T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
No, it wasn't. No underlying crime necessary for the charges to rise to a felony were ever submitted. The judge ruled against the defense bringing expert witnesses. Even in the jury instructions, the judge told the jury in essence "If you think the defendant committed a crime and covered it up with these bookkeeping entries, that's sufficient to meet the standard," even though it wasn't and isn't. The prosecution stacked the charges rather than as normal, bring one charge for all the entries. The prosecution deliberately made each entry a separate crime, something never done before with that law.trump's case was laid out in minute detail and the chain of evidence proved that he was guilty. Magats get confused by detail and undoubtedly couldn't follow the case closely because of their lack of brain power, so they fall back on lies and slogans.