‘Tim Walz Reenlisted After 9/11’ Is The Latest Lie About His Military Record

volsrock1 said:
Reenlisting after 9/11

My initial reaction to the narrative that Walz reenlisted after 9/11 out of a sense of patriotism was confusion, as his date of enlistment was April 1981 and one would expect, absent unusual circumstances involving extensions or breaks in service, his 20-year retirement date would have been April 2001 and any reenlistment or extension would’ve had to have been executed in April, months prior to Sept. 11, 2001.

So I looked into it. On Nov. 2, 2009, Walz sat down with a historian from the Library of Congress Veterans History Project to memorialize his service as a military veteran. During the course of Walz’s description of his service to his country, he related the following regarding his decision to reenlist after the 9/11 attacks:

That was a lie.

But there’s more. Three years earlier, in response to a letter to the editor of the Winona Daily News written by Tom Hagen, an Iraqi war combat veteran and former colleague of Walz in the 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery of the Minnesota Army National Guard, in which Hagen questioned Walz’s decision to retire within two months of receiving a warning order for his battalion to deploy to Iraq, Walz wrote the following:

That, too, was a lie. Both of those quotes have been exclusively linked in news media stories as citations to support reporting that Walz “reenlisted after 9/11 when he could have retired, having reached 20 years of service in 2001.” If you Google “Tim Walz reenlisted after 9/11,” you’ll find pages upon pages of publications parroting the story Walz has told since his retirement in 2005. It’s not true.


thefederalist.com

'Tim Walz Reenlisted After 9/11' Is The Latest Lie About His Record

Just like claims that he served in war, or retired as a command sergeant major, the story Walz tells about reenlisting is not true.
thefederalist.com thefederalist.com
Click to expand...
Even in the nasty paid letter swiftboaters Behrends and Herr wrote to the newspaper, they listed his date of enlistment as 09/18/2001.

www.wctrib.com

Paid letter: The Truth About Tim Walz

Tim Walz has embellished and selectively omitted facts and circumstances of his military career for years.
www.wctrib.com www.wctrib.com
 
volsrock1 said:

Reenlisting after 9/11​



My initial reaction to the narrative that Walz reenlisted after 9/11 out of a sense of patriotism was confusion, as his date of enlistment was April 1981 and one would expect, absent unusual circumstances involving extensions or breaks in service, his 20-year retirement date would have been April 2001 and any reenlistment or extension would’ve had to have been executed in April, months prior to Sept. 11, 2001.



So I looked into it. On Nov. 2, 2009, Walz sat down with a historian from the Library of Congress Veterans History Project to memorialize his service as a military veteran. During the course of Walz’s description of his service to his country, he related the following regarding his decision to reenlist after the 9/11 attacks:






That was a lie.



But there’s more. Three years earlier, in response to a letter to the editor of the Winona Daily News written by Tom Hagen, an Iraqi war combat veteran and former colleague of Walz in the 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery of the Minnesota Army National Guard, in which Hagen questioned Walz’s decision to retire within two months of receiving a warning order for his battalion to deploy to Iraq, Walz wrote the following:







That, too, was a lie. Both of those quotes have been exclusively linked in news media stories as citations to support reporting that Walz “reenlisted after 9/11 when he could have retired, having reached 20 years of service in 2001.” If you Google “Tim Walz reenlisted after 9/11,” you’ll find pages upon pages of publications parroting the story Walz has told since his retirement in 2005. It’s not true.


thefederalist.com

'Tim Walz Reenlisted After 9/11' Is The Latest Lie About His Record

Just like claims that he served in war, or retired as a command sergeant major, the story Walz tells about reenlisting is not true.
thefederalist.com thefederalist.com
Click to expand...
Out of 100,000 sperm cells- you had to be the one that got there first!.

That's despicable!
 
ExpressLane said:
If Walz just had not lied and inflated his service for political gain things would be fine. He did not have to retire to run for Congress other members of Congress have served in the NG and Congress. Tulsi Gabbard did in fact. She is a Lieutenant Colonel. Walz left TWO YEARS before his commitment was finished. Walz never finished the training to be a Command Sargent Major to that title was stripped from him BEFORE he retired.
Click to expand...
One hundred per cent accurate.

Walz lied about his rank and service and carrying a weapon in war. He lied about his drunk driving arrest. He did it to further his military career.

Walz is a liar and a Valor Thief.
 
Earl said:
One hundred per cent accurate.

Walz lied about his rank and service and carrying a weapon in war. He lied about his drunk driving arrest. He did it to further his military career.

Walz is a liar and a Valor Thief.
Click to expand...
While you stomp on that puddle Republicans are sinking in a swamp.
 
ExpressLane said:
If Walz just had not lied and inflated his service for political gain things would be fine. He did not have to retire to run for Congress other members of Congress have served in the NG and Congress. Tulsi Gabbard did in fact. She is a Lieutenant Colonel. Walz left TWO YEARS before his commitment was finished. Walz never finished the training to be a Command Sargent Major to that title was stripped from him BEFORE he retired.
Click to expand...
You cock sucking loser. 24 years of military service isn't enough for you? How many did you serve? How about Fat Fuck Trump?
 
volsrock1 said:

Reenlisting after 9/11​



My initial reaction to the narrative that Walz reenlisted after 9/11 out of a sense of patriotism was confusion, as his date of enlistment was April 1981 and one would expect, absent unusual circumstances involving extensions or breaks in service, his 20-year retirement date would have been April 2001 and any reenlistment or extension would’ve had to have been executed in April, months prior to Sept. 11, 2001.



So I looked into it. On Nov. 2, 2009, Walz sat down with a historian from the Library of Congress Veterans History Project to memorialize his service as a military veteran. During the course of Walz’s description of his service to his country, he related the following regarding his decision to reenlist after the 9/11 attacks:






That was a lie.



But there’s more. Three years earlier, in response to a letter to the editor of the Winona Daily News written by Tom Hagen, an Iraqi war combat veteran and former colleague of Walz in the 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery of the Minnesota Army National Guard, in which Hagen questioned Walz’s decision to retire within two months of receiving a warning order for his battalion to deploy to Iraq, Walz wrote the following:







That, too, was a lie. Both of those quotes have been exclusively linked in news media stories as citations to support reporting that Walz “reenlisted after 9/11 when he could have retired, having reached 20 years of service in 2001.” If you Google “Tim Walz reenlisted after 9/11,” you’ll find pages upon pages of publications parroting the story Walz has told since his retirement in 2005. It’s not true.


thefederalist.com

'Tim Walz Reenlisted After 9/11' Is The Latest Lie About His Record

Just like claims that he served in war, or retired as a command sergeant major, the story Walz tells about reenlisting is not true.
thefederalist.com thefederalist.com
Click to expand...
I love it when people who never served bitch about those who did. Trump is a cowardly draft-dodging, adulterous, oath-breaking traitor. Anyone who follows him is a fucking moron and traitor to the Constitution.
 
Earl said:
One hundred per cent accurate.

Walz lied about his rank and service and carrying a weapon in war. He lied about his drunk driving arrest. He did it to further his military career.

Walz is a liar and a Valor Thief.
Click to expand...
Wow, it really is hurting you to realize your Fuhrer is going to get his ass kicked by a woman in November.

Thank you for showing us that you are hurting so much.

We are enjoying the display.
 
So, the far left Democratic Socialist loons are predicting a blue wave.

Walz is a liar and a Valor Thief.

Heels Up Harris has already shown what she can do to America. Out of control borders, crime, inflation, and wars.

Communistic price controls…no thanks.

Even the WAPO excoriated her for that.
 
Last edited:
As I've stated several times in the past, MAGAts ain't too bright. This includes their ex-military traitors. Fortunately, most are not a threat.

9122at.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top