I have respect at least for this type of discussion and argument.
Much better than what the McCain campaign is pushing.
that site is a liberal hornets nest, I wouldn't call that bipartisan at all.
There are a lot of conservatives who post here; the "liberal domination" of the board is vastly overplayed.
It's just that the liberals tend to be smarter; much smarter...
Darla pwned. Reduced to, "Well you might be right but the American people agree with me! Hahahaha!"
There are a lot of conservatives who post here; the "liberal domination" of the board is vastly overplayed.
It's just that the liberals tend to be smarter; much smarter...
Not at all. I posted evidence, you just choose to believe yours.
Because there is 5 times the amount of supporting evidence for my point.This is utterly laughable. If the battle has been "won" by your side in the field of public opinion, it has been utterly defeated for decades academically.
moron oncelor I'm talking about the site that Darla's study came from
laughable Darla, it says liberal think tank in the first paragraph.
you are so cute in you little rant it's funny.
Note to Darla, these are politicians with economics degrees not economist.
They are Jarrod Berstien and the little clinton guy that are brought on CNBC every time they need a turbo-lib to argue against conventional economic theory.
Dhula everything previously you posted came from liberal political sites not economics.
You are smart enough to google and cut and paste but you don't know what your looking at. I doubt you research consensus economic numbers much, show me that and I'm with you.