What kind of "Christian values" do Conservatives want?

[rjhenn]

What theist is twisting your arm to post here?

All of you.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Mason Michaels]

That's obviously what you're dealing with. You're terrified that your beliefs are really based on nothing. And you can't justify those beliefs with any facts. All you've got is wishful thinking.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I didn't search for God,he came to me

 

[Dutch Uncle]

They are beliefs based on nothing but wishful thinking. It is statistically certain that there is other life in the universe. You accuse others of arguing from emotion because you can't conceive of arguing from any other basis.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Awesome! I'll await your proof and thoroughly convincing evidence.

Fermi's Paradox. You have no evidence.

Sent from my car using my neighbor's Wi-Fi

 

[Mason Michaels]

Both are based on wishful thinking.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

To Spiritual blind like you that sounds right.
But it's because you are blind you can't comprehend

 

[Mason Michaels]

There's no such thing as debating religion since religion has no basis in reality.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Only to the blind,like you

 

[rjhenn]

I didn't search for God,he came to me

Drugs or head injurie? Or serious illness?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

To Spiritual blind like you that sounds right.
But it's because you are blind you can't comprehend

You mean because I'm not delusional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Mason Michaels]

All of you.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

So you're typing one handed.Lame excuse

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I didn't search for God,he came to me

Based on the results, it's more likely you were visited by Satan.

 

[Mason Michaels]

You mean because I'm not delusional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

But you are

 

[Mason Michaels]

Drugs or head injurie? Or serious illness?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Is that your claim for all believers.
Just once has it every entered your closed mind,you haven't found God?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

"It's lame and repetitive, Dick. Completely lacking in intelligence and originality. I give it a 62."

 

[Cypress]

History is always at the mercy of current social struggles, and it's been said, truly I think, that it is essentially the propaganda of the victors. On the other hand, the denial of historical figures clearly depends on evidence. Was there a King Arthur, for instance? Almost certainly no, though there was probably a military leader called Arthur around the right time. Kings and princes had their own poets to record their activities - we can just say that the name starts cropping up in royal pedigrees from about the right time. There is very little evidence for those who aren't part of a governing class, but some people are so striking as to break through, and some have advantages. Socrates, for instance, was far too sympathetic with those the Athenian democrats called 'the fat' to be forgotten, and Jesus clearly produced a very large number of followers, who remembered his words, as well as a propagandist called Paul, who confused matters rather. The existence of these persons, however, is so powerfully part of history that it is simply daft to try to deny their existence.

Good work, and I concur.

This isnt about theology or religion.

This is about the long-accepted standards and practices of historical scholarship. That means to me, this thread is not fundamentally about religion. It is about ignorance and denial of scholarship

 

[rjhenn]

Awesome! I'll await your proof and thoroughly convincing evidence.

Fermi's Paradox. You have no evidence.

Sent from my car using my neighbor's Wi-Fi

There are billions of galaxies in the universe. There are billions of habitable planets in each galaxy. It is statistically certain that there is life somewhere else besides here. Believing otherwise is as irrational as believing in an omnipotent and omniscient God who refuses to make Himself known. Or who is unable to make Himself known.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Only to the blind,like you

You believe in a God who is unable to demonstrate His existence.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Based on the results, it's more likely you were visited by Satan.

It's more likely that Satan exists and has been masquerading as God.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

But you are

No, you are.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Is that your claim for all believers.
Just once has it every entered your closed mind,you haven't found God?

You mean your omnipotent and omniscient God. Who spends all of His time and effort hiding from mankind.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Actually that is the typical militant theist when faced with reality.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

It applies to anyone, be it atheist or theist, who is too emotionally invested in the topic to accept different belief systems.

Examples: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...t-do-Conservatives-want&p=3658483#post3658483

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...t-do-Conservatives-want&p=3658555#post3658555

Sent from an a SM-G950U I found in a subway toilet.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

There are billions of galaxies in the universe. There are billions of habitable planets in each galaxy. It is statistically certain that there is life somewhere else besides here. Believing otherwise is as irrational as believing in an omnipotent and omniscient God who refuses to make Himself known. Or who is unable to make Himself known.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

ROFLMAO. No wonder you're so fucked up. You think an educated guess equals proof. Jesus fucking Keeerist, dude. What the fuck are they teaching you kids in schools these days? "New Math"?

Sent from my 1970s sliderule