Trump Sexual Assault Allegations!

Grind is somewhat correct in that both sides have beliefs of convenience on this one.

However, I find the hypocrisy of the right to be much more pronounced - simply because I lived through the late '90's and the triggering-of-incomprehensible-magnitude among them during the Lewinsky/Jones/I never had sex w/ that woman thing.

It's another of those typical "what? huh? did we...huh?" bouts of collective amnesia.
 
Is this a Current Event? I don't see allegations about Trump's supposed sexual activities in the headlines. Do you?

I think this is "old news", as in "never proven and regurgitated today as a sad selection from the real current events".

It's not like Weinstein, whose name is on every newscasters lips and whose face is in every newspaper and on every news website RIGHT FUCKING NOW, is it?

:rofl2:

it's a discussion in the news

let me handle what isn't and is on topic bro
 
Is this a Current Event? I don't see allegations about Trump's supposed sexual activities in the headlines. Do you?

I think this is "old news", as in "never proven and regurgitated today as a sad selection from the real current events".

It's not like Weinstein, whose name is on every newscasters lips and whose face is in every newspaper and on every news website RIGHT FUCKING NOW, is it?

:rofl2:

Your desperate attempts to avoid discussing your double standard is quite delicious.

Maybe next time you will tell your mommy on me?
 
Recalcitrant Republicans Refuse to Respond

When Harvey Weinstein was accused of sexual assault, everyone took the word of his female accusers.

When Donald Trump was accused of the SAME CRIME, he and his followers simply laughed it off and claimed it was "fake news".

Which begs the question: why the double standard?

No double standard.
 
women are physically weak by orders of magnitude. if us men wanted to, your entire gender would all be slaves into perpetuity. The only rights and privileges you have are the ones that us men graciously allowed you to possess.

I am trying to figure out if Zax is kidding here or not.
 
Your desperate attempts to avoid discussing your double standard is quite delicious. Maybe next time you will tell your mommy on me?

I would have told your mommy if I wanted to tell a mommy anything. :rofl2:

Start some more threads about the years-old allegations against Trump while I concentrate on current events, like your fellow DEMOCRAT Weinstein and his close friends Hillary and the Obamas.
 
I would have told your mommy if I wanted to tell a mommy anything. :rofl2:

Start some more threads about the years-old allegations against Trump while I concentrate on current events, like your fellow DEMOCRAT Weinstein and his close friends Hillary and the Obamas.

Still can't tell anyone how the sexual assault charges against Trump are any different than the claims made about Weinstein, eh?

Just as I suspected.
 
Grind is somewhat correct in that both sides have beliefs of convenience on this one.

However, I find the hypocrisy of the right to be much more pronounced - simply because I lived through the late '90's and the triggering-of-incomprehensible-magnitude among them during the Lewinsky/Jones/I never had sex w/ that woman thing.

It's another of those typical "what? huh? did we...huh?" bouts of collective amnesia.

the only one proven was the consentual one



the republicans paid for all the others accusers legal fees dude.


who is paying for the trump ones?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations




Juanita Broaddrick[edit]
In a 1999 episode of Dateline NBC, former Bill Clinton volunteer Juanita Broaddrick alleged that, in the late 1970s, Clinton raped her in her hotel room. According to Broaddrick, she agreed to meet with Clinton for coffee in the lobby of her hotel, but Clinton asked if they could go to her room to avoid a crowd of reporters; she agreed. Once Clinton had isolated her in her hotel room, Broaddrick states that he raped her. Broaddrick stated Clinton injured her lip by biting it during the assault.[1][2] In 1999, Clinton denied Broaddrick's allegations through his lawyer.
Supporters of Clinton have questioned her account by noting that Broaddrick continued to support Clinton, and appear at public events on his behalf, weeks after the alleged rape, along with the fact that Broaddrick stated that she couldn't remember the exact date the alleged incident occurred.[3] In addition, Broaddrick had once signed a deposition, under oath, stating that no sexual contact had occurred with Bill Clinton; although she subsequently stated that she had made this claim because "I didn't want to be forced to testify about the most horrific event of my life."[4][5] In 1999, Slate magazine published an inconclusive piece on whether Broaddrick was telling the truth.[6] She was then subpoenaed but denied under oath that Clinton had raped her, in order, she later said[by whom?], to protect her privacy, her husband and her horse-farm business. During the Clinton impeachment proceedings, Broaddrick changed course and publicly alleged the President had raped her to ABC news. She stated that in 1978 that she revealed the alleged assault to five intimates, and that they advised her not to cause trouble for herself by going public.
Broaddrick's allegations resurfaced in the 2016 presidential campaign. In various media interviews, Broaddrick stated that Clinton raped her and that Hillary Clinton knew about it, and tried to threaten Broaddrick into remaining silent. She said that she started giving some interviews in 2015 because Hillary Clinton's statement that victims of sexual assault should be believed angered her.[7] In 2016, she spoke out, together with Clinton's two other accusers (Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey). They also criticized Hillary Clinton for enabling her husband's alleged abuse.
Paula Jones[edit]
According to Paula Jones' account, on May 8, 1991, she was escorted to Clinton's hotel room in Little Rock, Arkansas[8] where he propositioned and exposed himself to her. She claimed she kept quiet about the incident until 1994, when a David Brock story in the American Spectator magazine printed an account. In any case, in 1994, Jones filed a federal lawsuit against Clinton, alleging sexual harassment. In the discovery stage of the suit, Jones's lawyers had the opportunity to question Clinton under oath about his sexual history; in the course of this testimony, Clinton denied having had a sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky, a denial that (once his affair with Lewinsky was exposed) would lead to his impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice.[9]
Several witnesses disputed Jones's account, including her sister and brother-in-law. These witnesses contended that she had described her encounter with Clinton as "happy" and "gentle." In addition, Jones had claimed to friends that Clinton had a particular deformity on his penis, a claim that was revealed to be false by investigators.[10]
In April 1998, the case was dismissed by Republican Judge Susan Webber Wright as lacking legal merit.[11] But Jones appealed Webber Wright's ruling, and her suit gained traction following Clinton's admission to having an affair with Monica Lewinsky in August 1998.[12] (This admission indicated that Clinton may have lied under oath when he testified, in the Jones case, that he had never had a sexual relationship with Lewinsky.)
On appeal, in the midst of his trial for impeachment based on his testimony in the Jones case, Clinton was faced with the prospect of having to go under oath again and testify more about his sexual history. Instead, Clinton agreed to an out-of-court settlement, paying Jones and her lawyers $850,000 to drop the suit; a substantial amount of this money was used to pay Jones's legal fees.[13] Clinton's lawyer said that the President made the settlement only so he could end the lawsuit for good and move on with his life.[14]
In 2016, she spoke out, together with Clinton's two other accusers (Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey). They also criticized Hillary Clinton for enabling her husband's alleged abuse.
Kathleen Willey[edit]
In 1998, Kathleen Willey alleged Clinton groped her without consent in the White House Oval Office in 1993.[15] Kenneth Starr granted her immunity for her testimony in his separate inquiry.[16][17]
Linda Tripp, the Clinton Administration staffer who secretly taped her phone conversations with Monica Lewinsky in order to expose the latter's affair with the President, testified under oath that Willey's sexual contact with President Clinton in 1993 was consensual, that Willey had been flirting with the President, and that Willey was happy and excited following her 1993 encounter with Clinton.[18] Six other friends of Willey confirmed Tripp's account, that Willey had sought a sexual relationship with the President.[19] Ken Starr, who had deposed Willey in the course of investigating the sexual history of President Clinton, determined that she had lied under oath repeatedly to his investigators. Starr and his team therefore concluded that there was insufficient evidence to pursue her allegations further. In 2007 Willey published a book about her experiences with the Clintons.[20]
In 2016, she spoke out, together with Clinton's two other accusers (Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick), in favor of Donald Trump's campaign. The women defended Trump against his own allegations of sexual misconduct, which arose from leaked audio recordings in which he is alleged to have condoned sexual assault. They also criticized Hillary Clinton for enabling her husband's alleged abuse.
 
Last edited:
Still can't tell anyone how the sexual assault charges against Trump are any different than the claims made about Weinstein, eh? Just as I suspected.

Sure, I can, Zappacrite.

The charges against Weinstein are current. They are news-worthy. It's a huge scandal which is all over the news. They link sexual assault with your fellow DEMOCRATS like his good friends Hillary and the Obamas - who let their young daughter intern under him despite knowing him well.

The allegations against Trump are old, and likely wouldn't even be discussed right now - unless you needed a shiny object to distract the forum from your fellow DEMOCRAT.

Does that about cover it?
 
I hereby denounce any Democrat who has engaged in sexual assault and/or knowingly took money from a sexual assaulter.

Lets see a single Trump supporter take this same vow. Then we can talk about hypocrisy.
 
I'll just leave this here.


you-have-a-right-to-be-believed.jpg
 
I hereby denounce any Democrat who has engaged in sexual assault and/or knowingly took money from a sexual assaulter. Lets see a single Trump supporter take this same vow. Then we can talk about hypocrisy.

I hereby denounce any Republican who has engaged in sexual assault and/or knowingly took money from a sexual assaulter.
 
Back
Top