Wikipedia discarded on sight. You cannot use that reference with me.There are plenty of communes still going today.
...deleted Holy Link...
There are new communes all the time to replace the ones that failed. They will fail just the same.
Wikipedia discarded on sight. You cannot use that reference with me.There are plenty of communes still going today.
...deleted Holy Link...
Wikipedia discarded on sight. You cannot use that reference with me.
There are new communes all the time to replace the ones that failed. They will fail just the same.
Wikipedia articles are too often badly written, biased, or just plain wrong.Why not?
No, it doesn't. It only sources information favorable to the article.That wikipedia article sources everything.
You can't use the National Geographic magazine either. Neither can you use the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Associated Press, Reuters, the UK Guardian, or any poll or newspaper....deleted Holy Link...
Wikipedia discarded on sight. You cannot use that reference with me.
There are new communes all the time to replace the ones that failed. They will fail just the same.
Wikipedia articles are too often badly written, biased, or just plain wrong.
No, it doesn't. It only sources information favorable to the article.
You can't use the National Geographic magazine either. Neither can you use the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Associated Press, Reuters, the UK Guardian, or any poll or newspaper.
None of these are authoritative or valid references. False authority fallacy.