Will JPP survive?

christiefan915 said:
They wrote a letter to Biden a month ago. I haven't seen a response but admit this isn't on my list of priorities. My spidey senses tell me this won't be at the top of Biden's list either.
Click to expand...

I suspect a glass of warm milk before bedtime is the usurper's main priority. You seem to think he is the only member of his Administration that works on things.
 
Legion said:
If by "hope" you mean a federally-funded initiative tasked with deciding what constitutes "disinformation" and "dangerous "propaganda" and taking steps to "counter" and "proactively monitor for disinformation" with "collaboration between government and civic organizations" and "programs within the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice that work to deradicalize individuals in online communities"...

https://wexton.house.gov/uploadedfiles/12.10.20_house_democrats_disinformation_roadmap_to_president-elect_biden.pdf
Click to expand...

Honestly, I believe this will get as much traction as Melania's "be best" initiative. :awesome:
 
christiefan915 said:
Honestly, I believe this will get as much traction as Melania's "be best" initiative.
Click to expand...

What you choose to believe is non-binding on the federal government.

You do realize that AI has been used for years in the public and private sector to detect "undesirable" content online, don't you?

These people want to go farther, they want to fund "collaborations" to "counter" what they deem "dangerous" in way that avoids any Constitutional issues.

I'm not comfortable with a Congressional initiative to "proactively monitor" and "counter" LEGAL online speech by US citizens without probable cause (i.e. a warrant).
 
christiefan915 said:
Honestly, I believe this will get as much traction as Melania's "be best" initiative. :awesome:
Click to expand...

LOL. Agreed. The First Amendment still rules even if people can be arrested for threatening to kill politicians, overthrow the government or falsely scream "FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater to start a panic.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
LOL. Agreed. The First Amendment still rules even if people can be arrested for threatening to kill politicians, overthrow the government or falsely scream "FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater to start a panic.
Click to expand...

Yep. Apparently he doesn't understand the concept of First Amendment.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
LOL. Agreed. The First Amendment still rules even if people can be arrested for threatening to kill politicians, overthrow the government or falsely scream "FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater to start a panic.
Click to expand...

What's ironic? Even if JPP disappears, Lesion would probably be to blame. :rofl2:
 
Dutch Uncle said:
LOL. Agreed. The First Amendment still rules even if people can be arrested for threatening to kill politicians, overthrow the government or falsely scream "FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater to start a panic.
Click to expand...

The First Amendment doesn't limit anyone but Congress.
 
anchovies said:
it was the right's dimwits who invaded and vandalized the Capital, first that has happened since 1812, and in the process the prevented the Congress from executing its Constitutional duties
Click to expand...

:thinking:


Thirty-seven people were arrested from the Committee room in the Hart Senate Office Building, and charged with disorderly conduct under the D.C. Code. An additional thirty-one people were arrested from outside the hearing room, and charged with crowding, obstructing, or incommoding. One man, a Code Pink demonstrator, was arrested inside the hearing room and charged with resisting arrest, simple assault, and disruption of congress under the D.C. Code.

https://dcist.com/story/18/09/04/kavanaugh-hearing-arrests/
 
Legion said:
The First Amendment doesn't limit anyone but Congress.
Click to expand...

That's incorrect. It limits the powers of the Federal government which, in turn, limits the powers of the States by mutual agreement.

Where the Liberals veer off the road is when they seek to violate the 10th Amendment and, more recently, the 12th.

Trump has a right to free speech. He doesn't have a right to take your megaphone and abuse it. Neither does anyone else.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
LOL. Agreed. The First Amendment still rules even if people can be arrested for threatening to kill politicians, overthrow the government or falsely scream "FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater to start a panic.
Click to expand...

You don't support the 1st amendment.
You support hate speech laws.
You think teasing women about big hands warrants an FBI investigation.
You're off your rocker gramps.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That's incorrect.
Click to expand...

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
 
Legion said:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Click to expand...
Thanks for quoting the First Amendment. Now explain why you are shitposting about JPP.
 
AProudLefty said:
Quotes, please.
Click to expand...

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...an-from-the-White-House&p=4164707#post4164707

Dutch Uncle said:
...and you keep bragging about your balls, hands and dick. Tell it to the FBI when you see them.

Then quit whining like a dummy.
Click to expand...



https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ng-our-country-together&p=4132066#post4132066

Dutch Uncle said:
Agreed. It's a common problem with ancient texts. IMHO, it's best to look at the concept they are attempting to convey rather than the "power of the written word" being presented. I do not take any ancient texts literally. Some can be verified to a small extent, but the point seems to be conveying a way of thinking, not just saying who did what to whom.

Example. If you wanted to end racism in the civilized world, is it better to stamp it out with laws and, when necessary, force or is it better to try to teach others a way of thinking where racism is unimportant because it doesn't exist?
Click to expand...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I've been warning poor, poor Witold about his association with RW terrorists all day long. I think he's panicking.
Click to expand...

I've ONLY condemned the Capitol attack about 50 times.

You desperate, deluded, delusional, dumb, dipsh!t.

If anybody here is most like a terrorist it's your buddy evince.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top