With Automatic Voter Registration, Say Hello To Permanent Democrat Power

Let me repeat myself for those having difficulty processing, the right have never offered proof of one election where rigging or voting fraud changed the outcome of the election, not one, ever, so “pidgin” returns with “you can’t make the evidence just appear,” ah, one more time, there is no evidence, none, zippo, zero, etc., even your Messiah’s fixer proclaimed such

RAAA. You cannot just make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats disappear, Anchovies. You can't just make people's judgement of that evidence just disappear either. You cannot escape your fate.
 
RAAA. You cannot just make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats disappear, Anchovies. You can't just make people's judgement of that evidence just disappear either. You cannot escape your fate.

Not worth repeating again, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him ……………

And you can’t make people who believe in Leprechaun change their minds, but that doesn’t mean Leprechauns exist
 
Little guys? They are all gods. Supreme non-corporal beings with incredible powers.
Except they do not exist. Man created them. Time to dispense with them.

That isn't proof they don't exist.

18cfa3fb46924fccaf0334f4d19db5d7.jpg
 
That isn't proof they don't exist.

18cfa3fb46924fccaf0334f4d19db5d7.jpg

You claim god exists, prove it. If you were honest, you would admit those who make a claim that a god exists have the prove it. An invisible creature that runs the whole universe? That makes no sense.,
Who made this god? Who made, whoever made that god. Turtles all the way down. The concept is stupid and indefensible.
 
You claim god exists, prove it. If you were honest, you would admit those who make a claim that a god exists have the prove it. An invisible creature that runs the whole universe? That makes no sense.,
Who made this god? Who made, whoever made that god. Turtles all the way down. The concept is stupid and indefensible.

I don't have to any more than saying aliens exist. Absence of proof isn't proof of absence. What is indefensible is saying that a god or gods cannot possibly exist. We know so little about the universe and such, that there is plenty of room for things like a god or gods to exist, even if we don't have concrete proof of it.

Your argument tries to put specifics on god when we really don't know what those are. Somewhere about 2000 + years ago, Greek and Indian philosophers theorized that something like the atom had to exist. They couldn't prove it, but they made that claim. Today we know atoms exist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism

Same thing with god. We can theorize god exists and maybe one of these days millennia from now we will prove it. In the meantime, one should accept that god is possible far more easily than make a flat out statement that god cannot exist. It would be like saying atoms don't exist because we can't see them 2000 years ago.
 
Back
Top