You are joking. This is Laffler curve shit. I know no economists who are not employed by Fox Gnus, who say that. Bush did it a few years ago. How did that work out. This is not speculation. There is plenty of data on the impact of tax cuts. And Trumps claim of more jobs and more revenue are not what they concluded.
Can you make a post without calling a person a name? It is so childish and immature.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/22/...RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article
You don't have the slightest clue of what you are emoting about shit-for-brains. Laffer curve??? LMAO!
Because you're a low information dullard, I will tell you what happened after the Bush Tax cuts:
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) passed into law on June 7, 2001
Revenue in 2002 was 1,853 Trillion
By 2004 revenue had increased to 1,880 Trillion.
The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 passed into law on May 28, 2003
Revenue in 2003 was 1,782.3 Trillion
by 2005 it had grown to 2,153.6 Trillion.
Within three years revenues had grown to 2,568 Trillion.
The FACTS suggest that tax cuts did not decrease revenue therefore they had a positive effect on revenue. The deficits were caused by increased spending to pay for 9-11 and two wars that were voted FOR by a bi-partisan congress.
TAX CUTS DO NOT CAUSE DEFICITS OR REDUCED REVENUE; THAT'S A UNDISPUTED HISTORIC FACT. It is the increase in spending you moron!
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/federal-receipt-and-outlay-summary