IBDaMann
Well-known member
I have a much better idea. Stop being an intellectual coward. You should always be the source for all of your claims. No one can claim that you don't claim what you claim. Additionally, if you are in error, pointing to someone else on the internet who is equally in error does not support your argument. In the case of your religion, just state that it is your faith and you believe what you believe; no one can take that away from you. You don't see Christians pretending that their religion is thettled thienth. Ask gfm7175 the next time he's online if his faith in God is thettled thienth; if it were science, it wouldn't be his faith now would it? You're stuck trying to prove that your faith is somehow science, but there is no science of any religious faith.
The clergy of your religion have lied to you. They have bent you over furniture and abused your colon. You don't owe them anything. Ditch the lie, or be forever relegated to getting spanked on the internet by those who actually understand science.
Clearly you aren't smart enough to recognize a religion when it is right in front of you, even one that you have adopted. You cannot explain in what sense Christianity is a religion but that your religion is somehow not.
Usually, but it's not mandatory. Perhaps you did not participate in the various threads here on JPP where this was discussed and resolved. Buddhism is a religion without any deity; the Buddhist monks resolve the debate as to whether Buddhism is a religion or just a "philosophy." Similarly, Shintō and the many indigenous native American religions have no gods, but rather believe in the spirits of things in nature.
The Climate faiths, however, do have a deity at their core, i.e. the goddess Climate. I fully acknowledge that worshipers of Climate are barred from referring to Climate as the goddess that She is because all are commanded to profess that the faith is thettled thienth and to deny that the religion is a religion. Climate, however, punishes humanity for its carbon sins, and it is always a punishment, i.e. a drought where rain is needed and flooding rain where less precipitation is needed. The Climate congregation is required to honor Climate by exacting Climate justice for Her, whereas Christians are required to honor God by obeying Gods laws. Climate worshipers declare holy Climate places as "sacred", e.g. Climate ground zeroes, in the same way Muslims have declared Mecca and Media holy and sacred. Christians refer to nobelievers as "pagans," Muslims use "infidels" and the Climate congregation uses "deniers." Muslims refer to the message of Q'ran as "Islam", Christians refer to the message of the Bible as "The Word of God" and warmizombies refer to the message of Climate as "The Science."
Ergo, Christians can say "IBDaMann is a pagan who does not accept the Word of God." Muslims can say "IBDaMann is an infidel who does not accept Islam." You can say "IBDaMann is a denier who doesn't accept The Science."
There is no science in your religion. Christian Science is a religious faith, despite having the word "Science" in the name. Climate Science is a religious faith, despite having the word "Science" in the name.
Nice pivot. You did not fool me. You were discussing greenhouse gas as insulation. It isn't. You tried to use cars and greenhouses on hot days as examples of how greenhouse gas is an insulation. Your examples show that you are terribly scientifically illiterate. I'm just pointing this out to you. It appears that you never took a science class in your life.
