He is determining if they did... but they are stonewalling. The allegation was made, and he has the duty to determine if its true. Otherwise you are making President = absolute ruler.
Who is willing to go on record saying they believe the President can defy legal court orders?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Dear Dumbass, how is the judge able to do that if there's no list of who was on those planes? Can you prove they were all MS-13 gang members and none were American citizens?
He cant answer and hold onto his delusion and anger.
I am glad you abandoned your "ex-parte" definition invalidated the law.
He has not claimed the have violated the law of Constitution.
They have the authority to determine if the EB has violated the law and if so, to order they stop the violation. Subject to appeal.
I abandoned nothing.
The district courts of this country do not have the authority to direct the functions of the Executive Branch…period.
They have the authority to determine if they violated the law and constitution and to enjoin them from further violation, subject to appeal.
You did, and it was the right thing to do.
He was directing the planes to return, a direct overreach of his authority.
No, you did.
The district courts of this country do not have the authority to direct the functions of the Executive Branch…period.
The legislative body has the power to change the law. It's like you don't know the basics. The man is referencing the only one with the power to take away a non-justiciable law is the body that created the law. The question is can the judge make a determination as to who or what constitutes a terrorist organization? The law is written for the Executive to make that determination, not a judge.
So, this questions whether the ruling is itself legal and provides a pathway to appeal. As a coequal branch of government they continue what they are doing.... It is interesting to see where this will end up. Will the SCOTUS rule that the President, per the law, has the ability to say that this organization is an entity that "threatens invasion or predatory incursion", or will it rule that the law does not allow a terrorist organization to be considered to be an entity that "threatens invasion or predatory incursion"?
Airline pilots over international airspace are the authority. A Federal judge has no jurisdiction.
IN some circumstances they do, subject to appeal.
Where did I suggest the legislative body did not have the power to change the law?
What ruling?
The fact that Maduro released them on to the US will carry a lot of weight IMHO