With Automatic Voter Registration, Say Hello To Permanent Democrat Power

Typical for a Democrats to say that. That is like saying Hunter has broke no laws because he has not been convicted

No, just the truth, the right have never offered proof of one election where rigging or voting fraud changed the outcome of the election, not one, ever, and please, don’t tell us it happens even though no one knows it happened, no one can disprove that which has yet to be proven
 
I would think that even rightys would want the most people to vote as possible. That would likely mean that the politicians in office actually were chosen by the most voters. That would be a good thing. Our politicians would represent the will of the people.
In the 1980s, the Repubs figured out that when more people voted, they did not do as well. So they spent a lot of time and money developing ways to prevent many people from exercising their right to vote. The voter suppression techniques that they developed were aimed directly at potential Dem voters. It has been part of our elections since then.
They also industrialized gerrymandering to keep them in power when they did not have the most voters.
The Reds call that winning.
 
No you didn’t, all you did was offer debunked claims,
You didn't debunk anything.
and it is not stone fallacy,
Yes it is.
Buzzword fallacy.
the right have never offered proof of one election where rigging or voting fraud changed the outcome of the election, not one, ever
You can't make the evidence just disappear, dude. You can't make people's judgement of that evidence just disappear either. You cannot escape your fate.
 
No, just the truth,
Lies are not the truth.
the right have never offered proof of one election where rigging or voting fraud changed the outcome of the election, not one, ever, and please, don’t tell us it happens even though no one knows it happened, no one can disprove that which has yet to be proven
You can't make the evidence just disappear, Anchovies. You can't make people's judgement of that evidence just disappear either.
 
I would think that even rightys would want the most people to vote as possible. That would likely mean that the politicians in office actually were chosen by the most voters. That would be a good thing. Our politicians would represent the will of the people.
In the 1980s, the Repubs figured out that when more people voted, they did not do as well. So they spent a lot of time and money developing ways to prevent many people from exercising their right to vote. The voter suppression techniques that they developed were aimed directly at potential Dem voters. It has been part of our elections since then.
They also industrialized gerrymandering to keep them in power when they did not have the most voters.
The Reds call that winning.

Inversion fallacy, Nordbutt (projection). You are just describing yourself and Democrats again.
 
No, just the truth, the right have never offered proof of one election where rigging or voting fraud changed the outcome of the election, not one, ever, and please, don’t tell us it happens even though no one knows it happened, no one can disprove that which has yet to be proven

So the Democrats are just likr the Russians in 2016
 
So if enough voters wanted to bring back slavery one of the parties should "craft a platform to appeal" to them? Youre deluded dipshit.

What a fucking dipshit. There is this thing called the constitution and even if everyone voted to make it fine to go rob a bank that would not make it legal.

Funny in this thread that all the rightwingers would be dead set against having all eligible Americans voting because they know it would mean the end of them.
 
Look at friggin' map some time!

BJm9jZQOAfNeJ1Ek9RNWWFET8pCMA4VfNrecZtasMpVZvApop0v4pT_R2vGvXhqUntIpBhqbyRJB7b1o7MP0m1247Gk14D9MxEslxoRsPpahUHAjyWNZ3sVUXoho1irRe3q5BFNu_9uIHZeQxwHScCYu_5jJMwPl2tDr5bqnxzlSyyM726Mh5ryPK-6i_Wx4VikK33dkTTm8hQ8ETuGHKEnb_YD5zdtcdf96=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu


What I stated is absolutely accurate. Larger urban areas are almost exclusively Democrat territory while the rest of the country is Republican. The only exceptions are areas with lots of Native Americans or Blacks that vote Democrat.

The blue areas are where everyone lives, the red ones are practically uninhabited, only crickets and they don't vote.
 
I can't tell if the OP is posting horseshit or dogshit. (Or is it plain bullshit?) If you want to talk about rigging elections in the real world, let's start with Republican gerrymandering. Without the ability to redraw maps, the GOP would have gone extinct and the US would be caught up with the rest of the developed world.
 
Look at friggin' map some time!

BJm9jZQOAfNeJ1Ek9RNWWFET8pCMA4VfNrecZtasMpVZvApop0v4pT_R2vGvXhqUntIpBhqbyRJB7b1o7MP0m1247Gk14D9MxEslxoRsPpahUHAjyWNZ3sVUXoho1irRe3q5BFNu_9uIHZeQxwHScCYu_5jJMwPl2tDr5bqnxzlSyyM726Mh5ryPK-6i_Wx4VikK33dkTTm8hQ8ETuGHKEnb_YD5zdtcdf96=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu


What I stated is absolutely accurate. Larger urban areas are almost exclusively Democrat territory while the rest of the country is Republican. The only exceptions are areas with lots of Native Americans or Blacks that vote Democrat.

The problem with this map is that it doesn't prove your argument. If anything, it shows the folly of the US electoral system. The truth is that less than 25% of Americans voters identify as Republican and about 33% identify as Democrat. The remaining US voters identify as "Independent." Also, during the last few presidential elections, half of eligible US voters didn't even vote.

Here's a better map:

5E63CEE6-AA3F-4906-8F6BFC967DCFD579.jpg

The top map shows how the US voted in 2020. The bottom map shows population distribution.
 
Back
Top