Radio is for old people is what my niece tells me!So how come there aren't any mainstream left-wing stations?
Radio is for old people is what my niece tells me!So how come there aren't any mainstream left-wing stations?
No, they don't. MSM CNN MSNBC and the networks are doing just fine: four times the amount of FOX viewing.
https://deadline.com/2019/12/cable-ratings-2019-list-fox-news-total-viewers-espn-18-49-demo-1202817561/Fox News was the top-rated basic cable network among total viewers for a fourth year in a row, with an average of 2.57 million in L+7. In second place was a news network on the other side of the deepening partisan fault line, MSNBC, with 1.80 million, according to Nielsen. CNN notched an average of 1 million.
There are no liberal cable news networks.
Boris Johnson is Churchill by comparison to TRUMP.
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
Really pathetic how @FoxNews is trying to be so politically correct by loading the airwaves with Democrats like Chris Van Hollen, the no name Senator from Maryland. He has been on forever playing up the Impeachment Hoax. Dems wouldn’t even give Fox their low ratings debates....
15.8K
Twitter Ads info and privacy
You know that doesn't make any sense, right? Like if that was the case, there'd be little to no Leftists.
The truth is the media is owned and funded by big businesses, so of course they're not going to promote left-wing ideas.
Thank You for admitting liberalism is a losing idea. Big business is there to make a profit and will not back liberal media as no one is interested in hearing the moronic ideas the left comes up with.
Not quite. Liberalism is good for the working-class, but it costs the 1% money. The super rich want to keep the public ignorant of certain ideas that they see as a threat to their hold over wealth and power.
Now where have I heard that before?To each according to his needs. From each according to his ability.
So you say liberalism is
Now where have I heard that before?
TRUMP MELTDOWN: "What happened to FOX? Wallace should be on FAKE NEWS. End of FOX"
To the right, real news only has one side all day long. If it is not backing Trump, no matter what he does, it should be gone. Wallace has actually asked the Repubs some real questions to get the facts out. That is so left. The right does not do that and that is what the rights here are saying. That is not permitted.
Does FOX have factcheckers? Did they ever even bother?
don't be upset if we just let you play in your own thread,
you are one goofy little man
I didn't say that. I said liberal policies are good for the working-class.
Karl Marx was all for the working class also, so it sounds like the two ideas are similar.
Are you seriously using the Hitler Ate Sugar argument?
No I am simply saying liberalism wants to punish the successful and reward the nonsuccessful in society the same as Karl Marx envisioned.
There are differences but the basic idea is the same.
Karl Marx was all for the working class also, so it sounds like the two ideas are similar.
That's Hitler Ate Sugar. It's saying that this thing is bad because a bad person did it. You might as well say that having a beard and speaking German are bad because Marx had a beard and spoke German.
And no, Liberalism isn't about punishing the successful, it's about realizing that we as a society need to work together. A person who doesn't drive pays taxes to have roads and bridges. Is that person being punished because they're being forced to pay for a service they don't use? Of course not. And while this person doesn't use the roads and bridges, they're still benefiting from the products of the people who do use these services.
That's Hitler Ate Sugar. It's saying that this thing is bad because a bad person did it. You might as well say that having a beard and speaking German are bad because Marx had a beard and spoke German.
Liberalism isn't about punishing the successful,
it's about realizing that we as a society need to work together
A person who doesn't drive pays taxes to have roads and bridges. Is that person being punished because they're being forced to pay for a service they don't use? Of course not. And while this person doesn't use the roads and bridges, they're still benefiting from the products of the people who do use these services.