Why don't you Libtard/ Progressives/ Democrats just say it?

WinterBorn said:
I agree. The only reason I mentioned the other "icky" things is to make the point that I don't want to watch other people having sex. But that doesn't mean I am bothered by knowing it happens.

Besides, none of this is really about sex acts. Because the sex acts are happening anyway.
Click to expand...


TA-DA!!!
Give that man a cigar.
 
Socrtease said:
No, the status quo is that one half of all married couples split, second and subsequent marriages are even worse. So it is up to you to prove that of those that stay together and have kids their kids grow up better, more stable, more successful, than all the others. YOU CAN'T DO IT.
Click to expand...
These are all symptoms of a 'sex with anyone, anytime' society that lib-tards have created, and you want more of it?
 
RStringfield said:
You have no right to restrain people based on some ignorant assumption. Again, there is absolutely no reason to believe sexual preference has any affect on parenting. Why would it?

You are not only denying homosexuals. You are denying children, many who go unadopted, a home.
Click to expand...
There are waiting lists of normal parents ready to adopt kids.
 
So back to the OP:

You Lib-Tards hate the Constitution, treat it like a joke, ignore it when you can and want to dump it in the trash heap. Why don't you Libtard/ Progressives/ Democrats be honest for once and just say it?
 
Ice Dancer said:
Children should not be the subjects of social experiments.
Click to expand...

Leaving children unadopted based on some stupid assumption shows you do not care about kids. Your basis for this assumption is bigotry and hate. Again, there is absolutely no good reason to assume that homosexuals cannot be good parents. You guys are making a claim that is rather extraordinary. The burden of proof is on you.
 
Southern Man said:
So back to the OP:

You Lib-Tards hate the Constitution, treat it like a joke, ignore it when you can and want to dump it in the trash heap. Why don't you Libtard/ Progressives/ Democrats be honest for once and just say it?
Click to expand...

And Conservatives always follow the US Constitution?? Don't be ridiculous.
 
I have to go with the gay activists on this one. Any person that says a child is better off in an orphanage than with gay parents is brainwashed away from the light of christ.
 
Southern Man said:
These are all symptoms of a 'sex with anyone, anytime' society that lib-tards have created, and you want more of it?
Click to expand...

What the hell makes you think you and your ilk have the right to tell anyone who they can and cannot have sex with?
 
AssHatZombie said:
I have to go with the gay activists on this one. Any person that says a child is better off in an orphanage than with gay parents is brainwashed away from the light of christ.
Click to expand...
That's not what I'm saying. I just think that queers should go towards the back of the line when adopting kids.
 
Southern Man said:
That's not what I'm saying. I just think that queers should go towards the back of the line when adopting kids.
Click to expand...

WTF? Why is that? You are saying they should not be considered unless no one else wants the kid?

So its not about the best parents or best situation, its about making sure ultra conservatives are not offended?

Nonsense.
 
Southern Man said:
There are waiting lists of normal parents ready to adopt kids.
Click to expand...

Just because there are waiting lists does not mean there are plenty of potential adoptive parents. Many are specific in what they want in a child. So they may wait for a baby of a certain color, gender or some other attribute.
 
Southern Man said:
That's like five or so straw men in a row. Some one must be desperate for attention. :)
Click to expand...

Thats not a strawman at all. YOu are saying you want them to go to the back of the line. I am saying that the best family for the child should be the adoptive parents. There are many factors involved, such as age, financial resources, work schedule (to allow time for parenting), education, length of time in their relationship, ect.

YOu want to boil it down to sexual orientation first and foremost. And that seems to matter more than the other factors, while it has little or no effect on parenting. It has more to do with not offending people who think they should have a say in the matter.

As the website said, there are 127,000 children in foster care awaiting adoption.
 
RStringfield said:
Just because there are waiting lists does not mean there are plenty of potential adoptive parents. Many are specific in what they want in a child. So they may wait for a baby of a certain color, gender or some other attribute.
Click to expand...
Many don't care yet still wait. I know a lesbian couple that just adopted two kids, both less than three years old, perfect health, blond hair and blue eyes, both beautiful kids. What normal couple didn't want them?
 
Last edited:
Southern Man said:
Many don't care yet still wait. I know a lesbian couple that just adopted two kids, both less than three years old, perfect health, blond hair and blue eyes, both beautiful kids. What normal couple didn't want them?
Click to expand...

Why would there be anyone better for the children than the lesbian couple?
 
Southern Man said:
That's not what I'm saying. I just think that queers should go towards the back of the line when adopting kids.
Click to expand...

Another line lifted from the civil rights struggle. If the GOP insists on listening to small minded social conservatives they should change their symbol to a dinosaur. New slogan too... "The party that evolution forgot."
 
RStringfield said:
Another line lifted from the civil rights struggle. If the GOP insists on listening to small minded social conservatives they should change their symbol to a dinosaur. New slogan too... "The party that evolution forgot."
Click to expand...
"Appeal to Ridicule" means that you are losing the debate. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top