I never said greenhouse gases create energy.
It's called logic. You say all the things that conclude the creation of energy out of nothing. It doesn't matter that you never state your conclusions. Others are free to use formal logic and you don't get to deny it.
I'll run through it again for you:
You claim, nay insist on, an increase in temperature. You never say that you are claiming an increase in thermal energy but you don't have to. An increase in temperature can only happen with an increase in thermal energy. Thermal energy is what gives matter temperature. Now you can bitch and whine and moan and cry like a fucking baby that you never claimed an increase in thermal energy, but you did. You claimed an increase in temperature and that is sufficient to have claimed an increase in the quantity of thermal energy. You gave yourself no wiggle room. It matters not that you are scientifically illiterate and had no idea that that is what you were saying. You should have learned some science before you submissively allowed yourself to be bent over furniture. You claimed an increase in the quantity of thermal energy via your insistence of a temperature increase.
Once again, it doesn't matter what you never said.
You claim that your mystical, magical greenhouse substance causes this increase in thermal energy. Yes, this is your claim and you stick to it. Well, there you have it ... your mystical, magical greenhouse substance somehow causes the creation of additional thermal energy. You insist it.
Once again, it doesn't matter what you never said.
Perhaps if you weren't such a scientifically illiterate moron, you wouldn't be insisting an nearly as many physics violations as you do. As it stands, your religion has you spouting off endless chains of absurd physics violations, and prohibits you from learning anything that I teach you. That makes you stupid, and yes, you therefore make it all about you and your inane devotion to that which is demonstrably FALSE.
Then we get into your laughable inability to respond to any commentary, forcing you to EVADE the myriad of questions you cannot answer. Of course it's all about you; you make it be that way when you refuse to discuss the topic by EVADING all question posed to you. Start answering my questions and I'll be able to return the topic to
Global Warming from your scientific illiteracy and your inability to learn. As it stands, you have shifted the topic to your EVASION and your total dishonesty. Your religion is stupid and so are you, but I guess you like it that way.
In fact, a lack of creating energy was the entire focus of the , what, 7 days and 8 pages of me trying to establish that the inside of a car gets hotter DESPITE no additional energy from the sun.
Let's unpack this. You spent 7 days and 8 pages denying convection. The denial and dishonesty was on your end. You refuse to listen and to learn. You take great pride in being stupid. You ventured into irrelevant scenarios just to EVADE my questions that would have otherwise gotten to the root of your error. So, no, you did nothing to cancel any of the thermodynamics problems that kill your religion dead.
The entire focus, or what I've been trying to focus on, has been the fact that CO2 and other greenhouse gases, absorbs IR energy and, because of it's molecular make-up, radiated that absorbed energy in the form of thermal energy that then warms the atmosphere/earth.
This convoluted sentence reads that you have been trying to make the argument that CO2 redistributes existing thermal energy in such a way as to create more of it. Once again, it doesn't matter that you didn't use those exact words, it is nonetheless what you said.
By the way, all matter radiates electromagnetic radiation, e.g. (IR), never thermal energy. You are trying to claim that CO2 radiates thermal energy, because you don't know any better. Perhaps you were confused that RADIANCE is sometimes referred to "thermal radiation" but that is not thermal energy, it is electromagnetic. Pay attention or you will earn yourself a whole lot more mockery if you repeat this error.
what is it that you believe the atmosphere is doing to regulate the high and low temperatures?
You just asked a theological question, denoting your religious perspective. It is not the case that the atmosphere performs any "regulating" or "balancing." Those are holy "forcings" of your religion and while they are fundamental elements of your religious dogma, they do not really exist in nature and are not to be found in science.
You also asked what I
believe is happening, as though this is a question of religious beliefs. Science has all of this covered and you should learn it. Your religion runs counter to science; that should be patently obvious by now. It should have been a wake-up call to you when the number of questions that you could not answer without violating physics entered double digits.
Are there any dead people for whom you'd like to pretend to speak about now?
What would happen to the temperature of a cloud of oxygen and/or nitrogen as it comes within close proximity to the sun? The answer to this question leads to all the rest of the answers, so answer it before you ask any more questions.
