GOP Platform: Women Not Human

Superfreak said:
Funny how you think you speak for all women. You want them to walk in lockstep with you and if they don't you dehumanize them the same way you do the unborn child. You call them self hating for daring to hold a view that is different from yours. That is how truly pathetic you are.
Click to expand...

You're a man .. do you speak for ANY?

Wait .. you're on the right .. so I guess that gives you authority over women and you get to challenge them on what they think about them.

Kinda' typical and exactly what all the noise is about. Men thinking they can tell women what to do with their bodies ..

.. and the result of that is a 15 point lead for Obama by women voters.

Hey, maybe you don't need them.
 
Superfreak said:
1) If the woman's life is in danger then it is a right to life vs. a right to life. That decision should be made by the woman.

2) In the case of rape, the pregnancy is obviously not a result of the woman's choice as it is in all other pregnancies. I support the right of the child to live, but also cannot support forcing a woman to carry to term a rapists child. It would be her choice.

Darla simply wishes to paint everyone as black or white. If you don't agree with her that women should have the right to kill all unborn children, then you are a woman hater who wishes to dehumanize women. Which is quite ironic given her insistence in dehumanizing the unborn child despite genetics telling us otherwise.
Click to expand...

Darla is so mean! She insists that Republicans are responsible for...their own fucking platform! How can she!

I for one don't give a fuck what your position is. (and it's radical and anti-woman). What matters is that the Republican party adopted the insanely radical Personhood amendment as their platform. And mean ole Darla is going to spread that FACT to as many women as she can.
 
Darla said:
I call them self-hating for supporting Republicans while they have the personhood amendment as their platform.
Click to expand...

Exactly, 'think like I do or you aren't a real woman'. How dare they have a different opinion than you. How dare they support the childs right to life. How dare they not walk in lock step with what you tell them they should think.

That's a no-brainer. Of course they are. That is collaboration in the most monstrous sense of the word. It's real simple if you're not retarded...or a desperate hack.
Click to expand...

LMAO... that is quite ironic, because they view the murder of unborn children as the monstrous act. That is quite simple. They are not science rejecting neanderthals like you.

When you get over your angry outburst, do let us know.
 
blackascoal said:
You're a man .. do you speak for ANY?

Wait .. you're on the right .. so I guess that gives you authority over women and you get to challenge them on what they think about them.

Kinda' typical and exactly what all the noise is about. Men thinking they can tell women what to do with their bodies ..

.. and the result of that is a 15 point lead for Obama by women voters.

Hey, maybe you don't need them.
Click to expand...

We are gonna find out, that's for sure.
 
Bijou said:
And this is where your argument falls apart. It isn't "a woman" making the decision. It is the unborn child's mother. The mother is the only one with the right to make such a decision. And as long as the unborn child resides within the body of the mother, it is a part of the mother and she can kill it if she so chooses. End of story.
Click to expand...

Funny your side doesn't talk like that though. You hide behind euphemisms like "choice" and "women's health".

Here is a thought. Let's for a second leave rape out of the equation. If you women want total control over your bodies, why not keep your legs closed and then you wouldn't get pregnant if you didn't want to be pregnant.

You see I don't want to be a heroin addict, so I don't use heroin. See how that works. Maybe women like you aren't that smart and need your bodies controlled for you since you can't control them yourselves. Oh, I know. This is where you shout out the Daily Kos diatribe about "What about the man?". But, like I said, outside of rape, there ain't no sex happenin unless the woman spreads her legs. So keep em closed and you won't get pregnant.

Of course in your case it is probably a moot point.
 
Superfreak said:
Exactly, 'think like I do or you aren't a real woman'. How dare they have a different opinion than you. How dare they support the childs right to life. How dare they not walk in lock step with what you tell them they should think.



LMAO... that is quite ironic, because they view the murder of unborn children as the monstrous act. That is quite simple. They are not science rejecting neanderthals like you.

When you get over your angry outburst, do let us know.
Click to expand...

Supporting politicians who support the personhood amendment, which turns women into a criminal class, is an act of self-hatred if you are a woman. It's real simple. Though I understand your peabrain is having trouble with it. Could it be the thought of Nancy Pelosi taking the gavel again that is causing you to have trouble?
 
Darla said:
Darla is so mean! She insists that Republicans are responsible for...their own fucking platform! How can she!

I for one don't give a fuck what your position is. (and it's radical and anti-woman). What matters is that the Republican party adopted the insanely radical Personhood amendment as their platform. And mean ole Darla is going to spread that FACT to as many women as she can.
Click to expand...

Oh Darla, you dear care what I think or you would not be responding with such anger and hatred. You are mad that I won't accept your claim that you have the right to kill the unborn children. I know you WANT to dehumanize them, but I simply don't agree with your 'choice' to commit murder.

The only FACT dearest Darla is that not all women agree that unborn children are pieces of meat for you to butcher. You wish to dehumanize women who disagree with you. Tell them that their opinion doesn't count because it is not in lock step with yours. The very fact that you do the same thing the GOP platform is doing continues to escape you.
 
Darla said:
Supporting politicians who support the personhood amendment, which turns women into a criminal class, is an act of self-hatred if you are a woman. It's real simple. Though I understand your peabrain is having trouble with it. Could it be the thought of Nancy Pelosi taking the gavel again that is causing you to have trouble?
Click to expand...

Supporting politicians who think murdering children is a choice in an act of insanity. It is real simple. Which means it is well beyond your capability to respond. Especially in your current state of rage.
 
Superfreak said:
Dem platform: children aren't human, women should be able to kill them if they want. They are not entitled to human rights protections, because, like, we are liberals and we get to decide who is human based on a whim, rather than science.
Click to expand...


"women should be able to kill children if they want..."

Oh the hyperbole!!

Decided that honest debate just isn't your thing any more?

What the hell happened to you?
 
Superfreak said:
Oh Darla, you dear care what I think or you would not be responding with such anger and hatred. You are mad that I won't accept your claim that you have the right to kill the unborn children. I know you WANT to dehumanize them, but I simply don't agree with your 'choice' to commit murder.
Click to expand...

That's the argument you want to have, because that's the argument that you mistakenly believe makes you sound sane.

It isn't about killing unborn children. It's about mothers having the right to choose whether or not to keep or kill their own unborn children. Not anyone else's. Your word-twisting hysteria comes straight from the Christian Righty Zealot playbook. Be proud; you're now associated with the nutball wing of the GOP.

The only FACT dearest Darla is that not all women agree that unborn children are pieces of meat for you to butcher. You wish to dehumanize women who disagree with you. Tell them that their opinion doesn't count because it is not in lock step with yours. The very fact that you do the same thing the GOP platform is doing continues to escape you.
Click to expand...

Darla's (and my) stance has nothing to do with dictating to others. I maintain that CHOICE to keep or kill one's own unborn child is the issue. It is you and your ilk that wants to make that decision for all women.
 
blackascoal said:
You're a man .. do you speak for ANY?

Wait .. you're on the right .. so I guess that gives you authority over women and you get to challenge them on what they think about them.

Kinda' typical and exactly what all the noise is about. Men thinking they can tell women what to do with their bodies ..

.. and the result of that is a 15 point lead for Obama by women voters.

Hey, maybe you don't need them.
Click to expand...

Funny BAC, because before the war on the unborn, it was the African Americans that were deemed sub human. That they did not deserve basic human rights.

You are damned straight I will speak up for any human being that is being denied the right to life. You can deny science all you wish. You can pretend all you want. But it will not change the basic genetic fact that the unborn child is a unique human life. A life that women like Darla want to be able to kill out of convenience and want to kill to avoid responsibility for their choices.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
"women should be able to kill children if they want..."

Oh the hyperbole!!

Decided that honest debate just isn't your thing any more?

What the hell happened to you?
Click to expand...

Well, let's be clear and honest. There's a difference between women having the right to 'kill children' and women having the right to kill their own unborn child. The latter is already legal. That's why the nutjobs here won't argue the latter and keep screaming that it's the former.
 
Superfreak said:
1) If the woman's life is in danger then it is a right to life vs. a right to life. That decision should be made by the woman.

2) In the case of rape, the pregnancy is obviously not a result of the woman's choice as it is in all other pregnancies. I support the right of the child to live, but also cannot support forcing a woman to carry to term a rapists child. It would be her choice.

Darla simply wishes to paint everyone as black or white. If you don't agree with her that women should have the right to kill all unborn children, then you are a woman hater who wishes to dehumanize women. Which is quite ironic given her insistence in dehumanizing the unborn child despite genetics telling us otherwise.
Click to expand...


Well, let's get real here. I mean, your hedging on #2 makes it really just a matter of line-drawing, doesn't it? You and Darla both support a woman's right to have an abortion under certain circumstances. So, like, aren't you a supporter of "baby"-murder, too, albeit under narrow circumstances?

At least the GOP platform, batshit-fucking crazy as it is, has a guiding principle. You're just hedging because you don't want to appear to be a complete fucking monster, but in so doing you lose whatever principle you claim to be supporting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top