Will JPP survive?

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
Leftists are demanding that any forum that allows people to say things they deem "dangerous" or hold opinions they claim are "disinformation" must be deplatformed.

JPP's owner has already faced one blockage of the JPP Twitter account (he deleted the Tweet).

This title got tweeted out, and Twitter blocked our account. That's a boo.

I pointed out that the delicate snowflakes @Twitter seem selective in their poutrage.


What's to prevent the hosting company from deplatforming justplainpolitics.com?

Discuss.
 
Leftists are demanding that any forum that allows people to say things they deem "dangerous" or hold opinions they claim are "disinformation" must be deplatformed.

JPP's owner has already faced one blockage of the JPP Twitter account (he deleted the Tweet).



I pointed out that the delicate snowflakes @Twitter seem selective in their poutrage.



What's to prevent the hosting company from deplatforming justplainpolitics.com?

Discuss.

Nothing really, they can. However it does not break their rules, it isn't porn, etc.
 
Nothing really, they can. However it does not break their rules, it isn't porn, etc.

I know.

Since you're here, do you think Just Plain Politics will still be around after the usurper's minions begin "consulting" with their eager allies in private enterprise?

By "consulting", I mean making and distributing lists of websites they want to remove from the Interwebs.
 
I know.

Since you're here, do you think Just Plain Politics will still be around after the usurper's minions begin "consulting" with their eager allies in private enterprise?

By "consulting", I mean making and distributing lists of websites they want to remove from the Interwebs.

I don't know. You'd have to ask their minions that are on the site. Do they think they'd try to defend JPP or should we just make sure that nobody with a different opinion is ever able to communicate publicly?
 
I don't know. You'd have to ask their minions that are on the site. Do they think they'd try to defend JPP or should we just make sure that nobody with a different opinion is ever able to communicate publicly?

I didn't mean the usurper's minions that are on this site. I meant the actual Administration flunkies who are going to be "defeating dangerous disinformation" in a "public/private partnership" with tech companies.

https://raskin.house.gov/media/pres...-biden-administration-fighting-disinformation

And, no, I don't think any of JPP's minions of mendacity would defend JPP. They clearly believe (based on recent posts) that nobody with a different opinion should ever able to communicate publicly, and many want to go further - they want to criminalize speech they don't agree with.


I have some suggested reading for you and anyone else concerned about this trend:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?158573-Our-forum-may-not-be-here-soon

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?158832-Think-Firefox-is-your-friend

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?158839-The-Digital-Imprimatur-is-here
 
I didn't mean the usurper's minions that are on this site. I meant the actual Administration flunkies who are going to be "defeating dangerous disinformation" in a "public/private partnership" with tech companies.

https://raskin.house.gov/media/pres...-biden-administration-fighting-disinformation

And, no, I don't think any of JPP's minions of mendacity would defend JPP. They clearly believe (based on recent posts) that nobody with a different opinion should ever able to communicate publicly, and many want to go further - they want to criminalize speech they don't agree with.


I have some suggested reading for you and anyone else concerned about this trend:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?158573-Our-forum-may-not-be-here-soon

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?158832-Think-Firefox-is-your-friend

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?158839-The-Digital-Imprimatur-is-here

However, those minions will have their own minions... Will this site be reported? Maybe, but will the Ds on this site act to defend this site or just clap as the government works to shut it down because some folks say things they disagree with... ?
 
HWill this site be reported? Maybe, but will the Ds on this site act to defend this site or just clap as the government works to shut it down because some folks say things they disagree with... ?

As I said, I don't think any of JPP's minions of mendacity would defend JPP as it is currently configured regarding freedom of expression.

They clearly believe (based on recent posts) that nobody with a different opinion should ever able to communicate publicly, and many want to go further - they want to criminalize speech they don't agree with.

GoDaddy (or Domains By Proxy, or whoever your hosting contract is with) is unlikely to "resist", either, IMO.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Rana is willing to doxx you and expose you to your employers as a "danger to democracy".
 
As I said, I don't think any of JPP's minions of mendacity would defend JPP as it is currently configured regarding freedom of expression.

They clearly believe (based on recent posts) that nobody with a different opinion should ever able to communicate publicly, and many want to go further - they want to criminalize speech they don't agree with.

GoDaddy (or Domains By Proxy, or whoever your hosting contract is with) is unlikely to "resist", either, IMO.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Rana is willing to doxx you and expose you to your employers as a "danger to democracy".

amazonerds love to shut down sites.....
 
Comical how now the right suddenly has a crusade over supposed censorship cause Trump got thrown off social media, actually a deflection to move attention off of Trump's post election debacle, especially the culminating events of last Wednesday

They just love the martyr role, plays well with the demogogues
 
Comical how now the right suddenly has a crusade over supposed censorship cause Trump got thrown off social media, actually a deflection to move attention off of Trump's post election debacle, especially the culminating events of last Wednesday

They just love the martyr role, plays well with the demogogues

Funny how we have a thread here seriously suggesting that folks that were simply in the capital at the time that riots happened means that the same folks should be in prison and that the left are the ones suggesting it...

Actually, it isn't funny. Folks who think that political opponents should spend time in jail because of some folks who rioted ignore the fact that both sides have these fringe folks that riot.

Rioters can serve time, after a trial. Folks who were protesting without damage, not so much.

Pretending that this is about social media, "priceless" I guess...
 
As I said, I don't think any of JPP's minions of mendacity would defend JPP as it is currently configured regarding freedom of expression.

They clearly believe (based on recent posts) that nobody with a different opinion should ever able to communicate publicly, and many want to go further - they want to criminalize speech they don't agree with.

GoDaddy (or Domains By Proxy, or whoever your hosting contract is with) is unlikely to "resist", either, IMO.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Rana is willing to doxx you and expose you to your employers as a "danger to democracy".
Legion Troll
 
Comical how now the right suddenly has a crusade over supposed censorship cause Trump got thrown off social media, actually a deflection to move attention off of Trump's post election debacle, especially the culminating events of last Wednesday They just love the martyr role, plays well with the demogogues

This thread isn't about Trump, Anchovies.

It's about JPP's future.

And it's not about last Wednesday, either.

DEMOCRATS decided on December 10, 2020 that "many Americans are ill-equipped to recognize and sift through false, misleading, or emotionally manipulative posts."

They must have been thinking about their own voters, but they want to decide what everyone is allowed to say, see, hear, or write online.

https://wexton.house.gov/uploadedfiles/12.10.20_house_democrats_disinformation_roadmap_to_president-elect_biden.pdf
 
Funny how we have a thread here seriously suggesting that folks that were simply in the capital at the time that riots happened means that the same folks should be in prison and that the left are the ones suggesting it...

Actually, it isn't funny. Folks who think that political opponents should spend time in jail because of some folks who rioted ignore the fact that both sides have these fringe folks that riot.

Rioters can serve time, after a trial. Folks who were protesting without damage, not so much.

Pretending that this is about social media, "priceless" I guess...

Don't know anything about anyone spending time in jail, and both sides do have dimwits that riot, however, it was the right's dimwits who invaded and vandalized the Capital, first that has happened since 1812, and in the process the prevented the Congress from executing its Constitutional duties, not to mention Trump's role in the whole affair

But the thread was on censorship, and the right's employing it as a deflection
 
This thread isn't about Trump, Anchovies.

It's about JPP's future.

And it's not about last Wednesday, either.

DEMOCRATS decided on December 10, 2020 that "many Americans are ill-equipped to recognize and sift through false, misleading, or emotionally manipulative posts."

They must have been thinking about their own voters, but they want to decide what everyone is allowed to say, see, hear, or write online.

https://wexton.house.gov/uploadedfiles/12.10.20_house_democrats_disinformation_roadmap_to_president-elect_biden.pdf

I don't post about Trump or last Wednesday, rather your, and the right's media's attempt, to deflect off of Trump and last Wednesday by now supposedly being all concerned about censorship

And your post regarding the letter of December 10, 2020 has already been busted, remember, it is where you used one source's interpretation of the letter and then attempted to pass that off as the letter itself
 
I don't post about Trump or last Wednesday, rather your, and the right's media's attempt, to deflect off of Trump and last Wednesday by now supposedly being all concerned about censorship And your post regarding the letter of December 10, 2020 has already been busted, remember, it is where you used one source's interpretation of the letter and then attempted to pass that off as the letter itself

Comical how now the right suddenly has a crusade over supposed censorship cause Trump got thrown off social media, actually a deflection to move attention off of Trump's post election debacle, especially the culminating events of last Wednesday They just love the martyr role, plays well with the demogogues

:thinking:
 
Having difficulties processing, "actually a deflection to move attention off of," couldn't have been any clearer

I don't post about Trump or last Wednesday, rather your, and the right's media's attempt, to deflect off of Trump and last Wednesday by now supposedly being all concerned about censorship And your post regarding the letter of December 10, 2020 has already been busted, remember, it is where you used one source's interpretation of the letter and then attempted to pass that off as the letter itself

Comical how now the right suddenly has a crusade over supposed censorship cause Trump got thrown off social media, actually a deflection to move attention off of Trump's post election debacle, especially the culminating events of last Wednesday They just love the martyr role, plays well with the demogogues

:thinking:
 
Back
Top