Republicans Aren’t Christians

DamnYankee said:
It depends upon what the background check encompasses, and the criteria for denial. Slippery slope...
Click to expand...

Pretty well stated in Toomey/Manchin....did you read the bill.or just go with what the NRAZI handbook told you?

EDIT: but guns have nothing to do with this thread. Unless Jesus told you in scripture that you have a right to a gun
 
Steelplate said:
Pretty well stated in Toomey/Manchin....did you read the bill.or just go with what the NRAZI handbook told you?

EDIT: but guns have nothing to do with this thread. Unless Jesus told you in scripture that you have a right to a gun
Click to expand...

I don't support any new laws restricting guns, We have enough now that aren't being enforced.

With regards to personal defense, I'm more of an Old Testament guy.
 
DamnYankee said:
From your link, headline:

How do you get from that, to 'Catholics same thing as atheists'?
Click to expand...

I did not say they were. Of course, they are not the same. It was clearly a joke as I assumed your comments were.

It's funny how you become an overly literal douchebag when it suits you and then claim looser definitions if it helps you slink away.
 
Threedee said:
It's also multiple generations of Democrats lost to eternity, but I guess they deserve it. Was the Holocaust our business? Slavery? When does moral relativism yield to mass murder?
Click to expand...
Probably when the Pope OK'd the slaughter of nearly 100 million native Americans in the 15th/16th century.
 
Professor Baxter said:
I did not say they were. Of course, they are not the same. It was clearly a joke as I assumed your comments were.

It's funny how you become an overly literal douchebag when it suits you and then claim looser definitions if it helps you slink away.
Click to expand...

LOL, the tried and true "I was kidding" defense. Followed with name-calling and insults.

Just admit that you fucked up.
 
DamnYankee said:
I don't support any new laws restricting guns, We have enough now that aren't being enforced.

With regards to personal defense, I'm more of an Old Testament guy.
Click to expand...

Toomey/Manchin would have better enforced current laws. BTW, eye for an eye went away when Christ came...now it's turn the other cheek. You don't get to pick and choose which of God's laws you are going to abide by.
 
Professor Baxter said:
You are an idiot. But I wont ask if you swallow or any of the other revolting comments we hear regularly from the so called Christians. My insults against the mental capacity of others are not equivalent.

I don't claim to be a Christian. Why would I hold myself to the beam in your eye stuff? If you criticize others based on their failure to adhere to a moral code you don't follow, then you've got an error in your logic. I don't follow that book of immorality because it is impactical. I am not in that straitjacket. You are and probably for good reason.
Click to expand...

And yet; here you are judging others on your perception and assumption of what they are or aren't doing.

hmmmm!!
 
Steelplate said:
Toomey/Manchin would have better enforced current laws. BTW, eye for an eye went away when Christ came...now it's turn the other cheek. You don't get to pick and choose which of God's laws you are going to abide by.
Click to expand...

ll we need to do to enforce current laws is to, well, enforce them. We don't need an act of congress to do that.

Sorry, but if a guy comes at me with a knife I'm not turning the cheek. Being Christian is not a suicide pact...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top