Trump's DC trial date set for March 4—one day before Super Tuesday

Concart said:
Setting a trial date is what a judge does. The defendants likes, dislikes, social commitments, vacations, etc are not part of the judges decision. That is not biased at all. It is part of the courts job. Trump knew he would be indicted. It’s the primary reason he is running. Too bad he’ll be in a prison cell on Election Day. Guess he should have thought of that at the time. Oops.
Click to expand...

The Judge is doing it to interefere in an election to help Biden. The Judge is not allowing time to read and analyze all the evidence from the prosecution
 
domer76 said:
Super Tuesday primaries have NOTHING to do with Biden, moron. And the trial is set to BEGIN that Monday. They won’t even have preliminary arguments by Tuesday, idiot.
Click to expand...

Yes they do. Biden wants the courts to interefere in the primaries so Trump is not the nominee for the Republicans
 
Tinkerpeach said:
This is an obvious attempt to try and derail Trumps campaign.
Click to expand...

His campaign is already off the rails. Any hope of a republican president in 2024 is in the toilet. The latest poll says 20% of republicans say he should drop out and that number goes up by the day. Don't worry though, he said he's running even if he isn't the nominee and he is convicted. Maybe if you have 2 right wing candidates running that means you have twice the chance of winning! :good4u:

Time to Quit’: Donald Trump Just Got Hit Hard With a ‘Horrible’ New Poll
20% of Republicans said Trump should suspend his campaign.
https://www.19fortyfive.com/2023/08/...ible-new-poll/
Click to expand...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Not true. Her sentencing of Jan 6 protesters usually has been outside of the federal guidelines. Her commentary on Jan 6 also shows a political bias.

Judge Chutkan Compares Jan. 6 to 9/11 Trials in Court
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ares-jan-6-to-911-trials-in-court/ar-AA1fYSnf

In Jan. 6 cases, 1 judge stands out as the toughest punisher
https://apnews.com/article/capitol-...s-sentencing-de394dd56b3251aac5a50014f4d6afa7

She has regularly ignored federal prosecutor recommendations on sentencing in plea deals and handed out far harsher sentences to Jan 6 defendants.

Judge in Trump Jan. 6 case is scion of Marxist revolutionaries
https://nypost.com/2023/08/26/judge-in-trump-jan-6-case-is-scion-of-marxists/

The Left doesn't deny any of that, but rather tries to excuse it...

Republicans Try To Discredit Judge In Trump’s Jan. 6 Case. Except They All Voted For Her.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republicans-discredit-judge-trump-jan-6_n_64cbca84e4b03ad2b89d6f39

In fact, reading up on her, I'd say she is possibly the worst best choice the Left could make in a judge to 'get' Trump. What that means is her background, demeanor, and courtroom results to date on Jan 6 and related matters means that however Trump's trial with her ends, and a conviction from her is likely, it's going to be horribly for the prosecution come the inevitable appeal. Unlike the Jan 6 cases where the defendants almost always plead out rather than go to trial, with Trump going to trial an appeal is a certainty. I doubt her rulings will stand up to scrutiny based on performance to date.

Thus, the Left gets a brief win but loses in the end because they used a 'ringer' rather than accept a fair trial to get it.
Click to expand...

The republican party used to say judges need to be tougher on crime and put shitheads like those who stormed our capitol behind bars. I don't think many really give a flyin fuck if Trump appeals his conviction as long as he is found guilty the first time around. Maybe the judge will give him a 2026 appeal date. One thing is for sure, the asshole does not stand a chance of ever being the president and his actions might mean we never again see a republican president.:)
 
ptif219 said:
Yes they do. Biden wants the courts to interefere in the primaries so Trump is not the nominee for the Republicans
Click to expand...

There is nothing Biden wants more than to crush that asshole again. Republicans don't stand a chance. 20% of them won't vote for him and he says he's running regardless of whether or not he is the nominee or convicted. Brainwashed shitheads like you will vote for him even if he is declared ineligible and not on the ballot. Just write his name in, that will show them!
 
Tinkerpeach said:
This is an obvious attempt to try and derail Trumps campaign.
Click to expand...

Yet another thing you have proved wrong on with your prior factual statements that 'no trials' would be allowed to go in before Cannons Florida trial that we argued over.

I wonder if you ever tire of being so wrong on statements you make as if fact?

Cannon and Trump screwed up, giving Trump more of what he wanted which was a far out court date. As i said here and then Tim Parlatore (Trumps prior attorney and best IMO) said after, 'he was surprised Trump team did not take the earlier Smith date in Florida and then just keep pushing it back in 3-6 increments thru motions', which he said is a normal way to extend the start of a trial easily up to 2 years, and 'prevent other cases jumping in front'.

I love that Trump pushes away his smarter lawyers and only keeps around the ones who will listen to him, Trump, as his best legal advocate. FLOL.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Not true. Her sentencing of Jan 6 protesters usually has been outside of the federal guidelines. Her commentary on Jan 6 also shows a political bias.

Judge Chutkan Compares Jan. 6 to 9/11 Trials in Court
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ares-jan-6-to-911-trials-in-court/ar-AA1fYSnf

In Jan. 6 cases, 1 judge stands out as the toughest punisher
https://apnews.com/article/capitol-...s-sentencing-de394dd56b3251aac5a50014f4d6afa7

She has regularly ignored federal prosecutor recommendations on sentencing in plea deals and handed out far harsher sentences to Jan 6 defendants.

Judge in Trump Jan. 6 case is scion of Marxist revolutionaries
https://nypost.com/2023/08/26/judge-in-trump-jan-6-case-is-scion-of-marxists/

The Left doesn't deny any of that, but rather tries to excuse it...

Republicans Try To Discredit Judge In Trump’s Jan. 6 Case. Except They All Voted For Her.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republicans-discredit-judge-trump-jan-6_n_64cbca84e4b03ad2b89d6f39

In fact, reading up on her, I'd say she is possibly the worst best choice the Left could make in a judge to 'get' Trump. What that means is her background, demeanor, and courtroom results to date on Jan 6 and related matters means that however Trump's trial with her ends, and a conviction from her is likely, it's going to be horribly for the prosecution come the inevitable appeal. Unlike the Jan 6 cases where the defendants almost always plead out rather than go to trial, with Trump going to trial an appeal is a certainty. I doubt her rulings will stand up to scrutiny based on performance to date.

Thus, the Left gets a brief win but loses in the end because they used a 'ringer' rather than accept a fair trial to get it.
Click to expand...

"Guidelines" are NOT requirements. There is NOTHING WRONG in going on the light side or heavy side of guidelines given the case and they are specifically made as 'guidelines' for that reason. Certain cases may justify some flex to the light or heavy side.

It is a risk for a judge to go outside the guidelines as it appealable and reversible at the higher courts. And in each instance she has not been reversed and the higher court agreed with her heavier sentencing.

So good luck to you in appeal as she has done fine so far in her career in that regard.

Unlike Cannon who got scathing reversals by a superior Court (one of the most conservative in the country) who basically mocked her for going so far outside the law and crafting lawless rational to help Trump as she thought a "POTUS' needed special considerations.
 
ptif219 said:
The Judge is doing it to interefere in an election to help Biden. The Judge is not allowing time to read and analyze all the evidence from the prosecution
Click to expand...

GOOD.

Not charging Trump would be both a travesty of law and justice and it would be interfering in the election to benefit Trump.


Allowing anyone to try and steal one election, to stay in power, and then just allowing them to declare 'I am running in the net election' as a way to never get charged, would just be a stupid precedent to have.

Of course stupid people would want that though.
 
Trump is a person who never gave a fuck about injustices to anybody else,
so even if he is getting a stake shoved up his ass,
why in the world should we care?
 
ptif219 said:
Problem is no one is stopping it and charging Biden with his crimes
Click to expand...

And that is because each and every time, despite the republi'cans' taking wayyyyyyy more time to investigate Biden, Obama, Hillary, etc they always come up with nothing burgers and you need at least a Ham sandwich to get a Grand jury to indict.

When Comer was on Fox news recently and asked if after 5 years of investigations they had any concrete evidence they could present to a Grand Jury, his reply was 'we are working on it'.

He admitted this, just as McCarthy admitted re Benghazi, is solely a smear campaign and not intended for charges as charges do not end well for republi'cans' as John Durham found out. the opposite of when Trump complicit republi'cans' get charged and boat loads of them go to jail.
 
QP! said:
Yet another thing you have proved wrong on with your prior factual statements that 'no trials' would be allowed to go in before Cannons Florida trial that we argued over.

I wonder if you ever tire of being so wrong on statements you make as if fact?

Cannon and Trump screwed up, giving Trump more of what he wanted which was a far out court date. As i said here and then Tim Parlatore (Trumps prior attorney and best IMO) said after, 'he was surprised Trump team did not take the earlier Smith date in Florida and then just keep pushing it back in 3-6 increments thru motions', which he said is a normal way to extend the start of a trial easily up to 2 years, and 'prevent other cases jumping in front'.

I love that Trump pushes away his smarter lawyers and only keeps around the ones who will listen to him, Trump, as his best legal advocate. FLOL.
Click to expand...

The trial hasn't started yet, wait and see before you declare me wrong.

Start dates are tentative.
 
Port Tack said:
His campaign is already off the rails. Any hope of a republican president in 2024 is in the toilet. The latest poll says 20% of republicans say he should drop out and that number goes up by the day. Don't worry though, he said he's running even if he isn't the nominee and he is convicted. Maybe if you have 2 right wing candidates running that means you have twice the chance of winning! :good4u:
Click to expand...

Bad news for you, even more people don't want Biden to run.
 
ptif219 said:
More proof the judge is biased and working for the Biden campaign. More proof this is a show trial to stop Trump from beating Biden in the Election
Click to expand...

Would you stop crying? You and Trump both need to put your BIG GIRL panties on!

For crying out loud! :palm:

baby-cute.gif
 
Port Tack said:
The republican party used to say judges need to be tougher on crime and put shitheads like those who stormed our capitol behind bars. I don't think many really give a flyin fuck if Trump appeals his conviction as long as he is found guilty the first time around. Maybe the judge will give him a 2026 appeal date. One thing is for sure, the asshole does not stand a chance of ever being the president and his actions might mean we never again see a republican president.:)
Click to expand...

She is handing out prison time for trespassing. It's like sentencing someone to life for jaywalking. The judge doesn't get to set the appeal date, the appeals court, a panel of three judges, does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top