Why do people still believe in Jesus and Christianity?

NiftyNiblick said:
I don't give a fat fuck what mythical characters people choose to worship.

When they try to impose their absurd religious views onto the laws of the land, however, that's when we see the huge mistake made by the founders.

We needed freedom FROM, not OF, religion.

Theocracy has always been among the biggest obstacles to a civilized society.
Click to expand...

Dude, get a fucking grip. We do have freedom from religion.


Disagreed on the place of theocracy in history. It's a tool. It's like saying chemistry has been among the biggest obstacles to civilized society because it created gunpowder.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Dude, get a fucking grip. We do have freedom from religion.


Disagreed on the place of theocracy in history. It's a tool. It's like saying chemistry has been among the biggest obstacles to civilized society because it created gunpowder.
Click to expand...

Look at the SCOTUS and tell me again that we have freedom from religion.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I don't give a fat fuck what mythical characters people choose to worship.

When they try to impose their absurd religious views onto the laws of the land, however, that's when we see the huge mistake made by the founders.

We needed freedom FROM, not OF, religion.

Theocracy has always been among the biggest obstacles to a civilized society.
Click to expand...

A pluralistic society, which guarantees freedom of thought and faith, has the best historical record.

Strictly Atheist societies which sought to eliminate religion do not have a good track record.

The USSR was explicitly atheist, they made state atheism official policy, and they attemped to outlaw and repress religious faith. The atheist USSR was one of the most murderous regimes in history, and went to great lengths to imprison and murder hundreds of thousands of priests, bishops, deacons, and religious lay persons
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Opposittion to abortion and LGBT rights is entirely based on inane religious superstition and bigotry.
Click to expand...

Correct. So? So is fucking in public or abusing children. They have drawn the line, for religion, at homosexuality and abortion. Where do you draw the line?

What laws would you impose on others regardless if they liked it or not?
 
Not abusing children is not a religious position.
The insane bible calls for child abuse, truth be told. Secular humanism opposed child abuse.

Not fucking in the street is merely a social convention depending on the culture of the times.
Public fucking offends the majority today, but fuck privately as you wish.
Same with taking a dump in public, actually. Is that a religious issue?
And Victorian times frowned on public breast feeding, but it's commonplace now.

Tomorrow could be totally different--even for fucking in the street.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Not abusing children is not a religious position.
The insane bible calls for child abuse, truth be told. Secular humanism opposed child abuse.

Not fucking in the street is merely a social convention depending on the culture of the times.
Public fucking offends the majority today, but fuck privately as you wish.
Same with taking a dump in public, actually. Is that a religious issue?
And Victorian times frowned on public breast feeding, but it's commonplace now.

Tomorrow could be totally different--even for fucking in the street.
Click to expand...

Where do you draw the line and why? Based on what empirical science?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Where do you draw the line and why? Based on what empirical science?
Click to expand...

The determining sciences in this case are anthropology and sociology. I have only undergraduate familiarity with both, but there are elite minds in academia whose opinions are valued by intelligent people and disputed by Joe Sixpack Trumpanzees who can't write a simple declarative sentence intelligibly. I'm not a populist. I respect knowledge.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
The determining sciences in this case are anthropology and sociology. I have only undergraduate familiarity with both, but there are elite minds in academia whose opinions are valued by intelligent people and disputed by Joe Sixpack Trumpanzees who can't write a simple declarative sentence intelligibly. I'm not a populist. I respect knowledge.
Click to expand...

Great. So where do you draw the line on sexual morality? Based on what logic? Or will you use Justice Stewart's logic?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobellis_v._Ohio#Supreme_Court
Justice Potter Stewart's concurrence, stating that the Constitution protected all obscenity except "hard-core pornography". He wrote, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that."
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Look at the SCOTUS and tell me again that we have freedom from religion.
Click to expand...
there isn't bright line on separation of church and state.
It meas "no establishment of a state religion" Yet religions get tax breaks.

The government protects religious freedom by Amendment 1. what it cannot do is favor one religion over the other or use religious test to hold office. It cannot compel religious activity either
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Look at the SCOTUS and tell me again that we have freedom from religion.
Click to expand...

As these ongoing Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate lynching enforcement Christiananality pedophilia super egos fabricated misnomer immaculate stole a vote conception malfeasance avoidance of accepting a rebuttal to SCOTUS Rehnquist's Bicentennial diatribe that one must vote joke, in addition to one must attend a house of worship after their supreme swastika up Uranus Reichquest acknowledgement of thieving absentee voting ballots arsonists as reason to not even waste my time apparently isn't standing in their "serve the Pope or die" at the hands of Islam "death to the infidels" years later for those burning Bush's 9/11 patriot act health care plan as all those 9/11 holycosts were about as significant as all those thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament - absentee voting ballots arsonists megalomaniacal crusade suicidal sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming malfeasance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top