Cancel 2016.11
Darla
That's very oddly worded, I see nothing that disputes a supermajority wanting background checks.
again, rights of the minority MUST BE PROTECTED. what part of that do you not understand?Well there you have it.
again, fuck the NRA and fuck the 90% of people who believe it's ok to negate the rights of the 10%.
because we'd go to war to defend YOUR rights if they were ever under attack from the majority.
again, rights of the minority MUST BE PROTECTED. what part of that do you not understand?
the background check is USELESS when those that ignore it will get a gun anyway, so it IS an infringement on the rights of others.Passing a background check so that criminals, those who have been charged with beating up their wives, girlfriends, stalkers, violent felons, etc, don't get guns is not a restriction of anyone's rights.
yes they most assuredly are.Your rights are not absolute.
there is nothing sensical about enforcing a law that criminals will ignore and will only make things more difficult for peaceful people.Conflating the very nebulous term "gun control" with common sense procedures like background checks is one way you guys confuse the issue. But it doesn't work with everyone.
false equivalency and a HUGE strawman. try again.No that's not absolute. I could say that since 10% of the country are pedophiles their "rights" must be protected. Only certain rights. They have no right to have sex with children, and criminals have no right to be armed. It's simple. Kinda like Dick and Jane stuff.
false equivalency and a HUGE strawman. try again.
the background check is USELESS when those that ignore it will get a gun anyway, so it IS an infringement on the rights of others.
yes they most assuredly are.
there is nothing sensical about enforcing a law that criminals will ignore and will only make things more difficult for peaceful people.
the background check is USELESS when those that ignore it will get a gun anyway, so it IS an infringement on the rights of others.
yes they most assuredly are.
there is nothing sensical about enforcing a law that criminals will ignore and will only make things more difficult for peaceful people.
you have to show me anywhere in US case law history, US constitution, or any state constitution that even gives a HINT of a right to have sex with children.....or are you saying you want the right to have sex with children??Nothing false about it, it burned your ass because it's right on.
another false equivalency. you're losing it big time darlaHorseshit. Like any law, it won't stop all criminals, but it will stop some, and help catch others. I could as easily say, hey only criminals murder so why have laws against it?!
DOH
more false equivalency and more failureThis is poor logic.
Ignoring laws is what criminals do. It's what makes what they do crimes, and what makes them criminals.
Using your logic, there really shouldn't be any laws - because criminals ignore them anyway.
more false equivalency and more failure
you have to show me anywhere in US case law history, US constitution, or any state constitution that even gives a HINT of a right to have sex with children.....or are you saying you want the right to have sex with children??
another false equivalency. you're losing it big time darla
so you trust the polls you like but not the ones you dont like.
how did that work out for you in the last election?
yes, it is your failure. it's all in your viewpoint. your mental mindset NEEDS to believe that laws against murder will prevent murder when, in fact, reality is much different. The law doesn't prevent murders, it provides a punishment for those that commit murder.Unfortunately, what I wrote is the exact logic you were using.
So, if there is a failure, it ain't mine.
I didn't accuse you of being a pedophile, I asked you if that's what you wanted or were defending. HUGE HUGE difference.Wow, talk about losing it. I could report you for this and probably get a ban, but I won't. I suggest you don't imply that I am pedophile again though. Just because you lost an argument there is no need to get so low...and further, you just committed one of the only two bannable offenses here.