I do not believe so.
There would be no "strengthening" of the class system. Those same people can take their $10,000 and go elsewhere already. That is the weakest part of the argument against vouchers.
And I can't believe that conservatives support a welfare education program, which is exactly what the voucher system is. I listen to right wingers on this site complain about people who don't actually pay anything in taxes getting a refund because of the child tax credit but you have NO PROBLEM with people getting more money out of the system than they paid into it. Then you all whine about Chelsea getting to go to Sidwell and why can't OUR kids go there. They can't because you can't afford it and even with vouchers most of you would not be able to send your kids there. Kids would also be better off if they all were transported around by safer vehicles so can I have a Mercedes voucher so I can transport my kids in a safer car? Also, if you don't mind, rich kids seem to eat better so can I have a caviar and filet mignon voucher? I know ad absurdium. But Vouchers are a welfare program aimed primarily at funding religious schools with public money.
This is a self-limited view of how vouchers work, but that's okay too. We can just throw more money at the system that produces the least-educated children ever and pretend that fixes it. Remove the standards (as the teacher's union wants us to because it makes the 'teach to the test') let them continue to stupefy our kids and pretend that recycle fundraisers are "education"...
Hence you use "good regulation", but only at the state level. Public Education is not a power granted to the Feds, it is therefore either a State or a personal power.
First off I am not saying keep everything the same. What we heed a school system that does not teach to the lowest common denominator and one that recognizes that not all our children are going to be doctors or lawyers, or even med techs and paralegals. We need to recognize that some kids are going to be mechanics, and soldiers and receptionists and even trash collectors and school janitors and that they don't all need 12 years of education. We need to quit teaching kids to take a test and start teaching them information that will profide them with the knowledge to pass any test on that knowledge. We need to quit letting kids opt out of science classes that teach how babies are made and how to keep them from being made and quit talking about whether or not we should teach creationism in a SCIENCE class. And you are right, we need to readjust the teaching profession. I have an idea, if you teach math you should have a degree in math. If you teach english your degree should be in english. Teach sciences, degree in that particular science, and the teachers that teach should be able to pass any test on the subject they teach. Do away with tenure. Only in state and federal goverment jobs do people expect to be able to die at that job. But if you look at other countries that do well at educating their kids you will see that the bulk of them have one minister of education and one tough ass standard for the track that those children are in. A child in Alabama should be learing the exact same things as a child in California.
I am saying the state has an education that they are providing for the children in their state. It is not the job of the state to provide money so the First Church of the Jewish Zombie can teach their rose colored education.