that COHEN should send invoices for these payments.


On February 14, 2017, COHEN sent an executive of the Company (“Executive-1”) the first of his monthly invoices, requesting “[p]ursuant to [a] retainer agreement, . . . payment for services rendered for the months of January and February, 2017.” The invoice listed $35,000 for each of those two months. Executive-1 forwarded the invoice to another executive of the Company (“Executive-2”) the same day by email, and it was approved. Executive-1 forwarded that email to another employee at the Company, stating: “Please pay from the Trust. Post to legal expenses. Put ‘retainer for the months of January and February 2017’ in the description.”


Throughout 2017, COHEN sent to one or more representatives of the Company monthly invoices, which stated, “Pursuant to the retainer agreement, kindly remit payment for services rendered for” the relevant month in 2017, and sought $35,000 per month. The Company accounted for these payments as legal expenses. In truth and in fact, there was no such retainer agreement, and the monthly invoices COHEN submitted were not in connection with any legal services he had provided in 2017.

During 2017, pursuant to the invoices described above, COHEN received monthly $35,000 reimbursement checks, totaling $420,000. "
Click to expand...

None of this has been proven or co-oberated by the Prosecution. None of this is a violation of our federal campaign election laws as indicated by the FEC.

What has been proven so far, is that Cohen was acting on his own in a vain attempt to ingratiate himself to the Trump campaign in the hopes of getting a plush job in the Trump administration.

In addition, what has been proven is that Cohen funded the NDA from funds he received by taking out a second on his personal residence and keeping it a secret. Now anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have to wonder, if this is being coordinated in some vast conspiracy, why Cohen would need to lie, cheat the Trump organization out of $60 grand instead of just sending Cohen the funds.

But you, being an unintelligent and dishonest hack, apparently lack the IQ to be even the slightest bit curious. Instead, you parrot laughably stupid theories you've been gullibly fed by the DNC and MSNBC and substitute that for your thinking.
 
Jarod said:
We will see if the jury agrees, because your biased opinion is not what matters.
Click to expand...

If the jury is dumb enough to allow their hatred to interfere with justice, this shameless banana republic cased will be easily overturned on appeal.

You'll probably come back pounding your tiny little fists on the table demanding you were right.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Merchan doesn't allege any crime. He is letting the prosecution show that 3 possible crimes occurred that turned the falsification of the documents into a felony. As a matter of law, there is a case here and if you bothered to read the court rulings you would realize there is a case. Trump certainly thinks there is a case because he chickened out on testifying and lied about why he wasn't testifying. Merchan has already ruled on the motion for a mistrial. He didn't declare one.

Aren't you cute with your antisemitism tropes?

Maybe someday you will realize you have no brain but I doubt it since you are not smart enough to realize how dumb you are.
Click to expand...

You're too stupid to comprehend how outrageous Merchan's behavior has been and is with this nonsense about three possible crimes.

The 6th amendment does not state you can be charged with "possible" crimes dumbass. It clearly states that you must be made aware of the actual crime you are being forced into court over.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
ROFL

Merchan is the lead prosecutor.




No, Neither Bragg nor Merchan ever did so - and they have rested their case. They aren't concerned, since this isn't a court of law - just a lynching.



As a matter of law - there is no case. An alleged bookkeeping error that is 3 years past the statute of limitations - which Merchan's key perjurer admitted under oath to ordering himself without direction from the last legitimate president. An act that is at best a misdemeanor that the scumbag Bragg "stacked" and charged repeatedly. Then the two Soros goons, Merchan and Bragg try and claim that a bookkeeping error is a felony.

No, there is no case as a matter of law, but this isn't a court of law - just a lynching.



LOL

Are you claiming that Merchan is JEWISH? Or maybe Bragg? I suppose it's no less rational or factual than the rest of the shit you write..

There are a lot of Antisemites on this board - most of them Marxists like you.



What will you do if there is a hung jury or if Merchan declares a mistrial? Will the realization the Quid Pro will lose start to sink in? That even with the famous democrat election fraud machine, you can't overcome the American people?
Click to expand...
OMFG. You are completely out of touch with reality. Merchan is the judge.

Loading…

pdfs.nycourts.gov
B E F O R E:
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
A P P E A R A N C E S:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY: JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO, ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys

BLANCHE LAW
BY: TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA M. STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant

Claiming people have been paid by Soros is a an antisemetic trope. Why are you antisemetic?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
OMFG. You are completely out of touch with reality. Merchan is the judge.

Loading…

pdfs.nycourts.gov
B E F O R E:
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
Click to expand...
There is nothing honorable about Merchan - nothing even remotely honorable.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Claiming people have been paid by Soros is a an antisemetic trope. Why are you antisemetic?
Click to expand...

ROFL

Then YOU are an Antisemite for attacking Alan Dershowitz.

Such a cowardly attempt. Pathetic.
 
Truth Detector said:
If the jury is dumb enough to allow their hatred to interfere with justice, this shameless banana republic cased will be easily overturned on appeal.

You'll probably come back pounding your tiny little fists on the table demanding you were right.
Click to expand...

Yes, but the PURPOSE of this lynching is to let Biden call Trump a "convicted felon." That is the ENTIRE purpose. Biden, Bragg, and Merchan have spent millions of taxpayer dollars to corrupt the 2024 election.
 
gfm7175 said:
The three items I listed are the three ways that the jury would convict Trump. Otherwise, any non-tainted non-threatened jury would never convict Trump because there's no crime present to convict him OF.
Click to expand...

Have we ever had a court state to a jury they have three ways they can find someone guilty without evidence supporting a crime?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
OMFG. You are completely out of touch with reality. Merchan is the judge.

Loading…

pdfs.nycourts.gov
B E F O R E:
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
A P P E A R A N C E S:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY: JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO, ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys

BLANCHE LAW
BY: TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA M. STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant

Claiming people have been paid by Soros is a an antisemetic trope. Why are you antisemetic?
Click to expand...

A judge whose actions basically placed him behiond the prosecutions table.

I know that subtle analogies are difficult for the IQ impaired to comprehend.
 
Truth Detector said:
A summary declaration ending this trial before he gets embarrassed on appeal is his only saving grace.
Click to expand...

AND Merchan is touchy about his financial ties to the case. He goes well beyond unethical and into criminal with the use of this lynching to fund his daughter's business venture.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
AND Merchan is touchy about his financial ties to the case. He goes well beyond unethical and into criminal with the use of this lynching to fund his daughter's business venture.
Click to expand...

Not only that, but extremely thin skinned about anyone looking at him funny. Could it be that he is aware of what a joke he is making this case appear?
 
Truth Detector said:
Apparently you are not paying attention to the evidentiary portion of the trial where it was proven that Cohen coordinated nothing and lied about his phone call to Trump, which was actually to his bodyguard complaining about a 14 year old prankster.

In addition, you missed the testimony of his former attorney who stated under oath that Cohen admitted to him that he had nothing on Trump.

Apparently, you also missed the statement by Stormy clearly stating that they never had sex.

One has to wonder what else you seem to purposefully missed while desperately flailing and making yourself look like a dumb hack.



None of this has been proven or co-oberated by the Prosecution. None of this is a violation of our federal campaign election laws as indicated by the FEC.

What has been proven so far, is that Cohen was acting on his own in a vain attempt to ingratiate himself to the Trump campaign in the hopes of getting a plush job in the Trump administration.

In addition, what has been proven is that Cohen funded the NDA from funds he received by taking out a second on his personal residence and keeping it a secret. Now anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have to wonder, if this is being coordinated in some vast conspiracy, why Cohen would need to lie, cheat the Trump organization out of $60 grand instead of just sending Cohen the funds.

But you, being an unintelligent and dishonest hack, apparently lack the IQ to be even the slightest bit curious. Instead, you parrot laughably stupid theories you've been gullibly fed by the DNC and MSNBC and substitute that for your thinking.
Click to expand...
Apparently you have decided that the only evidence that exists is what you want to exist. Cohen called the bodyguard and then talked to Trump on the bodyguard's phone. Pictures from that day show Trump with his bodyguard.
The testimony by Cohen's former attorney was a mess with the judge having to clear the courtroom and reprimand the witness. His testimony is as problematic as Cohen's.
Apparently you missed the explanation from Stormy as to why she felt she had to deny the sex out of fear for her daughter's safety.
It's pretty clear what you have missed.

Claiming something isn't against the law that someone went to jail for isn't much of an argument and I doubt the jury would consider that proof that the crime doesn't exist.
Of course Cohen funded the NDA. You don't seem to realize that his fronting the money is evidence of trying to hide it from being listed as a campaign expense at the time.
I am not the one parroting stupid theories. I am talking about the evidence as a whole. Cohen has lied and committed perjury. That doesn't make his testimony false. It only makes it suspect and what other corroborating evidence exists to support it.

Cohen didn't cheat the company out of $60 grand. He cheated the vendor out of their full payment.

They jury will have heard all the evidence not just the parts you want to highlight. They will make their decision based on all the evidence. You will whine about how they ignored the evidence when it is you that is ignoring the mountain of evidence to concentrate on your molehill.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top